<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The heat&#8217;s still on Rove</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/</link>
	<description>The Wichita Eagle Editorial Department Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:57:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Heckler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Heckler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 16:19:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>Novak&#039;s column motivated me to dig up the oldest PlameGate Weblog I could find. Reading some of this hysterical ranting is kind of funny. Enjoy!

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15988&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15988&lt;/a&gt;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Novak&#8217;s column motivated me to dig up the oldest PlameGate Weblog I could find. Reading some of this hysterical ranting is kind of funny. Enjoy!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15988" rel="nofollow">http://www.humaneventsonline.com/article.php?id=15988</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bisoni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2698</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bisoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2698</guid>
		<description>Wrong again CF.  But you&#039;re always playing it fast and loose with the facts.  The Democrat Party, the great champion of women&#039;s rights who would  have painted Monica Lewinsky as a deranged stalker until that doggone blue dress showed up.

Resolution Impeaching William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.Resolved, That William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:

Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wrong again CF.  But you&#8217;re always playing it fast and loose with the facts.  The Democrat Party, the great champion of women&#8217;s rights who would  have painted Monica Lewinsky as a deranged stalker until that doggone blue dress showed up.</p>
<p>Resolution Impeaching William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors.Resolved, That William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States, is impeached for high crimes and misdemeanors and that the following articles of impeachment be exhibited to the United States Senate:</p>
<p>Articles of impeachment exhibited by the House of Representatives of the United States of America in the name of itself and of the people of the United States of America, against William Jefferson Clinton, President of the United States of America, in maintenance and support of its impeachment against him for high crimes and misdemeanors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2697</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2697</guid>
		<description>Antares, sadly, I don&#039;t believe that was one of my posts that the Eagle printed yesterday.  Yet again, immortality eludes me.

Now for some surgery.

Hank,

If you&#039;re going to whore yourself out to defend a closeted homosexual political strategist who leaked the identity of a covert operative, get the man&#039;s name right: it&#039;s Rove, not Rowe.

Since when is the media a part of the government able to appoint a Special Prosector? Look on Wikipedia for documentation that the CIA made a criminal referral to Justice.  Methinks someone has a bit of egg on his face, Hank.

&#039;DC press corpse&#039; was deliberate, Hank.  I detest them and their sucking up to Bushco--particularly Judy Miller.  They&#039;ve whored themselves out to the Bush Administration and its dishonest, disingenuous Iraq War sales job, although they&#039;ve begun to show signs of remembering how to act like an independent media.

Jimmy, not being able to keep one&#039;s promises and lying are two different things.  I know it&#039;s hard to see the difference when it&#039;s someone you despise as much as Clinton, but do try to keep the distinction in mind.

And frankly, I recall a Republican House and Senate that dismissed his pursuit of al Qaeda as an attempt to change the subject from the Ken Starr Whitewater fiasco.  If Republicans kept him from being able to do his job, they bear an equal burden of responsibility.  Not that they&#039;ll ever accept it; after all, Clinton = Satan and Bush = Jesus.

Finally, we have Kathy ineptly playing the race card.  Hey, Kathy, um, 1965 was a while ago now.  In case you haven&#039;t noticed, all those Democratic Party racists like Strom and Jesse went Republican a long, long, long time ago.  More to the point, Republicans like George Bush II continue to run winning campaigns on anti-Black racism, like the South Carolina primary, where it was whispered that John McCain liked himself a little Brown Sugar and wound up with a mixed race child.

You Republicans are the racists.  That&#039;s the record.  Deal with it.

And if the point is that Democrats love a good lynching while Repubicans don&#039;t, well, ask yourself: who spent $70 million to investigate a crime that was never committed, and then tried to impeach a President for getting a blow job?

