<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Budget based on unrealistic assumptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 20:31:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: PoorPerson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26833</link>
		<dc:creator>PoorPerson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 18:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26833</guid>
		<description>From the link provided by Sum1:

&quot;Nevertheless, it&#039;s here. Unlike Bush&#039;s generalized privatization talk of last year, we&#039;re now talking detailed numbers. On page 321 of the budget proposal, you see the privatization costs: $24.182 billion in fiscal 2010, $57.429 billion in fiscal 2011 and another $630.533 billion for the five years after that, for a seven-year total of $712.144 billion.&quot;

My question is this nearly three quarters of a trillion dollars all money that people could invest, or are there other costs being covered by these figures, or do we even have any idea?

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the link provided by Sum1:</p>
<p>&#8220;Nevertheless, it&#8217;s here. Unlike Bush&#8217;s generalized privatization talk of last year, we&#8217;re now talking detailed numbers. On page 321 of the budget proposal, you see the privatization costs: $24.182 billion in fiscal 2010, $57.429 billion in fiscal 2011 and another $630.533 billion for the five years after that, for a seven-year total of $712.144 billion.&#8221;</p>
<p>My question is this nearly three quarters of a trillion dollars all money that people could invest, or are there other costs being covered by these figures, or do we even have any idea?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sum1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26832</link>
		<dc:creator>Sum1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26832</guid>
		<description>Okay, here&#039;s the link from NBC.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11235990/site/newsweek/from/RSS&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11235990/site/newsweek/from/RSS&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, here&#8217;s the link from NBC.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11235990/site/newsweek/from/RSS" rel="nofollow">http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11235990/site/newsweek/from/RSS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sum1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26831</link>
		<dc:creator>Sum1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26831</guid>
		<description>I only heard a blurb and haven&#039;t had a chance to look into this yet.

Did Bush actually push in something about privitization of social security into the budget?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I only heard a blurb and haven&#8217;t had a chance to look into this yet.</p>
<p>Did Bush actually push in something about privitization of social security into the budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26830</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 05:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26830</guid>
		<description>Outlander,

Indeed, though I beat you to the self-correction (see the post above).

Still, since you&#039;re a fan of Slim Pickens, here&#039;s a line for you:

&quot;What in the Wide, Wide, World of Sports is a goin&#039; on here?!?&quot;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Outlander,</p>
<p>Indeed, though I beat you to the self-correction (see the post above).</p>
<p>Still, since you&#8217;re a fan of Slim Pickens, here&#8217;s a line for you:</p>
<p>&#8220;What in the Wide, Wide, World of Sports is a goin&#8217; on here?!?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outlander</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26829</link>
		<dc:creator>Outlander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:09:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26829</guid>
		<description>&quot;I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.&quot;

CF: Ya got the wrong Slim. Slim Pickens was the missile rider in Dr. Strangelove.  Slim Whitman provides the peace update theme song (Uno Paloma Blanca)on the Rush Limbaugh show.

Say, you haven&#039;t been listening to Rush... nah. Me neither.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.&#8221;</p>
<p>CF: Ya got the wrong Slim. Slim Pickens was the missile rider in Dr. Strangelove.  Slim Whitman provides the peace update theme song (Uno Paloma Blanca)on the Rush Limbaugh show.</p>
<p>Say, you haven&#8217;t been listening to Rush&#8230; nah. Me neither.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26828</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 02:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26828</guid>
		<description>Rage, XXX,

Having seen John Malkovich (who seems to be trying out his own version of &quot;Being CF&quot;) in action, I seem to have created a monster, what with the potty mouth and all.

Still, I have to say it was worth it.  No grudges against the Eagle folks; it&#039;s their party, and they&#039;ll cry if they want to.  I&#039;m just amazed they left it up as long as they did.

Anyway, got to spend time with the fam.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rage, XXX,</p>
<p>Having seen John Malkovich (who seems to be trying out his own version of &#8220;Being CF&#8221;) in action, I seem to have created a monster, what with the potty mouth and all.</p>
<p>Still, I have to say it was worth it.  No grudges against the Eagle folks; it&#8217;s their party, and they&#8217;ll cry if they want to.  I&#8217;m just amazed they left it up as long as they did.</p>
<p>Anyway, got to spend time with the fam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26827</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 01:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26827</guid>
		<description>X., to the extent I believe what I&#039;ve been told, I admire the carpenter&#039;s son. Unfortunately, his views aren&#039;t particularly influentual these days!

You notice they took down Brian&#039;s post, too?

Ah, yes, even an implication to a word any 8-year-old knows is verboten!

What a mature media culture! But I can say &quot;shit,&quot; can&#039;t I? Hell, yeah, this fits within the friggin&#039; blog rules!

