Limits on payday loans make sense

There’s a place for payday loan companies, which typically serve credit-challenged customers who can’t get conventional bank loans. But as Eagle reporter Deb Gruver’s articles on these flourishing operations showed, it’s easy for some Kansans to get caught in a vicious cycle of juggling multiple loans — sometimes as many as 15 at once.
That’s why it’s good that state Rep. Steve Brunk, R-Wichita, and other state lawmakers will look next session at revising payday loan regulations with an eye to limiting how many total loans a customer can have at one time.
This would ensure reasonable protections of consumers who are in an especially vulnerable financial spot.
Posted by Randy Scholfield

176 Comments

  1. Joe Blow
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    Please government, save us from ourselves. Please.

  2. Brian
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 7:38 am | Permalink

    How about limiting the usurious interest rates while you’re at it?

  3. Ray Thomas
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    So, some people exhibit poor judgment, and all of us will have a law limiting how much or how often the rest of us can borrow? What is wrong with this picture?

    This is a bad idea, lousy legislation, and smacks of ‘big brotherism’.

  4. Posted December 26, 2005 at 9:41 am | Permalink

    All of the of these posters are correct in my opinion. I am cutting and pasting a rant from my blog site on this subject.

    Oh, and by the way, don’t think that the people owning these businesses are “mom & pop” pawn-shop type folk – Nope, these are big corporations behind this scandal.

    Wednesday, December 21, 2005PayDay Lenders: A Very Serious Subject . . .

    I want to express my appreciation to Deb Gruver for her two recent Eagle stories on the burgeoning growth of PayDay loan businesses in Wichita. In my view these stories have been long overdue. Each week my family and I drive at least once from our near-east side home to downtown and then back again. My children have invented a game whereby each of them attempts to collect instances of newly opened PayDay loan businesses, Cash-for-Car-title-Loan businesses, and etc. This game has been going on for several weeks and there are no indications that it will be over any time soon. Howard Karger in his book – ShortChanged: Life and Debt in the Fringe Economy (2005, p. 73) says “In fact, there are now more payday loan shops in America than McDonald’s restaurants.”

    I want to be up front, I have a decided bias against these businesses and I have written my state representative expressing my concerns. I don’t believe that there is a viable “other side” to the story. In fact, it offends me when a purveyor of one of these “fringe economy” (read – “predatory lending”) businesses say that they are merely filling a market niche untouched by others. To me, this would be tantamount to Dr. Kevorkian saying that his assisted suicides offer patients an alternative to anesthesia. Sorry, the reasoning doesn’t make sense, and I don’t find it amusing.

    As Ms. Gruver pointed out in her article, the annual percentage rate (APR) on PayDay loans can run in the 400% range. Advocates of this business practice say that their usual customers are professional, between 30 and 40 years of age, and making between $30,000 and $40,000 per year. The argument is that “these are not poor people, don’t feel sorry for them, because they are making maybe admittedly stupid choices by accepting such credit terms – they are none-the-less making free choices from a position of individual freedom”. Sounds pretty high-minded, doesn’t it?

    The truth is, in today’s fringe economy, it is very easy for people making the amounts of money listed above to be “functionally poor” as described by Howard Karger in his book cited above. It is very easy for people making 30k to 40k per year to have such high debt and an absence of assets that the sum of their monthly and yearly income-to-debt ratio is a negative number. Hence, for all intents and purposes these people are poor. Provide a financial emergency, like a car breaking down, and these same people become desperate. Given sufficient desperation, anyone (and not just from greed) will turn to these predatory lenders.

    I am a “live and let live” person, and I am troubled whenever government decides it must “take actions to protect people from themselves”. In Ms. Gruver’s article, Representative Brunk speaks of such protection. Instead of limiting how many PayDay loans a person can have, I would like to suggest a two-pronged alternative.

    The first prong would involve, instead of passing laws that facilitate these businesses’ preying on people, how about the Kansas legislature passing a law that says the APR of any loan cannot exceed 30% in Kansas. It seems reasonable to me that anyone taking 30% APR on a loan can make enough money to stay in business. I believe that if our legislature had the courage to pass such a law, these predatory lenders would go scurrying to more hospitable environments and I would say “good riddance”.

    This first prong would not be enough, however. Also Credit Unions and Savings & Loans should be encouraged to make convenient/accessible small loans with terms that would allow, say, a six month repayment plan. This second prong has been demonstrated to be effective, most notably in North Carolina. See the following link to the success story of the North Carolina Self-Help Credit Union – http://www.self-help.org/. It can be done a better way than it is now. It can be a win-win situation for the lender AND the borrower.

    Ms. Gruver has helped us recognize the problem, let us not stop now. Let us not stop until we have resolved this problem. Our city will be a better place to live for EVERYBODY.

    Thank you.Steven E.

    See Deb Gruver’s articles with the following links:

    http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/business/consumer/13431936.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

    http://www.kansas.com/mld/kansas/business/consumer/13447081.htm?template=contentModules/printstory.jsp

    I apologize for the length here. The WE folk will have to understand that providing the post they did for me, is like serving up something on Zionism for Ed.

    Unfortunately, I have free-lance work calling me, so I won’t be able to respond much on this subject. I have bills to pay, but fortunately NOT TO PAYDAY Lenders. I urge taking a look at the book cited above.

  5. Ray Thomas
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 9:47 am | Permalink

    Additional question on potential laws to limit the number of loans a person could get. How would that ever be enforced? Would there be a new state bureau of loan enforcement where every loan is registered?

    Yes…people making a decent wage get into credit trouble..and who’s fault is that? The people with the credit cards! When is this country ever going to wake up and realize the old idea of personal responsibilty is NOT a bad thing??

  6. Damoon
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 10:06 am | Permalink

    Great post, Steven. You are right on. Corporations should be held more accountable for their predatory business practices. Just like the tabacco industry, the credit industry also needs to be regulated to minimize it’s victimization of desperate or vulnerable consumers. It’s the right thing to do.

  7. J M Walker
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    My question is: Who are the people backing these predatory loan outfits? Is it a basically the same outfit using different names? Mob connected? Any law enforcement groups looking into the owners?

    It seems to me that an honest, upright business wouldn’t touch something as insidious as these loan shark outfits. Only sleaze and scavengers would operate on the fringe these outfits operate on.

    I like the idea of restricting loans to 30% interest. It would help drive the predators out of state, at least.

  8. flike
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 11:13 am | Permalink

    Ray and Joe, if you’re correct then why not just eliminate laws dealing with usury?

    And are you arguing that loansharking is merely MSM “spin” wherein the victims are really the perpetrators?

    I’d encourage everybody to learn about “the rule of 72.” (for those who know a little math, ln 2 = 0.7, approximately; the rule of 72 is actually the rule of 69, but this is somewhat pendantic).

    http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial_s&hl=en&q=%22the+rule+of+72%22+compound+interest&btnG=Google+Search

    The magic behind the “magic of compounding interest” can become the demon of doubling principal much, much faster than reasonable humans can anticipate. Especially young humans with families to support.

