Teens: Don’t ask Dr. Phill

After hearing Phill Kline’s mystifying explanations in court last week about what constitutes injurious underage sex, we’re guessing most teens will adopt a "Don’t ask, don’t tell" policy.
Among the legal sex advice from our attorney general: Kissing and petting is OK, but he’s not sure about fondling genitalia. As long as it "doesn’t shock the moral conscience."
French kissing is probably OK, maybe even if one partner is lying on top of the other. Ooo-la-la. Are you taking notes, kids?
But Kline waxed almost Clintonian in opining that girl-on-boy oral sex might not need to be reported as a crime, but boy-on-girl oral sex should be. The difference? Don’t ask. Kline went on to say that "penetration" was a key issue. But asked how to define it, he said, "I’m not certain."
Any other questions? Keep them to yourself. And tune in tomorrow for another installment of "Ask Dr. Phill."
P.S.: The trial has attracted national attention, including this online Slate column titled, "Smells Like Teen Snogging."
Posted by Randy Scholfield

30 Comments

  1. writerdog
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 2:38 am | Permalink

    Ok? May I suggest that Mrs. Kline is quite disappointed by his opinion!Typical male view of foreplay, gee at least he did not say anything about they could not be in the same room!

  2. Gadsden Purchase
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 5:07 am | Permalink

    Yaaaaaawwwwnnnnnnn

  3. Todd
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 8:55 am | Permalink

    Good God, what a moron.

  4. Gittin' madder by the minute
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    Even the dumb*** right wing must be embarassed at Kline by now. But then, maybe not. They also like to control every aspect of everybody else’s lives. Especially (nervous giggle, tee hee) people’s (whisper now) sex lives.

  5. Jed
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 10:54 am | Permalink

    Kline is rapidly approaching too stupid for words! Will his morality police be peeking in bedroom windows to check that we’re using only the biblically prescribed positions? God forbid sex should be pleasurable!

  6. CrusaderX
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:19 am | Permalink

    Kansans never cease to amaze me.

  7. Allie
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:27 am | Permalink

    Who knows if this will pass the decency standards, but I have to say I doubt a lot of teenage oral sex is boy on girl. Usually it is girls pleasuring boys to keep their boyfriends or their status as technical virgins. Plus, girl on boy is definately penetrative and disease causing. And anyway, isn’t an older girl with a younger boy abuse too? Gee, I am so glad Phill is around so we can all clarify it.

  8. Jed
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:29 am | Permalink

    CruX,Embarrass would be a better word. From here on out, I’m getting a PO Box in New Jersey, so my mail won’t have a Kansas return address!

  9. Jed
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:35 am | Permalink

    Allie,Well, underage girl on boy, or even better, on legislator or attorney, is the ideal being promoted here, and we don’t want those teenage nymphs getting any expectations of reciprocity!

  10. Posted February 7, 2006 at 12:02 pm | Permalink

    Yes, teach them early that sex should only be pleasurable for the man. Any expectations otherwise is simply providing aid and comfort to the terrorists.

  11. TRACY
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 12:43 pm | Permalink

    What’s wrong with you people?Haven’t you ever heard of doing ‘68′?

    That’s where the female performs fellatio, and the man….well, he owes her one!!

    Besides, I’m dissapointed that Phill’s trained beauticians haven’t also been turning in promiscous teens.

  12. Posted February 7, 2006 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Why selfish men ever get laid is a mystery to me.

  13. Damoon
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 5:07 pm | Permalink

    Phil is just too weird for words. Why do we have all these nut cases in Kansas? Is there something in our water or what?

  14. J M Walker
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 5:18 pm | Permalink

    cookie,Selfish men get laid because there will always be stupid women out there who think they can change them.

    Who in their right mind listens to Dr Phil anyway? Talk about a boring life. Oh . . . THAT Phil. See previous sentence.

  15. neophyte
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 6:49 pm | Permalink

    Kansans never cease to amaze me.

    Posted by: CrusaderX | February 07, 2006 at 11:19 AM

    Why, thank you, Crusader!

    Oh, you didn’t mean in a good way??

    Well, not all Kansans are like Phill Kline.

  16. neophyte
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 7:14 pm | Permalink

    *sigh* Now some of my friends think all Kansans are nuts. *feels bad*Darn it.

