The PNAC plan is so deeply flawed, created by those so blinded by their lust for power, as not to be unable to see that there is no endgame.

The best parallel to those in the PNAC “think-tank” is Truman Capote’s “In Cold Blood,” where neither of two killers was capable of the crime, but together they formed a third personality. That “personality” killed the entire “Cutter family.”

Somehow we create monsters like Bush and Sharon, and though disgusted by what they do, we seem so helpless, and have little power or will to stop them. I hate to think that we are becoming that third personality.

The only reason that Abdel-Halim Khaddam would make statements likes those would be under a direct threat from the Mossad.

Abdel-Halim Khaddam would know that Syrians would come after him and kill him for such a treasonous act.

The Mossad probably had the antidote for the poison already in his system right there. They’ve done that before with an Egyptian and threatened Arafat’s wife not to have an autopsy done on Arafat to detect that poisoning. Arafat Billions would have been declared “Terrorist money” and she would not have received a dime. She declined to have an autopsy, and got the money instead.

Israel is determined to make trouble with Syria, to open the way for an eventual invasion of Lebanon.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/200601/s1540173.htm

Report: U.S. preparing NATO for possible strike on Iran

Looks like our soldiers aren’t through dying for Israel’s right to make “terrorists” just yet. Is this something which we Americans really want to do?

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/664518.html

Does Bush care if the price of gasoline becomes $5..$10…$15…

Iran says they have 1 million martyrs ready to blow-us-up.

Newsworthy?

Note: Wouldn’t it be easier to constrain Israel, form an Independent Palestinian State, thus making peace with the Arabs than to follow this crazy man Bush all the way to Hell?

Rachel was an unarmed peace activist trying to prevent the demolition of the home of a Palestinian pharmacist, his wife, and three children. She believed that nonviolent direct action against the Israeli occupation would make Palestinians, and also Israelis and Americans, more secure. Rachel stood there to protect a home and family in Gaza because the United States and Israel rejected a UN proposal to send international human rights monitors there. International activists went instead. Rachel stood there protesting illegal home demolitions that the United States opposes on the record yet fails to stop — destruction that we support with billions in annual military aid to Israel for bulldozers, Apache helicopters, F-16s, and more.

Note: This is part of the Israeli way of creating “terrorists.” After all, you can’t have a good ole “war on Terrorism” without a goodly supply of “terrorists.”

On March 19, 2003, Richard Boucher, spokesman for the State Department, noted in reference to Rachel: “When we have the death of an American citizen, we want to see it fully investigated. That is one of our key responsibilities overseas, to look after the welfare of American citizens and to find out what happened in situations like these.”

In Congress, Representative Brian Baird of Washington state introduced a bill calling on the US government to “undertake a full, fair, and expeditious investigation into the death of Rachel Corrie.” Others warned that passage was unlikely because of strong sentiment in Congress to avoid any legislation that appears critical of Israel. Nevertheless, 56 House members have signed the bill.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2004/03/18/seeking_answers_from_israel/

http://archive.gulfnews.com/opinion/columns/region/10007976.html

Rachel Corrie.

http://www.rachelcorrie.org/

{ Keep in mind that our wonderful State Dept will not act on this, so the parents have filled suit in Federal Court }.

Witnesses at the scene of Rachel trying to stop the demolition of Palestinian homes { 17,000 } said she first yelled: “They’ve broken my back.”

Then, after the bulldozer backed-up, crushing her for the second time, there was only silence.

Would a story or a mention of the plight of Rachel’s parents to find justice through our State Dept. be anti-Semitic?

Is there a story there worth reporting, or should that be just swept under the rug?

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/663890.html

Are you the least bit curious?

Not the Arabs.

Not Al-Qaida.

Not Hizbollah.

Not “Terrorism.”

Not “Terrorists.”

How could Israel not be on that list?