    And especially at Christmas. Yours is a Christian idea, Steven E., and one that I support.

  9. Joe Williams
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 11:34 am | Permalink

    You know! I see them popped up all over town. Big time. They advertise on TV, billboards, flashy LED outdoor screens and the like.

    But everytime I drive by one, I take a look, and it seems like there is nobody there. So I don’t know who is getting these loans or if there are a bunch of people I’m not seeing.

    Honestly I believe many payday loan opperations will go away, because there are too many for the compitition and market to handle. It was like wireless outfits in the late 1990’s. They were everywhere, now we don’t see all that many, except the mobile phone companies outlet stores themselves.

  10. Posted December 26, 2005 at 1:29 pm | Permalink

    This is an interesting subject. One of the leaders in the Fringe economy is a business known as “ACE Cash Express” – this business expects its total revenue for fiscal 2005 to range between $265 million and $270 million.

    Another big player in these businesses is a character brought to you by the Clinton administration, viz. William “Billy” Webster, Clinton’s former director of scheduling and advance. He is the CEO and cofounder of Advance America. In addition to charging exorbitant interest rates to working people, Advance America “partnered with nonprofits” in 2004 to “get out the vote”. They doubled their goal of signing 50K new voters because of the availability of voter-registration forms in their more than 2,000 Advance America locations in 29 states.

    Who is backing these operations? Well off corporations and CEO thugs who are a step below your average criminal.

    I am all in favor of individual responsibility — this is acutally one of the good messages of the Republican party. I just hope that they can see their way clear to extend the concept to “Corporate Responsibilty” — I am not holding my breath on that one, however.

    I read in the NY Times this weekend where many Wall Street Banking firms are holding signicant percentages of the stock offerings of off-shore gambling casinos. These businesses are technically illegal in the United States. These business generate high profits, however. They are illegal in the U.S., unless, of course, you are a wealthy Corporate sponsor of these businesses.

    This kind of stuff just makes me shake my head.

    [the sources for the numbers above, is the book I cite in my original post]

  11. Posted December 26, 2005 at 1:33 pm | Permalink

    should have been”on-line off-shore gambling casinos”

  12. wilson
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 3:06 pm | Permalink

    Steven E., I thought you were a “live and let live” person. But you propose to limit the economic freedom of individuals to manage their finances as they see fit. I understand that you believe these people are not handling their finances wisely. But imnposing your judgment of wise personal finance practice on them is not, I would submit, “live and let live.”

    With regard to the encouragement of credit unions and other businesses to make loans that they currently don’t make, how exactly would we do that? I fear that any solution means subsidy, and that means less economic freedom for us who must pay the subsidy.

  13. Ed Friedemann
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 4:09 pm | Permalink

    Laws governing predatory schemes practiced by some is not a bad thing. The US constitution speaks directly to such behavior from government and protecting those in our society with less fortunate financial management skills { without impeding legitimate business } should be a moral imperative. Nothing is lost by expanding laws governing fraud to include shysters.

  14. Ray Thomas
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 5:23 pm | Permalink

    Flike..

    You missed my point entirely. The concept of the government telling us how many loans we can take out is abhorrent to me. What is next? The government telling us what kind of car we can ‘afford’?Those people who have overextended themselves were not forced to charge that stereo system, buy that new car or spend too much. Their abuse of credit is not a good excuse for the government to step in and tell the rest of us how much money we can or cannot borrow.

    This has nothing to do with the rule of 78’s (which, check the laws, is illegal). Nor does it have with usury rates. My objection is to the government telling us all whether we can borrow money or not.

  15. Posted December 26, 2005 at 5:25 pm | Permalink

    Of course we need more government intervention. People are too stupid to deal with their own finances. That’s why we NEED this legislation.

    A little big brother is a good thing once you expand it.

  16. Ray Thomas
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Sorry to say, Galahad, but your thought of government taking care of use from cradle to grave has been tried. The former Soviet Union tried it for decades, and it didn’t work.

    Socialism accomplishes nothing more than lower the standard of living for everyone. It destroys individual initiative. It creates a total welfare state. Look at the grand experiment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

    No thanks, I do not want the government running my life, whether it is telling me how many loans I can have or where I will work.

  17. Posted December 26, 2005 at 6:52 pm | Permalink

    I am not sure who to direct this response to, but let me clarify a few things.

    First of all, there is considerable money in short term loans to people who have less than great credit. Why do you think there are 61 businesses of this sort in Wichita, KS. I think C.U.’s would be able to put together products that would be of interest to the folks who take out these PayDay loans. I think the C.U.’s can offer a cheaper loan in terms of the APR interest and a more reasonable payback scheme. They will be able make money; they will need to change how they do things and assume some risks.

    I am suggesting limiting the ability of corporations to charge outlandish rates of interest. 400% APR is absurd. Yes I would like to limit the freedoms of these corporations in the same way I would like to limit the financial gain of those companies that profit at the expense of the environment via pollution.

    I think the pollution metaphor is a good one for these PayDay lenders. These are lenders who strap people with high interest rates and that money is going toward wealthy corporations in other parts of the country. This money is not going toward the health of the economy here in Wichita – where it might otherwise if it was not going toward these predatory interest rates. PayDay lenders may not poison the environment, but they sap local economies of their vital resources.

    PayDay borrowers, I am assuming declare bankruptcy at a greater rate than traditional borrowers. Who do you think ultimately pays for that? You and me in terms of court costs, higher interest rates, etc.

    I know there are some people who have a free-market brain-freeze and to suggest regulation is heresy. I think the free market is a good solution for many problems. I don’t think the model works well for all problems, however — education and health care come to mind as obvious examples. I know I won’t change the mind of some free market zombies, but I think in time you will come to see the error of your ways on your own. I will pray for your soul in the meantime.

    Thanks.

  18. Falcone
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 7:59 pm | Permalink

    Payday loans stink at first sight, but it’s not like anybody is forcing people to use their services, it’s a choice. Granted, it’s a stupid choice, but how do you legislate away stupidity? People make bad choices all the time. Doing business with payday loan companies is just another stupid choice. I would imagine the default rate on these kind of loans is pretty high, hence the exorbant interest rates. We would do well to remember, people who get themselves in this kind of situation in the first place generally have a history of not paying what they owe. You don’t get good interest rates if you don’t have good credit.

    People who use payday loan services made their own bed. Is it wrong to expect them to lie in it?

  19. Posted December 26, 2005 at 10:47 pm | Permalink

    “Of course we need more government intervention. People are too stupid to deal with their own finances. That’s why we NEED this legislation.”

    Okay, this is the REAL Galahad saying that I did not write that crap.

    How do you know if the true Galahad has written something or whether it’s that troll “steve”?

    Very simple, my friends: my posts are insightful and well written.

    Unlike that this former post, typical of guy that sells his an orifice for anonymous sex with other men. That’s not me.

    From now on, I’ll be posting UNDER ANOTHER NAME.

    ANY FURTHER POSTS FROM GALAHAD WILL NOT BE FROM THIS GALAHAD.

