Oh ANON? If my posts under a long ago nic were mistakenly repeated, and if you do tend to regard my posts as “2x 0 still equals 0″ then do skip over my posts at your convenience.

Oh ANON? Don’t lump XXX or CF or Galahad or Snidely or me into the realm of Hank/nathan or GailahmedIan or any other multi nic posters unless and until you can back it up.

You are irrelevant.

In your little world, setting in front of your webtv system, all you have to do is wait for a commercial break and then post something on the BLOG real quick before your cartoons come back on.

You never have to actually read the innane BLOGs by the WE editors, because you never respond to the point they are trying to make. You just come on and do a little ignorant character assassination.

Well, I’m going to help you out a little. You obviously don’t realize how stupid Rhonda actually is. She finished her BLOG by writing,

“Sounds like Roberts doesn’t need hearings to help him form an opinion of Wilson.”

I believe this is the point she was really trying to make. However, in her opening statement you will see that the purpose of the hearings have nothing to do with ‘forming an opinion on Wilson’. She wrote,

“Sen. Pat Roberts, R-Kan., chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, recently told The Johnson County Sun that he still hopes to hold hearings related to the Valerie Plame case and the issue of cover of all CIA agents and analysts.”

To further demonstrate how incredibly stupid Rhonda seems to be, nothing in the body of her BLOG really has anything to do with the title of her BLOG. This seems to be the general theme of all of the WE headlines though.

Now I know that it is more fun to just mindlessly use this BLOG to make ad hominum attacks on anyone that dissagrees with Opra or Dr Phil, but please, every now and then, try to focus on the point of the BLOG.

We’re pulling for ya, we know you can do it!

Hank

JR used to have other names, but his double postings gave him away. In his case, though, nobody cared, since two times zero is still zero.

Or maybe I don’t.

Hankathan is not one nut but two?

Others knew this but stayed silent?

Now what I miss is that the posts used to have times attached to them. What alerted me that hank was nathan was that their posts always occurred quite close in time to one another.I think there may be more here. Would an elderly VFW Hank use words like “dweeb” and “nimrod”? as he has in just the last few posts?In any case, hank? nothing you say here will ever again be respected. The same can be said for your alter ego or son or whoever.

Ahhhhh the right……..the truth is what they say it is. No previous version of the truth can ever be acknowledged let alone understood. hank is nathan is hanks son. It’s all justified! It’s our fault we missed the details! There was no deception, just disguised details.

That’s the right…….and the war, in a nutshell; emphasis on nut.

However, its never been a secret. Many people on this BLOG know both Nathan and me.

When I’m out of town Nathan usually stays at our house and takes care of the horses and the dogs we leave behind. This last weekend he posted on the BLOG using my computer and I didn’t notice that he changed the name and email address before I posted.

Our relationship has never been a secret. Nathan is a Marine. He is my son. He did four years active and is now using his GI bill to go to school. After 911 he volunteered for the reserves for 4 years. Recently he signed up for 4 another 4 years I think.

I’m still not sure what the fuss is about. I think since you liberal nitwits can’t concentrate on a subject long enough to come up with a cogent thought you just resort to character assasination.

Sincerely,

Hank

PS Thanks for saving my bacon any way!

Hank, you’re Nathan’s father. I read these blogs long before I started posting. An exchange between the Hammer and Damoon stuck in my mind. Hammer aparently looked up “Nathaniel Price” on the sex offender’s list. There is a Nathaniel Price listed, and Hammer posted that. Damoon imeadiately jumped to Nathan’s defense. That indicated to me that Nathan’s last name probably was Price, or Damoon wouldn’t have reacted that way. Obviously the charge hit close to home.

You furnished the last part of the puzzle yourself a while back when you said your son in college was in the Marine reserves.

No need to thank me for saving your bacon (and your credibility)…honesty is it’s own reward.

Your secret is out.

Answer the question! What is the lie I have told? What is the secret?

Sincerely,

Hank

What is the secret? What is the relationship between Nathan and me? If you know, then you know I’m not a liar!

Hank

What a nimrod.

What exactly do you think is the relationship between Nathan and me? What is the logical conclusion your so-called proof leads you to?

Hank

PS I did a GOOGLE search on your name, didn’t find anything out about you, but I did find a picture of your mother.

Except when you’re posing as nathan, liar.

Go read the post above:

Dear XXX,

Did the second link work? I did apologize and explain. I don’t think you have a type.

Still love ya,

Hank

Then check the byline.

There’s my proof, fraud.

Hank

You are getting stranger and stranger! You post under XXX and you dare to question me? Are you serious, you little dweeb?

I sign all of my posts with my name. I’m in the phone book. And you bravely use XXX? Are you so ashamed of you posts that you can’t use your name? Or, like so many other of the brave liberal warriors on these BLOGs, are you just a coward?

Still love ya, but you are straining our reltionship.

Hank

“It’s a strange and paranoid little world you and your hateful friends on this BLOG seem to live in! ”

And it’s a dishonest and untruthful world you live in, Hank/Nathan/Whoever. We all remember how you self-righteously declared how you only posted under your own name. Oh you were so brave! So which name is really yours?

Fraud!

It’s a strange and paranoid little world you and your hateful friends on this BLOG seem to live in! Yes, I’ll have to agree that the American Thinker is a little to the right. Any factual commentary on the news of the day that has little or no political agenda will always be a little to the right of your strange perverted view of the world.

You wrote,

“Obviously one of the over the edge wingnut sites, but I followed some of the links from that site, and it’s no wonder conservatives are so deviated. You should see what they’re reading.”I thought I might give a few examples of the so-called ‘wingnut’ sites:

This site is one from GlobalSecurity.org. It reports and summarizes the news of the day and has no real political agenda.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/library/report/2004/isg-final-report/isg-final-report_vol1_rfp-07.htm

Then there is the link to SSCI, where you can see the bi-partisan intelligence reports on WMD. These reports had to be watered down a little to get the democrats on the committee to swallow them, but still the info on WMDs is still there. (And avoided like the plague by the mainstream media)

http://intelligence.senate.gov/

Then of course there is the UK version of the same thing, more evidence of Saddam’s WMD programs.

http://www.butlerreview.org.uk/index.asp

Don’t go to any of these links if you are scared of the truth! The question is, what did Saddam do with his weapons of mass destruction? The truth is, we found many of them and they were in Iraq under the supervision of the UN!

Hank

(Bush didn’t lie….we just misunderestimated him, LOL)

Way to pick up on the little details XXX!! Every single regular poster on these blogs needs to see this.

I gotta stay relevant to the thread for just a paragraph.

This CONCLUSIVELY demonstrates the lies and the liars who tell them (kudos Al Franken) are often furtheredby the lies and the liars who repeat them. In the case of this blog, it created some arguement. In the case of bush, it made a war.

That said back to “victory at WE.”

I long suspected the nathan hank connection. I think I even speculated on it once.

But this one is all yours XXX. Congrats!!!!

Now I suspect hank the “VFW sub vet” and nathan the “marine” with many posts but no duty post will dissapear. That is those “nics” will disappear. Right now Hankathan is crawling under a rock figuring out what to do or whosheit will be next. Maybe hankathan should consult with gail on the creative use of many names!

Well done XXX