I thought so.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antares, sadly, I don&#8217;t believe that was one of my posts that the Eagle printed yesterday.  Yet again, immortality eludes me.</p>
<p>Now for some surgery.</p>
<p>Hank,</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re going to whore yourself out to defend a closeted homosexual political strategist who leaked the identity of a covert operative, get the man&#8217;s name right: it&#8217;s Rove, not Rowe.</p>
<p>Since when is the media a part of the government able to appoint a Special Prosector? Look on Wikipedia for documentation that the CIA made a criminal referral to Justice.  Methinks someone has a bit of egg on his face, Hank.</p>
<p>&#8216;DC press corpse&#8217; was deliberate, Hank.  I detest them and their sucking up to Bushco&#8211;particularly Judy Miller.  They&#8217;ve whored themselves out to the Bush Administration and its dishonest, disingenuous Iraq War sales job, although they&#8217;ve begun to show signs of remembering how to act like an independent media.</p>
<p>Jimmy, not being able to keep one&#8217;s promises and lying are two different things.  I know it&#8217;s hard to see the difference when it&#8217;s someone you despise as much as Clinton, but do try to keep the distinction in mind.</p>
<p>And frankly, I recall a Republican House and Senate that dismissed his pursuit of al Qaeda as an attempt to change the subject from the Ken Starr Whitewater fiasco.  If Republicans kept him from being able to do his job, they bear an equal burden of responsibility.  Not that they&#8217;ll ever accept it; after all, Clinton = Satan and Bush = Jesus.</p>
<p>Finally, we have Kathy ineptly playing the race card.  Hey, Kathy, um, 1965 was a while ago now.  In case you haven&#8217;t noticed, all those Democratic Party racists like Strom and Jesse went Republican a long, long, long time ago.  More to the point, Republicans like George Bush II continue to run winning campaigns on anti-Black racism, like the South Carolina primary, where it was whispered that John McCain liked himself a little Brown Sugar and wound up with a mixed race child.</p>
<p>You Republicans are the racists.  That&#8217;s the record.  Deal with it.</p>
<p>And if the point is that Democrats love a good lynching while Repubicans don&#8217;t, well, ask yourself: who spent $70 million to investigate a crime that was never committed, and then tried to impeach a President for getting a blow job?</p>
<p>I thought so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>My, that&#039;s interesting. There seems to be 2 of me. Do I have an evil twin out there? Is there someone who&#039;s so unsure of their position that they need to steal a name to state said position? What a shame.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My, that&#8217;s interesting. There seems to be 2 of me. Do I have an evil twin out there? Is there someone who&#8217;s so unsure of their position that they need to steal a name to state said position? What a shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hammer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2695</link>
		<dc:creator>Hammer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2695</guid>
		<description>Hank, you&#039;re probably right. I expect the administration will figure out a way to &quot;make it go away&quot;, but not for a while. It&#039;ll be another festering wound to Chimpy. We&#039;ve slowed down or stopped his domestic agenda, and his Private accounts are dead in the water. He&#039;s not just a lame duck, he&#039;s a dead duck. Yes, he&#039;s going to get to pick a Supreme court justice or 2, but I think you wingnuts are in for a surprise. You see, you neocons don&#039;t own Chimpy; big business does, and business doesn&#039;t want a social ideologue, they want someone who&#039;s pro-business. Chimpy won&#039;t be able to start anymore wars, the war he&#039;s already got has turned a lot of Americans against him. Stick a fork in him...he&#039;s done, a has-been. Nothing is going to happen in congress because we&#039;re getting too close to the 2006 election, and after that, a dozen republicans will derail Monkey-Boy to prove they&#039;re presidential material, and not Bush&#039;s lackey. So rant on...you folks are done for the next 3 years at least.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank, you&#8217;re probably right. I expect the administration will figure out a way to &#8220;make it go away&#8221;, but not for a while. It&#8217;ll be another festering wound to Chimpy. We&#8217;ve slowed down or stopped his domestic agenda, and his Private accounts are dead in the water. He&#8217;s not just a lame duck, he&#8217;s a dead duck. Yes, he&#8217;s going to get to pick a Supreme court justice or 2, but I think you wingnuts are in for a surprise. You see, you neocons don&#8217;t own Chimpy; big business does, and business doesn&#8217;t want a social ideologue, they want someone who&#8217;s pro-business. Chimpy won&#8217;t be able to start anymore wars, the war he&#8217;s already got has turned a lot of Americans against him. Stick a fork in him&#8230;he&#8217;s done, a has-been. Nothing is going to happen in congress because we&#8217;re getting too close to the 2006 election, and after that, a dozen republicans will derail Monkey-Boy to prove they&#8217;re presidential material, and not Bush&#8217;s lackey. So rant on&#8230;you folks are done for the next 3 years at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2694</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2694</guid>
		<description>Gentle people,

This will all go away, because there is nothing to it.

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentle people,</p>
<p>This will all go away, because there is nothing to it.</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Twister</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Twister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>Jimmy--Take a breath.  It was 3000 that died in the 9-11 attacks, not 7000.

Did you ever wonder why Al Qaeda started &quot;hating us for our freedoms&quot; in 1993?Why didn&#039;t they hate us in 1990 or wait until 1995?

In 1991, George H.W. Bush put American (i.e., non-Muslim) troops in Saudi Arabia, the &quot;land of the two holy sites&quot; to true believers, the land that should never be defiled let alone OCCUPIED by foreigners.

Lying Sec&#039;y of Defense and POS Dick Cheney said that those troops would be in Arabia &quot;not one minute longer than they needed to be.&quot;

Ten years later, they were still there.  And during those ten years, Arab militants attacked the US in Somalia, the Suden, Arabia, Yemen, Kenya, and the twin towers twice.