    Thanks for your patience.

    The post-er formerly known as Galahad.

  20. steve
    Posted December 26, 2005 at 10:54 pm | Permalink

    Normally, I wouldn’t dignify a charge like Galahad’s with a response, but it’s absolutely NOT true that I have anonymous sex with other men.

    I usually ask them to buy me a drink first.

    Hope that clears that up.

    steve

  21. Posted December 26, 2005 at 11:27 pm | Permalink

    Boys, can we please return to the subject? This is too important.

  22. Gail
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:04 am | Permalink

    Well, the fact that they exist shows that common sense has lost–these free-market idiots have no problem with legalized usuary but would crap a gold brick if I wanted to be able to sell my kidney to the highest bidder, grow my own cannibas, or run a house of prostitution.

    Some things should not be a matter of choice . . . stealing from desperate people who don’t understand the ramifications of high-interest loans is one of them.

    You “rugged individualists” don’t get it–what do people do when they’re up against a wall and have nothing to lose? Is it going to be my or your car they try to steal? My or your home they break into? My or your wife that has her purse ripped off her shoulder etc. etc.?

  23. wilson
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    I would suggest, Gail, that a “free-market idiot,” if they value free markets because of the connection between economic freedom and political freedom and personal liberty, would allow the things you list: “sell my kidney to the highest bidder, grow my own cannibas [sic], or run a house of prostitution.” I would allow you to do these things if you want, even though I wouldn’t recommend them for myself.

    If someone doesn’t want to allow people to do things like these, I would not say that they believe in free markets. They probably believe in allowing people to do or not do the things they approve of. Based on which set of things they approve of, and which they would disallow, we often classify them as “liberals,” “moderates,” or “conservatives.” They all desire to control the behavior of others to fit what they think is proper.

  24. wilson
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:33 am | Permalink

    It may be possible, Steven E., to distinguish between payday lenders and polluters. A person may not be able to avoid the destructive effects of pollution. Going to a payday lender, however, is a voluntary act.

  25. wilson
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:38 am | Permalink

    To those who believe that using payday lenders leads to social costs such as bankruptcy or crime, there are many other things that lead to this too. I think that most people would not be in favor of laws banning all such activities.

  26. Ed Friedemann
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 6:54 am | Permalink

    The “let them eat cake” attitude of some of our more privileged { never been broke or know the desperation of what it’s like to be broke } posters is indicative of why Marie Antoinette got her head chopped-off during the French revolution. Thou that danger of the guillotine’s revenge is not present now, the callous remark about “it’s their choice” still bears out a pathetic ignorance deserving of such a fate.

  27. Sum1
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 7:03 am | Permalink

    I”m not sure if we need more government intervention. What I would like to see is the interest limited on these sort of loans.

    I fell into this once when I was in college and didnt’ have the money to pay the car insurance. My income was closer to around 10k then. It would have been easy to fall into the cycle of getting another loan to pay for my last loan.It tooks months of shuffling my budget to recover from that one loan.

    Just because a business fills a niche doesn’t mean it’s not preying on people.

  28. Gail
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 10:34 am | Permalink

    wilson–you’ve really drunk the kool-aid, haven’t you?

    Society outlaws certain activities such as drug use, prostitution, child molestation, vandalism, fraud, theft, arson, dui, etc. etc. not because they are moral prudes as you imply, but because those things are BAD FOR SOCIETY.

    Why you think an individual can thrive in a society that tolerates sociopathic behavior, I don’t know, except you seem to value your concept of “freedom” more than you value actual quality of life.

    Using your standards, the finest place on earth to live would be Baghdad, Iraq. They have no government, so they have no law enforcement. Complete and total “freedom” means complete and total chaos.

  29. Posted December 27, 2005 at 10:39 am | Permalink

    Oh, the beauty of free-market solutions to every conceivable human problem. Adoption of such a position does free one up from thinking — that must be part of the appeal.

    The truth is PayDay lenders do fulfill a lending niche. I think this niche needs to be addressed and is the reason I included it as part of my solution up-thread.

    Credit Unions who may start extending lending services to PayDay borrowers will need to start dealing with people they don’t usually do business with. People for whom English is definitely a second language, people who may not smell so good, people who distrust banks, people who are used to being victims of various forms of fraud as a way of life.

    It is interesting to me as some of the above posters allude, conservative Republicans are moral and ethical on every single subject except money – then “anything goes”. (Well, I guess they are not so libertarian on what a woman can do with her own body – are they?). I am clear that I disagree with free-market zombies on what should be controlled or not.

    It is a common practice that employees who work for PayDay lenders have to sign an agreement to not talk about the business to outsiders as a condition of employment. I wonder what it is that they are wanting to hide? Do you suppose they wish to hide the fact that they are such paragons of free-market enterprise??? Or, maybe they are wanting to hide something else??? As Arsenio used to say, makes ya go “Hmmmm….”

    The lobbyist, who helped change Kansas law which now allows these businesses to charge nearly 400% APR lobbies for other economic- health-enhancing businesses, i.e. Indian casinos.

    Regardless, I am pretty sure that the Kansas legislature will not have the guts to limit the amount of profiteering PayDay lenders can perpetrate. Given that, I would be willing to settle for the second part of my plan — figuring out ways to get traditional lenders to serve these non-traditonal borrowers. It has been done in other places. I completely disagree that the status quo is okay.

    Thank you for listening in.

  30. steve
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 10:45 am | Permalink

    I’m really glad that wilson tells me what to think. I wouldn’t have any idea otherwise.

  31. Jed
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 11:54 am | Permalink

    Several of you have stated that borrowing from payday loan operations is a voluntary act. In the strictest sense, yeah it is, but many of the people who borrow from them are the ones whose rent and gas bills have risen much faster than their wages, and who have no other resources left when their 20 year-old car breaks down, or a bill collector is harassing them. These people need another viable alternative before you can call it a voluntary choice.A business that preys on poor people is no business, it’s organized crime, and should be prosecuted as such. 400% interest is not business, it’s storefront loansharking!

  32. Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:03 pm | Permalink

    I used to think that this blog was a viable alternative to sending letters to the editor, etc. One could get pretty quick feedback from different and like-minded people; this was but one of the advantages.

    However, there are so many people posting here under other people’s names (and addresses, etc.) that it occurs to me that this might be a pretty great waste of time. You could say I am slow in waking up and smelling the coffee.

    Any way . . . children, enjoy yourselves.

  33. Jed
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:15 pm | Permalink

    Steven E.,Don’t leave- we need to fight the trolls who want to silence free thought.Also, re. your earlier post, the difference between liberals and conservative is that to liberals, money is immoral and sex is not. To conservatives, sex is immoral and money is not.

  34. Rage
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 12:28 pm | Permalink

    It’d be a serious loss for all of us, Steven. And, crappy security aside, this is one of the better groups I’ve run across.

    I’m pretty busy at present, and I’m a bit late getting back here, so I’m not going to jump in on this subject.

    Very sorry to see this result, (former) Galahad. Don’t let on when you assume your new identity; most of us will recognize you soon enough.

