After Monday’s vigorous defense of the domestic spying program by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, it came as a surprise when the White House decided to brief the full House and Senate intelligence committees in closed-door sessions Wednesday and Thursday. That welcome show of outreach to Capitol Hill on the Bush administration’s part should lead to more efforts to ensure that any wiretapping is done legally, preferably with judicial approval — the way the president assured Americans two years ago that it was happening.
Posted by Rhonda Holman
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- Regular on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Chas on Open thread 11/22
- BlueJay on Open thread 11/22
- Boxlock20 on Open thread 11/22
- satatom on Open thread 11/22
- JimJohnson on Open thread 11/22
14 Comments
This is typical of Bush’s “leadership.”
He does whatever he wants until it causes huge problems, and then under duress he belatedly and grudgingly makes a show of doing what he should have been doing all along.
Worst. President. Ever.
This guy out-machivels Machivelli.
Our great president has become a dangerous little twerp with a Napoleon complex, and he’s surrounded himself with a cabal that has it’s own fascist agenda. The sooner he’s exiled, the safer and freer we’ll be!
Rhonda,
You only assume they were being done illegally.
This is the typical liberal gotcha politics.
Accuse and attack Bush, then when Bush does the slightest thing to show cooperation accuse and attack him more…
You only assume things were done legally. It is a balance. I think her post does say that she thinks this is a step in the right direction. However, liberals are right to keep on the case and question whether all we are getting is more lip service. And coming clean doesn’t excuse previous actions.
Sadly for Nathan, in the present case, it’s the facts that count as a ‘gotcha!’
What facts?
That every President since FISA’s inception have violated it?
That the President has the Constitutional authority to intercept enemy communications during a time of war?
Those facts?
Answer me this:
Do you think that enemy communications should be intercepted during a time of war? YES or NO
NathanYour remark”That every President since FISA’s inception have violated it?”Does that make it right???
Amazing, the most powerful man in the world has no common sense. If he’d gone the House & Senate Intelligence committee, this whole mess would not be as bad. It’s because he knew that this program has “violating our right” label written all over it. A person with a common sense would first ask for approval, before taking on this dangerous idea in the first place. Maybe he did have common sense but just chose to be…..STUPID.
As Soon as the Republicans Voted to Prohibit Gonzales from Testifying Under Oath About Illegal Wiretapping, The Democrats on the Judiciary Committee Should Have Walked Out. Period.
Permanent url: http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/06/02/edi06015.html
February 7, 2006
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
The grand showdown between the Dems upset at Bush’s illegal wiretapping fizzled out as soon as Arlen Specter — the two-faced Bush go-fer of the GOP — not only ruled that Gonzales didn’t have to testify under oath, he pretended — as scripted — to prohibit the Attorney General of the United States from doing what most Americans are required to do in a Court of Law or before Congress (unless they are from the White House or CEOs of big oil companies).
It was at that point, once again, that the Democrats became merely bit players in a script once again written by the White House. For many years, and most recently in several editorials, BuzzFlash has lamented that the Dems don’t understand that these hearings are soap operas — and that the Bush/Rovian propaganda staff writes very effective soap opera scripts.
In this case, the goal of the soap opera was to allow Gonzales not to testify under oath, so that he wouldn’t be likely to be charged with perjury. After that point, everything else just became a big muddle. And, the White House knows, in a situation like this, they win if the hearing turns out to be inconclusive and stalemated.
We had to laugh through our tears for democracy when Arlen Specter boasted that he was the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee and no Attorney General was going to decide for himself to testify under oath, as Gonzales pretended that he wanted to be sworn in (but, of course, knew in advance that it would never happen, so he could lie with impunity). Oh, my Lord, you couldn’t get hack Hollywood scriptwriters to do a better job!
But, as we’ve always said, between the Coasts, Americans believe what they see. And, once again, you had the appearance of an earnest man claiming he wanted to testify under oath because it wouldn’t change what he would say.
Oh yeah, right. You bet it would change what Alberto “Bush Consigliere” Gonzales would have said. He might not have been so eager to lie again.
We can sneer at the cynicism, but most Americans don’t look at the television image or newspaper reporting with a sense of skepticism and irony. That’s largely a trait known primarily to those who are in the thick of the political fray.
The Democrats lost control of the hearing when Specter forced a party line vote of 10-8 that Gonzales wouldn’t be sworn in. Period.
At that moment, the Democratic senators on the Judiciary Committee should have taken charge of the scriptwriting and left the room in protest after ranking member Senator Patrick Leahy made the following statement:
“Mr. Chairman, if we ask athletes who testify about steroid use to be sworn in, if we ask citizens in courtrooms around this land to be sworn in, if we ask civil servants who testify before Congress to be sworn in, we surely think that it is unacceptable that the Attorney General of the United States cannot provide testimony under oath.
“I was a prosecutor and I would ask no less of the highest law enforcement official in the land than I would of someone who enters an American courtroom.
“There is no reason to hold a hearing if the Attorney General of the United States won’t do what we ask of our citizens, which is to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth — and be subject to legal jeopardy if he does not.
“Mr. Chairman, we stand by our Constitution and the rule of law. At this time, we are leaving this hearing until such time as the Attorney General of the United States will be required to testify in the same manner we would require of any citizen in such circumstances.
“There cannot be one rule of law for the average American and another for the Attorney General of the United States.
“Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and now, if you will excuse us, we will no longer be party to this injustice and slight to Americans who dutifully are sworn in throughout the land, day in and day out. They have nothing to fear, why should the Attorney General of the United States of America?
“Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and good day.”
Oh, but those words were never spoken, and we never heard the shuffling of chairs as the Democrats walked out of the hearing in one united defiant stand to uphold the rule of law. That would have gotten the attention of the American public.
And even in Kansas, they would have begun asking why is the Attorney General of the United States above the rule of law. Why do I have to be sworn in and he doesn’t?
It’s a matter of common sense.
The Dems have to stop thinking that they are going to win a chess game based on logic. They have to start seizing the script and the dramatic moment.
They failed again, and the Bush illegal wiretapping continues. And the Attorney General of the United States, Mr. Gonzales — the Consigliere for George W. Bush — once again got away with breaking the law and not being held accountable.
A BUZZFLASH EDITORIAL
Buzzflash Afternote: Why should anyone have to testify under oath in a United States court room when the Attorney General of the United States won’t? And the President and Vice-President wouldn’t before the 9/11 Commission (when Bush wouldn’t even talk with them without Dick Cheney by his side)? And Condoleezza Rice wouldn’t be sworn in before the 9/11 Commission?
Oh, we could go on, but we won’t. The Bush Administration knows that once they have to tell the truth, their goose is cooked.
As long as all presidents continue to go against the FISA restrictions and as long as no one has ther nerve to take it to the Supreme Court, then the presidents may proceed with what they consider to be necessary, Constitutional wiretaps.
All the rest of this crap here is irrelevant.
As long as republicans are in power, there’s going to be a lot of dirt swept under the rug. It’s what they do.
XXX,Yeah, I’ve noticed the carpet’s gotten awful lumpy these last few years.
HEY EVERYBODY! I FOUND OUT JOHN MALKOVICH AND TRUTHREGARDLESS IS REALLY IAN HIMSELF! HAHAHAHA!!