  17. grayfox
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 7:57 pm | Permalink

    Only in Kansas will you have a so-called conservative politician telling everybody else how to conduct their private lives. I thought conservatives wanted less government not more. Does any know if Kline has his own phone sex line or WEB site? That might be a good WEB (Attorney Generals in Pink) site for all RIGHT WING CONSERVATIVES to visit.

  18. k
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 8:41 pm | Permalink

    Phill’s book “Repbulikan Approved Premarriatal Sex” is due out in paperback this summer.

  19. Damoon
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:13 pm | Permalink

    Are the pages all blank?

  20. CrusaderX
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:22 pm | Permalink

    neophyte,

    I am not a native to your great state. I’m a New Yorker, born and raised. I apologize for my rude,uncouth generalization. Us city folk ain’t always polite. Kansans really are the nicest people. no pun intended.

  21. Damoon
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:29 pm | Permalink

    Crus X, Why are New Yorkers (and many who live in the East)so rude? Everytime I visit that part of the country, I can’t wait to get home again. Thought maybe you might have the inside scoop.

  22. brown
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:32 pm | Permalink

    Is Philllllll pre-occupied with teenage sex? Did he spend too much time abusing himSELF when he was a teenage boy? This seems to be his lifes work now. I’m sure glad we don’t have any real crime in Kansas to distract him from his “mission from God.”

  23. CrusaderX
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:45 pm | Permalink

    Damoon,Because we HATE tourists. They cause traffic. They take pictures of EVERYTHING! Every freakin building they gotta take a damn picture! You know I love NY slogan? well we’re workin on a NY doesnt love you slogan. Well maybe thats exaggerated a bit. We are fast-paced, we get impatient if it takes a half-minute more to get a cup of coffee than usual. I don’t know if this is a NY thing, but I hate tardiness. I hate it in others, as well as myself. I have to be everywhere on time or I get mad at myself. But I’m loving this country life! I’m surprised you call Topeka a city, to me it’s just a big town. I had to readjust a bit over here, but man oh man, I’ve never felt more relaxed in my life when I’m here in KS.

  24. CrusaderX
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 9:55 pm | Permalink

    I cant speak for the Bostonians, we’ve been their rivals ever since we dug the canal to the midwest. I forgot the name of it, but it runs along the U.S. Canada border. Ya see, Boston and NYC were competing for top dog in the trade with Europe since both are port cities. We found a way to transport goods from the Midwest to NYC by the canal we dug. (I still forget the name.) The cost of transporting goods from the Midwest to the East and to the European market was much cheaper on river than by land, especially with that pesky Appalachian mountain range in the way. Boston however was not so fortunate, since their state has no water access to the Midwest, we New Yorkers BUILT one! And with our own damn money too! We didnt take one red cent from federal taxes either. So it cost the rest of Americans nothing. Thomas Jefferson said the idea could never be done! and that New Yorkers were insane to believe they could do it! Well we did! take that Boston! hahahahaha!!!Damoon, they think we’re stuck up arrogant bastards, while we think they’re just jealous. :)

  25. Ian Santiago
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 10:06 pm | Permalink

    I was born and raised and I despise jew yorkers! Of course CruX is a PR and a jew yorker so rudeness should be expected.

    Viva La Raza Blanco!!

  26. Ian Santiago
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 10:08 pm | Permalink

    Yikes, that should read I was born and raised in Boston and I despise jew yorkers!

    V.L.R.B!!

  27. CrusaderX
    Posted February 7, 2006 at 11:24 pm | Permalink

    Yes Ian, everyone in New York is jewish. and we’re out to take over America!! ooohh, here come the big bad jews comin to git ya! We may be mean, but we have a special place in our hearts for closet-self-hating-Hispanics like you Ian. Really, what’s up with the I hate everybody attitude Ian? Sounds like you need therapy. Oh, and Ian you discovered our RomanCatholic-Jewish plot to steal America from the Protestants! How dare you! Don’t forget that we control the media too Ian. You aren’t safe from us! Beware!!! :)

  28. writerdog
    Posted February 8, 2006 at 2:45 am | Permalink

    Cookie, I am not selfish…read into it what you will. Just do not let Phil hear about it. Last I knew Kansas still has a sodomy law that make it illegal even between two hetro-sexual adults.

  29. Rage
    Posted February 8, 2006 at 4:41 am | Permalink

    Quite the amusing article from Lithwick, though what Kline’s doing isn’t very funny.

  30. Jed
    Posted February 9, 2006 at 2:14 am | Permalink

    Ian,You weren’t born and raised, you were hatched and abandoned!