    I suspect the last message from “steve” (no, it wasn’t me!) was to point out that wilson is none@none.com, while steve is Steve@Steve.com. Coincidence? I don’t know. But I’d rather have wilson’s opinion than steve’s trolling any day.

    If we get any more of this crap, I would suggest complaining to the webmaster. Granted, they’re powerless to stop trolls, and they have to determine which IP belonged to which poster, but they could (probably) pass the complaint on to the troll’s ISP.

    Sorry for the long OT post. I now return you to your regularly scheduled program.

  35. Posted December 27, 2005 at 1:47 pm | Permalink

    Rage & Jed,

    Thanks for your comments. The subject of this thread is a serious one to me. I am having a hard time figuring out why I’m taking this one so personally. This subject is something that I need to do more than blog about –I have not figured out what all that means, however.

    I should say that some of my “un-niceness” prevents me from legitimately casting the first stone on troll subject. Having said that, the recent spate of trollishness has been especially bothersome to me. It diminishes all of our experiences.

    I think due to other time demands, I have less patience than usual. I will be coming back from time to time in the short term, and hopefully more later on.

    Thanks again. Apologies for this off-topic digression.

  36. Troll hunter
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 2:20 pm | Permalink

    Actually, Rage & Steven et al.,

    The editors could stop trolldom in its tracks by 1. banning isp addresses, 2. requiring users to register.

    I post on a number of websites that do both.

    It’s not that hard; the Eagle just doesn’t have the will to do it.

    Meanwhile, as one who has had to take it for a long time, I plan on dishing a little out . . .

  37. Rage
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 2:30 pm | Permalink

    Testing 1-2-3 (technical problems?)

  38. Rage
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 2:33 pm | Permalink

    Okay, this will be the third time I’ve attempted to post this.**********************************Webmaster,This is concerning a troll (I know, I know, there’s little you can do–hear me out).

    Several few days ago, someone named “steve,” listing email as “Steve@Steve.com” starting using a bot to harrass the poster know as “Galahad.” Galahad started making small changes in his sig, but the troll followed. See these:

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/fisa_judges_wan.html#comments (Message #69)

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/cal_says_give_m.html#comments (Message #12)

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/boy_thats_a_leg.html#comments (Message #42)

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/be_careful_the_.html#comments (Messages #26 & #58)

    Finally, someone (probably “steve”) posted a false message under Galahad’s sig:http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/limits_on_payda.html#comments (Message #15)

    What do I want? If can you tie to the IP to a ISP, pass the complaint on. That’s all. If if helps, I posted the message from “DorkWithNoLife”, just following one of steve’s, and my backbone provider is ******.***:

    http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/12/fisa_judges_wan.html#comments (Message #70).

    We may have a lost a regular over this, and another is talking about leaving. Please do what you can.

    Thanks,**** ****

  39. XXX
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 4:17 pm | Permalink

    Guys, DON’T GIVE IN TO A TROLL! If we give in to this little peckerwood, he thinks he’s winning. Galahad, I would have credited you with a little more fight. Nobody was fooled by a twit troll. Your style and outlook are halmark. Nobody mistook his writing for yours.

  40. Rage
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 4:40 pm | Permalink

    Well, not nobody. Most of us.

    In fact, I think you should try to reclaim your sig in a few. . .

  41. wilson
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 5:33 pm | Permalink

    Gail, just because I think it’s OK for you to smoke pot if you want, it doesn’t follow that I’m in favor of “child molestation, vandalism, fraud, theft, arson.” These things consist of one person directly harming another. I’m sure you can see the difference, can’t you?

  42. wilson
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 5:34 pm | Permalink

    Steven E., you said “Adoption of such a position does free one up from thinking — that must be part of the appeal.”

    I think the truth is that freedom requires people to think: “Is this payday loan the best thing for me to do?”

    I think you are proposing that the government do a lot of our thinking for us. For credit unions, too, by deciding what types of loans they should be offering.

  43. J M Walker
    Posted December 27, 2005 at 5:54 pm | Permalink

    wilson,Leveling the playing field is something I have no pronlem with the government doing. Protecting its citizens is something I have no problem with, What is being suggested is that the STATE government look at limiting loan rates.

    People do get in financial difficulties (re: jobs; pay; medical insurance; all hammered by the Democrats). It only makes sense that the sleaze bags waiting in the wings to take advantage of these people have their larcenous rates restricted.

    I don’t think that amounts to restraint of trade, or limits anyone in making a decent living. It would allow the person a chance to use the loan as a crutch when needed. That’s a good thing.

  44. Posted December 27, 2005 at 6:53 pm | Permalink

    Galahad is still here. I’m just changing my name so troll-boy will have to try to hit a moving target.

    I’m going to post under a lot of names used by trolls in the past, including “Steve.”

    I’m looking forward to when Steve writes, “thanks, Steve, for telling me what to think.”

    What a moron . . . or as he would spell it, “moran.”

  45. Posted December 27, 2005 at 7:00 pm | Permalink

    wilson–the people who make use of “car title loans” do so voluntarily only to the extent that heroin addicts “voluntarily” use opiates.

    Your point about crimes that hurt others is a good one–the problem is that these “businesses” DO hurt others. The cash-strapped people who get preyed upon by these lenders have children, who are then abused by the privation they face as surely as if they were locked in closet.

    If you think these car-title lenders don’t hurt people and families, you don’t get it . . .

  46. Sum1
    Posted December 28, 2005 at 7:33 am | Permalink

    Just a question.

    How are payday loans different from a person going to a loan shark for a fast loan because of hard luck?

    It’s the same only we’ve legalized it.

  47. Posted December 28, 2005 at 2:14 pm | Permalink

    wilson, et al.,

    I am going to concede that overconsumption is part of the problem. There has been an unfortunate cultural shift in attitudes about borrowing. It has become acceptable to many people to have levels of debt that would have been undreamed of just 30 years ago.

    As my good buddy, Howard Karger says:”For example, a sign in one Wells Fargo bank advertised that home equity loans could be used to buy a new car, pay off bills, or go on a vacation. Just a few decades ago, drawing out home equity for these kinds of purchases would have been anathema to homeowners and the conservative banking industry. This represents a dramatic change in the culture of borrowing” (2005, p. 36).

    Having acknowledged the above, the fact is that fixed costs (mortgage, child care, health insurance, vehicles, and taxes) have gone up dramatically over he last few decades. Today, 75% of the paychecks of two person income households go toward these fixed costs.

    wilson, the free market philosophy you are touting works best when players enter into these agreements on relatively even ground. The poor, and increasingly the middle class (through fault of their own, or due to fixed costs that are increasingly hostile to them) aren’t entering into these agreements on equal footing any more.

    I do believe that more traditional lenders will wake up and see that there is a money to be made with these small loans. Better loan alternatives for the under-served, but growing part of our economy (working poor – credit-challenged middle class) is an important part of the solution.

    State usury laws vary quite a bit. Some states, such as New York, outlaw PayDay loans all together. I think that is a good idea.

