<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Low airfares also key to tourism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:42:45 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20550</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 16:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20550</guid>
		<description>Actually, the Wright Amendment has been amended a couple of times. The original Wright allowed non-stop flights from Love Field to the rest of Texas and states that touched Texas. In 1997, Alabama, Mississippi, and Kansas were added as allowed states. In November of last year, Missouri was added. Southwest, interestingly, now has non-stop flights to Jackson MS, Birmingham AL, and in recent weeks, KC and St. Louis MO. The only state on the amended Wright not served by Southwest? Kansas. Hmmmmmmmmm.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the Wright Amendment has been amended a couple of times. The original Wright allowed non-stop flights from Love Field to the rest of Texas and states that touched Texas. In 1997, Alabama, Mississippi, and Kansas were added as allowed states. In November of last year, Missouri was added. Southwest, interestingly, now has non-stop flights to Jackson MS, Birmingham AL, and in recent weeks, KC and St. Louis MO. The only state on the amended Wright not served by Southwest? Kansas. Hmmmmmmmmm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20549</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20549</guid>
		<description>Joe, would this be another one of your moderate comments?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe, would this be another one of your moderate comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20548</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20548</guid>
		<description>ksfarmgrrl. The Jim Wright Amendment doesn&#039;t allow SouthWest to fly from Dallas to any surrounding state including Kansas and Missouri. But it does not limit Southwest from flying between other cities. Like KC to LA for instance. They cannot fly from Dallas to KC.

Inadequet law? Yes! It was to protect DFW from Love Field competition. It should be repealed.

But in 1997, I&#039;m not for sure it it passed or not. I need to check, but there was an repeal of the Wright Amendment to exclude the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kansas.

Yeah! The Wright Admendment is bad and has been bad for Southwest, but what do you expect from a Democrat like Jim Wright.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ksfarmgrrl. The Jim Wright Amendment doesn&#8217;t allow SouthWest to fly from Dallas to any surrounding state including Kansas and Missouri. But it does not limit Southwest from flying between other cities. Like KC to LA for instance. They cannot fly from Dallas to KC.</p>
<p>Inadequet law? Yes! It was to protect DFW from Love Field competition. It should be repealed.</p>
<p>But in 1997, I&#8217;m not for sure it it passed or not. I need to check, but there was an repeal of the Wright Amendment to exclude the states of Alabama, Mississippi, and Kansas.</p>
<p>Yeah! The Wright Admendment is bad and has been bad for Southwest, but what do you expect from a Democrat like Jim Wright.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ksfarmgrrl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20547</link>
		<dc:creator>ksfarmgrrl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20547</guid>
		<description>I thought there was a &quot;Jim Wright&quot; law that did not allow southwest to fly direct to certain states from Love Field in Dallas.  That is why they can go to KCI in Missouri but not ICT in Kansas. I know there was an effort to change that law. Is it still in effect? Is that why southwest doesnt fly into Wichita?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought there was a &#8220;Jim Wright&#8221; law that did not allow southwest to fly direct to certain states from Love Field in Dallas.  That is why they can go to KCI in Missouri but not ICT in Kansas. I know there was an effort to change that law. Is it still in effect? Is that why southwest doesnt fly into Wichita?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20546</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20546</guid>
		<description>Todd, amen.  This subsidizing of AirTran stinks of a conflict of interest.

Joe Williams, indeed.  Southwest&#039;s entrance into the Wichita market would be the only thing that could possibly redeem the idiotic subsidies for Airtran.  However, expect Airtran to fight it like hell.  And although I wasn&#039;t in Wichita when the deal was made, one would think that Airtran must have insisted on some kind of an exclusivity clause to keep Southwest out of the market.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Todd, amen.  This subsidizing of AirTran stinks of a conflict of interest.</p>
<p>Joe Williams, indeed.  Southwest&#8217;s entrance into the Wichita market would be the only thing that could possibly redeem the idiotic subsidies for Airtran.  However, expect Airtran to fight it like hell.  And although I wasn&#8217;t in Wichita when the deal was made, one would think that Airtran must have insisted on some kind of an exclusivity clause to keep Southwest out of the market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darrell Fanestil</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20545</link>
		<dc:creator>Darrell Fanestil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20545</guid>
		<description>I just searched Orbitz for flights to/from San Diego to Wichita or Kansas City, to KS on Jan 19 and return on Jan 26.   Cheapest quoted to/from ICT is $875 per person or to/from MCI is $216 per person.  Thus. for my wife and me to visit her hospitalized 96 year-old Mother over that time would cost $1,318 via Wichita.