It&#039;s their blog. . .and their server... and their press. And their income (the most important thing). I congratuate them for allowing some dissent on their servers. They&#039;re basically, ya know, human beings.  I AM NOT BEING SARCASTIC.

They&#039;re just remaining within their perceived economic norm. Which will inevitably change. . . Sigh. . the whole language thing is so incredibly silly. . .but taboo words exist in every language. . . for a reason. The game continues.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>X., to the extent I believe what I&#8217;ve been told, I admire the carpenter&#8217;s son. Unfortunately, his views aren&#8217;t particularly influentual these days!</p>
<p>You notice they took down Brian&#8217;s post, too?</p>
<p>Ah, yes, even an implication to a word any 8-year-old knows is verboten!</p>
<p>What a mature media culture! But I can say &#8220;shit,&#8221; can&#8217;t I? Hell, yeah, this fits within the friggin&#8217; blog rules!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s their blog. . .and their server&#8230; and their press. And their income (the most important thing). I congratuate them for allowing some dissent on their servers. They&#8217;re basically, ya know, human beings.  I AM NOT BEING SARCASTIC.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re just remaining within their perceived economic norm. Which will inevitably change. . . Sigh. . the whole language thing is so incredibly silly. . .but taboo words exist in every language. . . for a reason. The game continues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26826</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26826</guid>
		<description>Rage, it&#039;s Hog Rider. Nah, I&#039;m not going to flame you. I&#039;m in a good mood. I&#039;ll just remind you about the &quot;blessed are the peacemakers&quot; thing.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rage, it&#8217;s Hog Rider. Nah, I&#8217;m not going to flame you. I&#8217;m in a good mood. I&#8217;ll just remind you about the &#8220;blessed are the peacemakers&#8221; thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26825</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 23:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26825</guid>
		<description>CF, I see they took down your post...took a while tho. I think you may have set some kind of record. Chalk one up for the blog Nazis. So much for free speech and the first amendment.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF, I see they took down your post&#8230;took a while tho. I think you may have set some kind of record. Chalk one up for the blog Nazis. So much for free speech and the first amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26824</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26824</guid>
		<description>The Bush Budget is no more bogus than the Bush WMDs.

OOPS!  Those were bogus too!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Bush Budget is no more bogus than the Bush WMDs.</p>
<p>OOPS!  Those were bogus too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: XXX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26823</link>
		<dc:creator>XXX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26823</guid>
		<description>Rage, I hate to be confusing, but I&#039;m in agreement with CF.

CF,Way to flame, man! You Rock!

I nominate Malkovich as the blog moron.Any seconds?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rage, I hate to be confusing, but I&#8217;m in agreement with CF.</p>
<p>CF,Way to flame, man! You Rock!</p>
<p>I nominate Malkovich as the blog moron.Any seconds?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26822</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26822</guid>
		<description>Cookie has a point. These threads are too often hijacked by private disputes.

I know very well that CF, Brian, etc. know and care about Bush&#039;s non-budget. My humble advice (certainly not from any presumed superior pedestal): Don&#039;t let the rhetoric get to you. Stay on subject.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cookie has a point. These threads are too often hijacked by private disputes.</p>
<p>I know very well that CF, Brian, etc. know and care about Bush&#8217;s non-budget. My humble advice (certainly not from any presumed superior pedestal): Don&#8217;t let the rhetoric get to you. Stay on subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26821</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26821</guid>
		<description>EE,

You are SOOOOOO right! I realized this while I was on my way to an appointment, and couldn&#039;t get back to repost.  Oh, the shame!  Not that there&#039;s anything wrong with Slim Whitman, you understand.  But Slim Pickens--WHAT an actor!  &quot;Why Mr. Taggert, you use your mouth purtier than a two-dollar whore!&quot; Genius!

John Malkovich,

And your point was...?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EE,</p>
<p>You are SOOOOOO right! I realized this while I was on my way to an appointment, and couldn&#8217;t get back to repost.  Oh, the shame!  Not that there&#8217;s anything wrong with Slim Whitman, you understand.  But Slim Pickens&#8211;WHAT an actor!  &#8220;Why Mr. Taggert, you use your mouth purtier than a two-dollar whore!&#8221; Genius!</p>
<p>John Malkovich,</p>
<p>And your point was&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etiquette-espouser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26820</link>
		<dc:creator>etiquette-espouser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26820</guid>
		<description>&quot;I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.&quot;

Actually, that great character actor went by the name of Slim Pickens, I believe.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, that great character actor went by the name of Slim Pickens, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cookie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26819</link>
		<dc:creator>cookie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 20:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26819</guid>
		<description>You guys are truly amazing.