    Wilson, you and I will never agree on this subject. I have to suspect that the consistency of your being an apologist for these predatory lending companies may mean that you have more than a passing/philosophical interest in these businesses? It’s hard for me to see how anyone could argue that PayDay lenders are a good thing for individual borrowers. Or, how anyone could deny that these businesses deplete a portion of our economy (that has an untoward effect on me – that I did NOT volunteer for).

    wilson, a better way is coming despite your arguments for the status quo.

  48. wilson
    Posted December 28, 2005 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    Steven E., I definitely believe that payday loans, for most people, are not a wise financial strategy. I don’t think I’ve ever said that they are good, and if I gave that impression, I apologize.

    Didn’t the Gruver article say that a change in Kansas law last summer that let lenders charge more fees or interest led to the rapid increase in payday loan stores? I am sure that if interest rates and/or fees were limited, there would be the decrease in payday lenders, as you have stated.

    I think it would be nice if credit unions or traditional financial institutions would make loans to people in need. But people in need are often poor credit risks, and for a bank or whatever to make the loan, they need to charge a correspondingly high interest rate, or fees. Otherwise the bank will probably loose money and go out of business.

    After all, probably most of the people using these payday lenders have already reached the limit on their credit cards, and are probably paying a pretty high interest rate on that debt. Or, their credit is so poor based on past abuses, or it is not yet established, and they can’t get a credit card. In either case, lending to these people is a poor risk, and I think that’s why traditional lenders don’t make these types of loans.

    Now some writers have stated that the availability of loans is what keeps people from committing crimes to get the money they need. But you can’t keep borrowing forever, can you? (Well, actually, it turns out that you can. You can borrow, declare bankruptcy, and you’ll be getting new credit offers pretty soon, say the New York Times.) Taking out a few payday loans, or the new types of credit union loans that some have advocates, may delay the day of reckoning for a while, but I think that most of these people have such deep-rooted problems that no matter how much you gave them, they’d need another loan soon. If no loan is available, then what?

    You know, Steven E. the more payday loan stores open, the more competition there is, and that may bring down the cost of getting a payday loan.

  49. Posted December 28, 2005 at 7:41 pm | Permalink

    wilson,

    Unfortunately there has been a mind-set change in our culture where people appear to think they can keep borrowing forever and never have to worry about paying off debts. Traditional lenders have fostered this idea with credit cards. PayDay lenders also work to get this message out.

    There is a TV commercial where a guy needs a little money for his kids’ Christmas Toys — he goes to a PayDay type lender — they help him out and provide a valuable service (pardon me while I gag on that one). There is an advertising effort to “normalize” using payday lenders – I am very troubled by that.

    Yes, the main reason there are so many of these lenders here is the legislature now allows 390% APR on PayDay loans ($15 for every $100 borrowed). In Montana a top rate of 871% APR is allowed by State law; Wyoming allows up to 780% APR. So, things could be worse in Kansas. I would be interested to know how the lobbying effort convinced our legislators that helping these businesses with their rates was a good idea. I am going to start bugging my State Rep. again to see what she knows.

    I think a credit union could make money on unsecured loans at 28 to 30% APR. Many PayDay lender customers are illegal aliens who are afraid of doing business with a bank and their home cultures did not provide much experience in dealing with banks.

    Another large pool of customers for many payday lenders is military families. These families are people who are definitley cash strapped. Doesn’t seem like the way to treat our troops (who do make big sacrifices for the rest of us), if you ask me.

    If credit unions are to offer lending services to the PD borrowers they will definitely have to undergo some changes. Change is difficult, but less so for lending institutions if it can be demonstrated that interest money is available.

    We see things somewhat differently, but I do appreciate your interest in this topic.

  50. Damoon
    Posted December 29, 2005 at 9:54 am | Permalink

    Enjoyed your editorial in the paper today, Steve. I think you just may influence a change.Good job!

  51. Posted December 29, 2005 at 10:41 am | Permalink

    Thanks for reading.

    Like anything worthwhile in life, it will take a lot of hard work to make much of a change.

    I think this is an area where hard work would be worth it.

  52. Jed
    Posted December 29, 2005 at 12:50 pm | Permalink

    Steven E.,Good editorial! Keep it up and don’t let this issue die; it really needs reform! A lot of us will be backing you. Thanks!

  53. wilson
    Posted December 29, 2005 at 11:00 pm | Permalink

    Steven E., perhaps you said this and I glossed over it, but how do you propose to encourage credit unions or other traditional lenders to start making the loans you say they should make?

    There is no law preventing them from making the loans at the present time, is there?

  54. Posted December 29, 2005 at 11:54 pm | Permalink

    wilson,

    You are right there are no laws preventing CUs from making these loans at this time.

    My plan will involve having the people at CUs see the opportunity that exists here in the context of dealing with borrowers they don’t usually serve. I think the change can be made without the government stepping in to help.

    Having CUs help folks like these borrowers is the place where my plan more or less hinges, and if the CU people won’t help I will be back to square one. Not the first time for me . . . This disappointment, will be an opportunity in disguise, as my father used to say.

    Thanks for asking.

  55. Posted December 30, 2005 at 12:14 am | Permalink

    wilson,

    based on your insightful questions, I wonder if you might know how to help me with my endeavors.

    If you think you could provide anything of use, please make a comment to my URL.

    Your life may be more useful than you know.

    Thanks.

  56. JohnDoe#2
    Posted December 30, 2005 at 2:55 am | Permalink

    “Unfortunately there has been a mind-set change in our culture where people appear to think they can keep borrowing forever and never have to worry about paying off debts. Traditional lenders have fostered this idea with credit cards.”

    maybe they have learned the geo bush economic lesson. borrow and spend.

    seriously, MBNA was the leading donator to the political parties, and hiring of lobbyists with no other reason than to get the bankruptcy laws changed.

    why…so they can continue to suck consumers in to high interest credit card debt, and then block them from declaring bankruptcy.

    it’s all a big business, big returns thing.

    and all this time you thought the govt really cares about the average consumer?

  57. JohnDoe#2
    Posted December 30, 2005 at 2:59 am | Permalink

    people have to borrow there because traditional lenders don’t want high risk customers…like the tote-the-note car lots.

  58. Posted February 16, 2006 at 1:18 pm | Permalink

    It’s too bad that natural selection won’t weed out those who exhibit absolutely no self control over their own finances.

    It is not the government’s job to protect people from themselves. I’ll gladly pay the government to protect me from harm, but just because someone is charging a high price for a product doesn’t mean the government should step in.

    It’s as if we assume we know what’s better for everyone. Just because people of low income typically use more payday loans, its no reason to assume they are of low intelligence.

    Everyone can make their own decisions. The fact that there is so much information out there on payday lending suggests that extremly little research is required. This is not a scam. It’t just expensive.

