All three networks carried it, you’d have to dig through their archives or ask.

It was just before oil spiked.

Do you have any links to a reputable US news agency that show Bush on Israeli TV threatening a nuclear strike?

paranoia strikes deep, and you be one paranoid dude, dude.

That has been precisely my point. The amount of ire I’ve drawn is in direct proportion to just how disturbingly close my point strikes those who plan so well. They’ve had a long time to sell whatever is for sale and lack no cunning or willingness to feed their ever so hungry beast. I can’t say I truly understand the gratification of underhandedness, though it seems so compelling for those schemers.

Besides self-admiration it’s almost as though they beg to be stopped. That could be wishful.

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=73909&d=29&m=11&y=2005&pix=opinion.jpg&category=Opinion

http://www.arabnews.com/?page=7&section=0&article=73934&d=29&m=11&y=2005

1.Spend and kill2.Spend and kill3.Spend and kill4.Spend and kill

5.Then,Get on channel 3 in Israel and threaten a nuclear strike on the world’s crude oil delivery system.

Then, just rack-back and watch Crude spike to 70 dollars and gasoline to 3 dollars, which in turn shuts-down SUV sales overnight.

Dealers are stuck, and GM lays off thousands of workers.

President Alfred E. Newman, hard at work.

Do I detect a litle sarcasm??

I agree with you for the most part.Management seems to be severely lacking at most hospitals. You’re not a “Manager,” You’re a Tool of the administration. Their only goal, is to make a profit, regardless of how many nurses they run off.

Clinton: Inherited a strong economy. Hence, income up, tax receipts up, no wars. He almost blew it during his second term, but the Republicans took control of congress and we had record surpluses.

Bush: Took over at the start of a recession (Clinton’s? If recessions are produced by current presidents.)

GDP is about the same as it was during Clinton’s watch. Income is up. Inflation is lower. Unemployment is about the same.

The budget deficet is caused by stupid wars and massive natural disasters. Without 9/11, the budget would be in a reasonable range. There would have been no need ( as Congress saw it) to invade Afganistan or Iraq.

Winner? On economics alone, Bush. On everything else, Clinton.

What five things did President Clinton do that was responsible for the ‘good’ economy?

What five things have President G.W. Bush done that is responsible for the current economy?

In other words, what exactly do you think presidents do that dictates the economy?

If you think that you can just graduate from college at 21yrs old go into the workplace and just do the same thing for the rest of your life then yes you will find yourself in the exact same place as this woman.

Want proof that this is the prevailing mentality? just look at the fact that there is more emphasis by employees on employers paying for helath insurance than paying for tuition and books for education

It’s easy to say that worker was just greedy and should be willing to work for so much less.

What about the same companies that give their CEO’s millions of dollars in bonuses? How many people would that have kept on the payroll?

But hey, the CEO worked hard, the only thing the employee did was do the work that created the profits that paid his bonus. Why not replace them with someone who will do the work for less. After all, don’t you think next quarters bonus should be just a little more.