Wasn&#039;t this a post on Bush&#039;s budget?

Did anyone read the article in the Washington Post about how Bush wrote in Social Security privitization into his budget proposal?

If that gets approved, people that depend on Social Security for their incomes are really gonna be screwed.

Good thing Coretta isn&#039;t around any more to see that.  If the cancer didn&#039;t kill her, this would.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys are truly amazing.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t this a post on Bush&#8217;s budget?</p>
<p>Did anyone read the article in the Washington Post about how Bush wrote in Social Security privitization into his budget proposal?</p>
<p>If that gets approved, people that depend on Social Security for their incomes are really gonna be screwed.</p>
<p>Good thing Coretta isn&#8217;t around any more to see that.  If the cancer didn&#8217;t kill her, this would.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26818</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26818</guid>
		<description>Pardon??
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pardon??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26817</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26817</guid>
		<description>:))Glad you enjoyed it...won&#039;t last long I&#039;m sure :-D.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:))Glad you enjoyed it&#8230;won&#8217;t last long I&#8217;m sure :-D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26816</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26816</guid>
		<description>Fornication, Brian, that cracks me up!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fornication, Brian, that cracks me up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26815</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26815</guid>
		<description>Brian,

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!


(sniffle!) Man, I LOVE you guys!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian,</p>
<p>HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!</p>
<p>(sniffle!) Man, I LOVE you guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26814</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26814</guid>
		<description>Yee-haw! Thirty minutes and counting!

I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.

RIDE &#039;EM COWBOY!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yee-haw! Thirty minutes and counting!</p>
<p>I feel like Slim Whitman at the end of Dr. Strangelove.</p>
<p>RIDE &#8216;EM COWBOY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26813</link>
		<dc:creator>Rage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:27:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26813</guid>
		<description>E.E.,FYI, XXX is our resident Referee and Secretary-Treasurer (Don&#039;t flame me, Hog-man: I think it&#039;s generally a good thing, and somebody&#039;s gotta do it. . .).

I agree that CF&#039;s post is a bit harsh, but. . . well, Joe, I know you have a good heart, but I think you mighta just earned this one. Seriously, do you know ANYTHING about Coretta Scott King, other than she was married to Martin?

And since you have a college degree (albeit from Hillside High), you really oughta know better.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.E.,FYI, XXX is our resident Referee and Secretary-Treasurer (Don&#8217;t flame me, Hog-man: I think it&#8217;s generally a good thing, and somebody&#8217;s gotta do it. . .).</p>
<p>I agree that CF&#8217;s post is a bit harsh, but. . . well, Joe, I know you have a good heart, but I think you mighta just earned this one. Seriously, do you know ANYTHING about Coretta Scott King, other than she was married to Martin?</p>
<p>And since you have a college degree (albeit from Hillside High), you really oughta know better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ProudLib</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26812</link>
		<dc:creator>ProudLib</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26812</guid>
		<description>CF--

Touche.

Reading that post was like jumping into the ice bath after you&#039;ve been baking in the sauna.  Refreshing!

You&#039;r post will get pulled shortly, but sometimes a man&#039;s gotta say what a man&#039;s gotta say.

Bush = Worst. President. Ever.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF&#8211;</p>
<p>Touche.</p>
<p>Reading that post was like jumping into the ice bath after you&#8217;ve been baking in the sauna.  Refreshing!</p>
<p>You&#8217;r post will get pulled shortly, but sometimes a man&#8217;s gotta say what a man&#8217;s gotta say.</p>
<p>Bush = Worst. President. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CrusaderX</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26811</link>
		<dc:creator>CrusaderX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:18:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26811</guid>
		<description>CF,Wow, you sure you aren&#039;t a NYC cab driver? :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CF,Wow, you sure you aren&#8217;t a NYC cab driver? :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Santiago</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26810</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Santiago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26810</guid>
		<description>
Da truth shall set you free! CF, u b funny, yo.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.martinlutherking.org/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.martinlutherking.org/&lt;/a&gt;

Viva La Raza Blanco!!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Da truth shall set you free! CF, u b funny, yo.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.martinlutherking.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.martinlutherking.org/</a></p>
<p>Viva La Raza Blanco!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_on/#comment-26809</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 18:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/02/budget_based_onhtml/#comment-26809</guid>
		<description>EE,

If nothing succeeds like success, it&#039;s also true that nothing exceeds like excess.  And times like these call for extreme measures.

I like your email address, BTW: very on-topic.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EE,</p>
<p>If nothing succeeds like success, it&#8217;s also true that nothing exceeds like excess.  And times like these call for extreme measures.</p>
<p>I like your email address, BTW: very on-topic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