  59. Biryani
    Posted April 30, 2006 at 6:24 pm | Permalink

    damn corporate amerika!

    check out some of the interest rates that payday loan companies are allowed to charge here, http://www.moneysavingfreetips.com/no-teletrack-payday-loan.html

    Mississippi ($400, 18%)Missouri ($500, 75%)Montana ($300, 25%)Nebraska ($500, 15%)Nevada (no limit, no limit)New Hampshire ($500, no limit)New Mexico (no limit, no limit)

  60. Posted July 25, 2006 at 10:15 am | Permalink

    You can check diferent lending plans on our blog site ( http://www.onlineloansblog.com/index.php?cat=20 ) likeSUB PRIME LENDINGSUB PRIME LENDINGPREDATORY LENDINGDEFINED BENEFIT PLANSand so on……

  61. Posted September 26, 2006 at 2:01 am | Permalink

    i agree it would be very good that such issue will be discusses. but since i just see this online, can i know when this news was?that is totally a assurance and security as well if there limit i think. but then how would that be when the your needs exceeds more on what you limited loans can support? since you reach a certain limit then, how can it be? i think proper planning or management!i have read something about it on http://www.personalcashadvance.net – there lots of articles there.

  62. Posted September 26, 2006 at 10:23 pm | Permalink

    i partly agree with Instant Payday Loans, as far as i am aware i practice good management yet i end up to such thing.

    certainly the solution here is that there really should be limit.

  63. Posted October 4, 2006 at 2:47 am | Permalink

    http://www.penis-enlargement-dream.comhttp://sizegenetics.uv.rohttp://male-enhancement.uv.rohttp://health-store.uv.ro/http://the-device.xhost.ro

  64. Rage
    Posted October 4, 2006 at 3:04 am | Permalink

    Nice try, dickhead. My insomnia is your loss. The site admin is being informed. No one will ever see your ads.

    Now kindly die a horrible, prolonged death. Thanks!

  65. Will
    Posted October 4, 2006 at 3:19 am | Permalink

    Advertising on this blog isn’t legal. I’m not sure what the penalty is exactly, but I do believe incarceration is involved.

  66. Posted October 27, 2006 at 9:11 am | Permalink

    Payday loans stink at first sight, but it’s not like anybody is forcing people to use their services. People make bad choices all the time. Doing business with payday loan companies is just another stupid choice. I would imagine the default rate on these kind of loans is pretty high, hence the exorbant interest rates.People who use payday loan services made their own bed. Is it wrong to expect them to lie in it?

    Read a client’s testimonialon bills.com (http://www.bills.com/paydayloanstestimonial1/) and one can get a better idea about payday loans.

  67. Posted October 27, 2006 at 9:31 am | Permalink

    People making a decent wage get into credit trouble..and who’s fault is that? The people with the credit cards!

    A website that favours people opting for pay day loans is http://www.bills.com/paydayloans/

  68. Posted November 6, 2006 at 5:06 pm | Permalink

    The “let them eat cake” attitude of some of our more privileged { never been broke or know the desperation of what it’s like to be broke } posters is indicative of why Marie Antoinette got her head chopped-off during the French revolution. Thou that danger of the guillotine’s revenge is not present now, the callous remark about “it’s their choice” still bears out a pathetic ignorance deserving of such a fate.

  69. Posted November 6, 2006 at 5:08 pm | Permalink

    http://loan.maybachexelero.org/payday-loan.html

  70. Smit
    Posted November 26, 2006 at 5:16 pm | Permalink

    There are several things that a loan applicant for fast cash payday can doto enhance and hurry up their application form and improve the chances ofsecuring an overnight cash advance. You will have to disclose some personal information in order to receive your overnight payday loan. You will have to provide your name, address and contact number, name of work place or office and position in the company, contact details for work place or office, employers name and address and duration of employment at the said office. This information is asked if you are interested in applying for a fast cash payday loan application to make certain that the applicant is at present in employment. It is also compulsory for quick payday loan applicants to be in their current employment for at least a period of 6 months. You will also be asked to fill in your bank details from a checking or savings account. If the quick payday loan application is without any hitch then the requested sum of money will be wired directly into the account. This guarantees easy access for all our customers any time day or night. Before starting the short fast cash advance it will be advisable to have the details given above ready to submit as this will greatly reduce the time it takes to complete the application form. Taking care of the time when completing the fast cashadvance application form and making sure that the correct data is putforward will also do away with the time required to process a form.

  71. Posted November 26, 2006 at 5:19 pm | Permalink

    This kind of account will offer extra security for the customer of thepayday loan. The savings account payday loans curriculum present thecustomers with even more security than some regular cash advance loans. What a client must first do is apply for a savings account payday loan online using a completely secure Internet connection to guarantee security and privacy. Once you get the payday loan savings account approved the sum of money you asked for is put through your bank account. You only have to wait for all electronic transactions to clear before picking up the cash at your convenience. Many cash transactions are processed in this manner, in all kinds of companies, and it has proven to be a completely safe and secure way of delivering and receiving cash. The added bonus of this method of receiving short term payday loans is the speedy delivery anywhere. Applying for a savings account payday loan is totally kept under wraps so it is discreet and quite a different process than applying for a regular loan. You do not even have to prepare a financial portfolio to take to a bank manager to apply for funds. This method is restrictive and for most people daunting. The savings account payday loans allow the customers to keep hold of their privacy and confidential documents. On securing a savings account payday loan the money is sent directly to the savings account of your choice meaning there is no check to cash and no third parties involved.

  72. Posted November 28, 2006 at 7:29 pm | Permalink

    but i think i still comes down on how one getting a personal payday loan should use it for. sometimes there are sorts which get personal payday loan though it’s unneccessary.

    http://www.personalcashadvance.net/500-personal-loan/500-dollar-personal-loan.htm

  73. Posted November 28, 2006 at 7:31 pm | Permalink

    but i think i still comes down on how one getting a personal payday loan should use it for. sometimes there are sorts which get personal payday loan though it’s unneccessary.

    http://www.personalcashadvance.net/500-personal-loan/500-dollar-personal-loan.htm

  74. Posted December 8, 2006 at 8:19 pm | Permalink

    My advice is to try and avoid payday loans. See if you can get a loan from a family member or friend first. If you cannot then maybe a payday loan is the only alternative you may face. Payday loans can give you immediate cash, but must be repaid in 1 to 2 weeks. Also the high interest rates will most likely make the payday loan more costly then most people can handle. Just say no.

  75. Posted December 8, 2006 at 8:21 pm | Permalink

    My advice is to try and avoid payday loans. See if you can get a loan from a family member or friend first. If you cannot then maybe a payday loan is the only alternative you may face. Payday loans can give you immediate cash, but must be repaid in 1 to 2 weeks. Also the high interest rates will most likely make the payday loan more costly then most people can handle. Just say no.

  76. Brad
    Posted December 11, 2006 at 11:26 pm | Permalink

    SHUT THEM DOWN. These loan sharks are feeding on people that are either in a circumstance that they cannot recover from – even with the Payday loan – or they cannot manage their finances – in which case the Payday loan will only make things worse. These loan places are no different than a scum-lord that feeds on small loans to disabled people until they receive their next check. If you ever have a loved one that falls into their trap you will wish these places were out of business.