DDF
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just searched Orbitz for flights to/from San Diego to Wichita or Kansas City, to KS on Jan 19 and return on Jan 26.   Cheapest quoted to/from ICT is $875 per person or to/from MCI is $216 per person.  Thus. for my wife and me to visit her hospitalized 96 year-old Mother over that time would cost $1,318 via Wichita.</p>
<p>DDF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kansassam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20544</link>
		<dc:creator>kansassam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20544</guid>
		<description>Mid Continent would make a great place for the arena.. look at all the parking available!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mid Continent would make a great place for the arena.. look at all the parking available!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20543</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20543</guid>
		<description>Mid Continent is a gigantic welfare momma.  Make her earn her own way and kick her off the public teat.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mid Continent is a gigantic welfare momma.  Make her earn her own way and kick her off the public teat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Huie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20542</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Huie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:15:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20542</guid>
		<description>If we must socialize air transportation why not establish a shuttle to KCI?  Then one could just fly to wherever one wants.  This is what was recommended way back when this all started, using Air Midwest which was located here at the time.  There is nothing wrong with flying a small plane for a short distance.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we must socialize air transportation why not establish a shuttle to KCI?  Then one could just fly to wherever one wants.  This is what was recommended way back when this all started, using Air Midwest which was located here at the time.  There is nothing wrong with flying a small plane for a short distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Wulff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20541</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Wulff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20541</guid>
		<description>I was wondering why we support an airline that only flies east?  This is really no subside unless you are flying in that direction.  It would seem to me that an airline flying in all directions out of wichita would be the one to subsudize if you want all of Kansas to help with this.  This would be the only way to stop people from driving to Kansas City or Oklahoma City  for low fares.  Two esamples with my family recently.  LA to Wichita cheaper fro KC or Oklahoma City by $600.  Flight to Louisville $300 cheaper from Kansas City.  There just simply is no comparsion.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering why we support an airline that only flies east?  This is really no subside unless you are flying in that direction.  It would seem to me that an airline flying in all directions out of wichita would be the one to subsudize if you want all of Kansas to help with this.  This would be the only way to stop people from driving to Kansas City or Oklahoma City  for low fares.  Two esamples with my family recently.  LA to Wichita cheaper fro KC or Oklahoma City by $600.  Flight to Louisville $300 cheaper from Kansas City.  There just simply is no comparsion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20540</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20540</guid>
		<description>Good point, Joe.  While I am not a fan of either Southwest or Airtran, at least SW has a much better safety record than Airtran, previously known as &quot;Value Jet&quot;...
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point, Joe.  While I am not a fan of either Southwest or Airtran, at least SW has a much better safety record than Airtran, previously known as &#8220;Value Jet&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20539</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20539</guid>
		<description>I believe Mid-Continent will get its support. Once the new airport is built and we can get more passenger traffic through it, we can see a real possiblity of SouthWest coming in.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Mid-Continent will get its support. Once the new airport is built and we can get more passenger traffic through it, we can see a real possiblity of SouthWest coming in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_al/#comment-20538</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2006/01/low_airfares_alhtml/#comment-20538</guid>
		<description>More subsidies on the horizon?  The city gives millions to Airtran for low fares, and yet how often is Airtran listed in the Sunday paper for lowest fares anywhere?  Almost never.

What is wrong with this picture?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More subsidies on the horizon?  The city gives millions to Airtran for low fares, and yet how often is Airtran listed in the Sunday paper for lowest fares anywhere?  Almost never.</p>
<p>What is wrong with this picture?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
