As reported in Carrie Rengers’ column, state Sen. Carolyn McGinn, R-Sedgwick, recently said she’s willing to explore whether Kansas should allow wine to be shipped into and out of the state.
Under current state wine law (one of the nation’s most restrictive), it’s illegal to ship wine directly to consumers either interstate or within the state, which puts a cork in efforts to develop Kansas’ fledgling wine industry (yes, it exists, and holds promise for both small farmers and tourism).
To its credit, the Kansas Legislature earlier this year passed some new laws to help Kansas’ 10 commercial wineries, including a provision that would allow them to double production.
So why not let them ship their expanded product to expanded markets? Why not let consumers order what they want? The state needs to get out of the way.
Posted by Randy Scholfield
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- Skeptic on Jail consultants straining patience
- Chas on Health care reform would save state money
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Politico on Health care reform would save state money
- Politico on So they said
- Pleefer on Open thread 11/22
- cosmos_originally on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Phantom on Open thread 11/22
- Rage on Open thread 11/22

6 Comments
What??? The KBOE isn/t having the alchohol removed from the wine?
It’s OK, JM. They’re only to be used for religious ceremony.
Whew . . . for a minute there . . .
But ONLY for religious ceremonies at schools….the Board of Evangelism has spoken…
Amen and Merry…Hic.. Christmas.
All jokes aside, it is so typically “Kansas” to hold back progress in any form. It is very easy to see why we are the butt of so many jokes. I suppose there are people that think if we produce wine in our state that there will be a sharp increase in winos.