  77. Posted April 6, 2007 at 6:42 am | Permalink

    Can do better with payday loan.How bad credit cash loan works.

  78. Posted April 6, 2007 at 6:45 am | Permalink

    http://www.badcreditcashloan.us/badcreditcashloan-how-it-works.htm

    we can do better with payday loan.

  79. Posted April 6, 2007 at 6:58 am | Permalink

    Better paydayloan

    http://www.badcreditcashloan.us/badcreditcashloan-how-it-works.htm

  80. Posted April 6, 2007 at 6:59 am | Permalink

    easy payday for uhttp://cash-quick.biz/cash-quick-how-it-works.htm

  81. Posted April 6, 2007 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    Great, the blog is being spammed.

  82. Posted May 10, 2007 at 8:36 am | Permalink

    http://www.18interraciallinks.com/http://www.40inchpluslinks.com/http://www.8thstreetlatinaslink.com/

  83. Posted May 10, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    http://www.allinclusivepasslinks.com/http://www.allinternallinks.com/http://www.allrealitypasslinks.com/

  84. Posted May 10, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    http://www.allsitesaccesslinks.com/http://www.allstarporngirlslinks.com/http://www.aluckystrangerlinks.com/

  85. Posted May 10, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    http://www.asiancreamypieslinks.com/http://www.assparadelinks.com/http://www.assplunderinglinks.com/

  86. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    http://www.asstrafficlinks.com/http://www.ballhoneyslinks.com/http://www.bangbrosnetworklinks.com/

  87. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    http://www.barefootmaniacslinks.com/http://www.bigassadventurelinks.com/http://www.bigcockteenaddictionlinks.com/

  88. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    http://www.bigleaguefacialslinks.com/http://www.bigmouthfulslinks.com/http://www.bignaturalslink.com/

  89. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:04 am | Permalink

    http://www.bigtitpatrollinks.com/http://www.bigtitsroundasseslinks.com/http://www.bjsandwichlinks.com/

  90. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    http://www.blackdickslatinchickslinks.com/http://www.blackmotherfuckerslinks.com/http://www.blinddatebangerslinks.com/

  91. Posted May 10, 2007 at 9:05 am | Permalink

    http://www.boygirlbanglinks.com/http://www.boysfirsttimelinks.com/http://www.brandibellelinks.com/

  92. Posted June 2, 2007 at 10:29 am | Permalink

    http://sexxoasis.info x

  93. Posted June 2, 2007 at 10:30 am | Permalink

    http://sexxoasis.info x

  94. Posted June 3, 2007 at 5:58 am | Permalink

    http://sexxearch.info x

  95. Posted July 10, 2007 at 12:46 pm | Permalink

    sale@mp3.com

  96. Posted July 13, 2007 at 5:29 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  97. Posted July 13, 2007 at 9:08 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  98. Posted July 18, 2007 at 11:56 pm | Permalink

    I never thought about it like that, to be honest.I would never dream of using Money Mart. I don’t know many people on welfare. My friends are most professionals who pride themselves on how they spend their money. At least that’s what they say.

    Everybody does have expensive habits. The more money you make, the more money you spend. Most of things you buy, you don’t need.

  99. Posted July 21, 2007 at 7:25 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  100. Posted July 22, 2007 at 3:58 am | Permalink

    If you are new to to the industry of payday loans, you have option to learn about this athttp://www.loanseye.com/payday-loans/

  101. Posted July 22, 2007 at 10:18 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  102. Posted July 23, 2007 at 3:49 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  103. Posted July 24, 2007 at 8:05 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  104. Posted July 24, 2007 at 11:51 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  105. Posted July 26, 2007 at 7:05 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  106. Posted July 26, 2007 at 1:37 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  107. Posted July 27, 2007 at 7:48 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  108. littlejohn
    Posted July 27, 2007 at 8:39 am | Permalink

    I have been poor, and I have been not so poor. These Payday loans places serve a valuable service. THey give short term loans to people who cannot receive them. Big deal. $15 for $100? for a week or two? THis stuff happened all the time in the military. It worked fine. Pay the bill! How much would you let them charge? 30% per annum? Let’s see, for a $100 loan that is about $30 interest per annum. So for 2 weeks, that’s about $1.50. So, they should collect less that it would cost to write the loan? Get real, quit trying to nanny state everything. The government is not the answer to everything. I know that is a big surprise to many of you socialists

  109. Posted July 27, 2007 at 7:10 pm | Permalink

    cheap@giag.com

  110. Posted July 27, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  111. Posted July 28, 2007 at 12:26 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  112. Posted July 28, 2007 at 2:22 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  113. Posted July 28, 2007 at 3:58 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  114. Posted July 28, 2007 at 5:37 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  115. Posted July 28, 2007 at 7:20 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  116. Posted July 28, 2007 at 8:53 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  117. Posted July 28, 2007 at 10:38 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  118. Posted July 28, 2007 at 12:12 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  119. Posted July 28, 2007 at 1:54 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  120. Posted July 28, 2007 at 3:42 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  121. Posted July 28, 2007 at 9:14 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  122. Posted July 28, 2007 at 10:53 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  123. Posted July 29, 2007 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  124. Posted July 29, 2007 at 12:30 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  125. Posted July 29, 2007 at 2:05 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  126. Posted July 29, 2007 at 3:42 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  127. Posted July 29, 2007 at 5:19 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  128. Posted July 29, 2007 at 6:50 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  129. Posted July 29, 2007 at 8:48 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  130. Posted July 29, 2007 at 10:33 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  131. Posted July 29, 2007 at 12:23 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  132. Posted July 29, 2007 at 2:06 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  133. Posted July 29, 2007 at 3:43 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  134. Posted July 29, 2007 at 5:27 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  135. Posted July 29, 2007 at 7:24 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  136. Posted July 29, 2007 at 8:57 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  137. Posted July 30, 2007 at 2:02 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  138. Posted July 30, 2007 at 3:35 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  139. Posted July 30, 2007 at 5:12 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  140. Posted July 30, 2007 at 6:48 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  141. Posted July 30, 2007 at 8:33 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  142. Posted July 30, 2007 at 10:42 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  143. Posted July 30, 2007 at 12:39 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  144. Posted July 30, 2007 at 3:19 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  145. Posted August 3, 2007 at 12:59 am | Permalink

    Listed below are links to weblogs that reference pfizer’s viagra online:

  146. Posted August 5, 2007 at 2:23 pm | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  147. Posted August 5, 2007 at 5:45 pm | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  148. Posted August 5, 2007 at 10:38 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  149. Posted August 10, 2007 at 1:26 am | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  150. Posted August 10, 2007 at 8:37 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  151. Posted August 10, 2007 at 4:47 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  152. Posted August 10, 2007 at 8:09 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  153. Posted August 11, 2007 at 1:59 am | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  154. Posted August 11, 2007 at 8:07 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  155. Posted August 11, 2007 at 11:04 pm | Permalink

    cheap@viagra.com

  156. Posted August 12, 2007 at 2:09 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  157. Posted August 12, 2007 at 5:52 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  158. Posted August 12, 2007 at 7:56 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  159. anonymous
    Posted August 12, 2007 at 8:31 am | Permalink

    Steven E.,

    Credit Unions can only serve customers listed in their charters. Some cover regional areas like SC so they could serve any Sedgwick County resident.

    They do make small loans. I have gotten several $500 – $600 loans, but they cannot make risky loans. If the person(s) cannot reasonably expect to pay the loan back, then cannot legally make the loan since they are putting other people’s money at risk.

    Over the last several months, I have contemplated using these businesses, but I chose not to, even when my ability to meet bills was exceeded by my bills.

    Many of the people using these services are the working poor, and I don’t mean the $30K+ crowd; I am talking about the $24K and under crowd. Once you get started, you can quickly snowball into 20+ loans easily.

    I think limiting the usury to whatever the state law is would help, but we had that system in play better back before they changed the law.

  160. Posted August 12, 2007 at 9:45 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  161. Posted August 12, 2007 at 2:59 pm | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  162. Posted August 12, 2007 at 10:56 pm | Permalink

    cheap@levitra.com

  163. Posted August 14, 2007 at 3:33 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  164. Posted August 14, 2007 at 6:40 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  165. Posted August 14, 2007 at 11:47 am | Permalink

    cheap@cialis.com

  166. Posted August 15, 2007 at 11:39 pm | Permalink

    The efficacy of Viagra, the Pfizer manufactured drug in treating erectile dysfunction has been found to be extraordinarily brilliant for which the drug has been hailed as a promising treatment for male impotence. Erectile dysfunction patients around the world are scrambling to http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com/buy_viagra_online.html buy viagra online and a whole lot of them are queuing up in front of authentic online pharmacies. Before getting hold of Viagra and administering the drug to the system, you should avail relevant information regarding Viagra via going through http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com/viagra_stories.html viagra stories, Viagra news or http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com/viagra_notes.html viagra notes etc from authentic online Viagra sources. Informative http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com/viagra_articles.html viagra articles published on various places in the cyberspace throw light on the hidden aspects of the medicine and make it adequately clear that why erectile dysfunction patients should proceed to purchase Viagra and how far http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com viagra has been successful in treating male impotence.

  167. Posted August 23, 2007 at 2:14 am | Permalink

    In the ancient era, the http://www.viagraforce.com/influence_of_viagra.html viagra influence was nowhere to be found as the erectile dysfunction medication Viagra didn’t came into being at that time. Specific details on http://www.viagraforce.com/impotence_n_previagra_age.html impotence and pre-viagra age inform us that in that period men relied on Unani, Chinese, Herbal and other medications to treat their erectile dysfunction. But with the arrival of the modern age, Viagra was manufactured and approved by the FDA (Food and Drugs Administration) as an effective treatment of erectile dysfunction and after that the drug emerged extremely successful in treating http://www.viagraforce.com/impotence_in_modernsociety.html impotence in modern society. Other than erectile dysfunction, Viagra has also evolved as an effective medicine to treat pulmonary hypertension and other ailments and this has further increased the popularity of http://www.viagraforce.com/viagra_in_globalsociety.html viagra in global society.

  168. Posted August 31, 2007 at 9:03 am | Permalink

    Top Ten Reasons Why Britney Spears Needs A Zippy Cash Payday Loan

    1. A Zippy Cash payday loan to pay her Nanny while Britney Spears is trying to make a “comeback”.2. A Zippy Cash payday loan to buy a skirt long enough to cover her butt.3. A Zippy Cash payday loan to pay for rehab with Lindsay Lohan4. A Zippy Cash payday loan to buy a wig for the hack job.5. A Zippy Cash payday loan to rent a copy of striptease to find out how it is really done before going back to retake the next bad video.6. A Zippy Cash payday loan to buy a car seat for her baby.7. A Zippy Cash payday loan to pay K-Fed his alimony.8. A Zippy Cash payday loan to pay for her next annulment9. A Zippy Cash payday loan to make the rent payment on her trailer park lease10. A Zippy Cash payday loan to buy a new bottle for Jayden James so she has another one to throw at the paparazzi.

    A payday loan or cash advance is a short term personal loan to help with emergency cash flow needs and pay bills right away to avoid late charges and closed account fees. An online payday loan is available at http://www.zippycash.ca/ or http://www.clickncash.ca/Or http://www.paydaymart.ca

  169. Posted September 18, 2007 at 5:31 pm | Permalink

    Thanks for help, Keep up the good work.

  170. Posted October 17, 2007 at 2:11 am | Permalink

    With regard to http://www.viagracare.com viagra and http://www.viagracare.com/what_is_ed.html erectile dysfunction, it is already apparent that Viagra was first developed as a treatment for angina but later the drug emerged to be a suitable cure for male impotency but far more striking news is presently capturing the attention of the whole world. Seems Untrue! Well, it is doubtlessly true that oysters fed with the anti-impotency drug Viagra has shown effective results against erectile dysfunction and George May, the Australian farmer who created Viagra oysters became thoroughly popular after the news relating to the efficacy of his Viagra oysters leaked out. Guys! If http://www.viagracare.com cheap viagra can make oysters so powerful against erectile dysfunction then why won’t you be able to combat your impotency successfully after you http://www.viagracare.com buy viagra online? Opt for Viagra via http://www.viagracare.com viagra online and once you http://www.viagracare.com buy viagra and administer the drug in accordance with the instructions of the doctor, you would instantly get cured of erectile dysfunction!

  171. Posted October 22, 2007 at 3:24 pm | Permalink

    The “solution” we proposed is further government regulation of the financial institutions that provide payday lending services, usually in the form of caps on the fees that these business firms can charge. Of course, further government intervention is not the answer. Indeed, it is previous government regulation in the consumer finance industry that has, in part, led to the rapid growth of the very payday lending practices so reviled by critics. As always, the law of unintended consequences prevails, leading to outcomes that are directly opposite those sought by government regulators.http://www.paydayland.com http://www.paydayland.com.au

  172. Posted October 24, 2007 at 10:45 pm | Permalink

    This is an age when people are growing more and more health conscious and are becoming more aware about their bodies. The http://www.buy-viagra-with-us.com/resources/health_info_site.html health info sites on the internet are the best guides to these kinds of people.

  173. Posted November 9, 2007 at 6:38 pm | Permalink

    How about limiting the usurious interest rates while you’re at it?

  174. Posted November 9, 2007 at 6:40 pm | Permalink

    A payday loan or cash advance is a short term personal loan to help with emergency cash flow needs and pay bills right away to avoid late charges and closed account fees. An online payday loan is available at http://www.unclepayday.ca

  175. Posted November 9, 2007 at 6:41 pm | Permalink

    A payday loan or cash advance is a short term personal loan to help with emergency cash flow needs and pay bills right away to avoid late charges and closed account fees. An online payday loan is available at http://www.mrpayday.ca

  176. Posted January 16, 2008 at 3:50 am | Permalink

    It’s very good article. Great site with very good look and perfect information.