Terrorism against the US is a direct result of our own stupidity in stationing troops in Arabia.  I blame Bush I, Bush II, AND Clinton.

Of course, this doesn&#039;t justify terrorism, but had we not been there, they would not have tried to kill us for a decade.

Instead of a reasonable response against terrorism, we&#039;re fighting on two fronts and killing a lot of people, including our own soldiers.

If that&#039;s progress to you, then I don&#039;t know how much more &quot;progress&quot; we can stand.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy&#8211;Take a breath.  It was 3000 that died in the 9-11 attacks, not 7000.</p>
<p>Did you ever wonder why Al Qaeda started &#8220;hating us for our freedoms&#8221; in 1993?Why didn&#8217;t they hate us in 1990 or wait until 1995?</p>
<p>In 1991, George H.W. Bush put American (i.e., non-Muslim) troops in Saudi Arabia, the &#8220;land of the two holy sites&#8221; to true believers, the land that should never be defiled let alone OCCUPIED by foreigners.</p>
<p>Lying Sec&#8217;y of Defense and POS Dick Cheney said that those troops would be in Arabia &#8220;not one minute longer than they needed to be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ten years later, they were still there.  And during those ten years, Arab militants attacked the US in Somalia, the Suden, Arabia, Yemen, Kenya, and the twin towers twice.</p>
<p>Terrorism against the US is a direct result of our own stupidity in stationing troops in Arabia.  I blame Bush I, Bush II, AND Clinton.</p>
<p>Of course, this doesn&#8217;t justify terrorism, but had we not been there, they would not have tried to kill us for a decade.</p>
<p>Instead of a reasonable response against terrorism, we&#8217;re fighting on two fronts and killing a lot of people, including our own soldiers.</p>
<p>If that&#8217;s progress to you, then I don&#8217;t know how much more &#8220;progress&#8221; we can stand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2692</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 21:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2692</guid>
		<description>Bagit, I know where my ungabunga manhood is.

Please don&#039;t bite down
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bagit, I know where my ungabunga manhood is.</p>
<p>Please don&#8217;t bite down</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bisoni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bisoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>You libs want to talk about some lies with real consequences?  Doubt it.Some things the US citizens should never forget:

After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.

Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people in New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You libs want to talk about some lies with real consequences?  Doubt it.Some things the US citizens should never forget:</p>
<p>After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.</p>
<p>After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.</p>
<p>After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed 19 and injured 200 U.S. military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.</p>
<p>After the 1998 bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.</p>
<p>After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 U.S. sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished.</p>
<p>Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 7,000 people in New York and Washington, D.C. that are now dead would be alive today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagit</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>Dagett, it is so pathetic to see you still looking for your ungabunga manhood.  I&#039;d laugh at you or feel sorry for you, but you&#039;re too pathetic for that. Mommy Dean probably has another all-year sucker for you so you won&#039;t ever have to grow up, you poor, dear little boy.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dagett, it is so pathetic to see you still looking for your ungabunga manhood.  I&#8217;d laugh at you or feel sorry for you, but you&#8217;re too pathetic for that. Mommy Dean probably has another all-year sucker for you so you won&#8217;t ever have to grow up, you poor, dear little boy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 20:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2689</guid>
		<description>Spin it any way you want to, Repubs. Seems the American people don&#039;t see it your way.

&quot;Just a quarter of Americans think the White House is fully cooperating in the federal investigation of the leak of a CIA operative&#039;s identity, a number that&#039;s declined sharply since the investigation began. And three-quarters say that if presidential adviser Karl Rove was responsible for leaking classified information, it should cost him his job.

Skepticism about the administration&#039;s cooperation has jumped. As the initial investigation began in September 2003, nearly half the public, 47 percent, believed the White House was fully cooperating. That fell to 39 percent a few weeks later, and it&#039;s lower still, 25 percent, in this new ABC News poll.&quot;

I know. When the polls don&#039;t favor you, they don&#039;t count. But it looks to me like a lot of Americans are starting to realize what a bunch of creeps we have in the whitehouse.

President Chimpy&#039;s boy Rove may be in trouble.

By the way Hank, do you check out anything besides Faux News? &quot;DC press Corpse&quot; is a term that&#039;s been in use for a few weeks now. Wake up, sonny.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spin it any way you want to, Repubs. Seems the American people don&#8217;t see it your way.</p>
<p>&#8220;Just a quarter of Americans think the White House is fully cooperating in the federal investigation of the leak of a CIA operative&#8217;s identity, a number that&#8217;s declined sharply since the investigation began. And three-quarters say that if presidential adviser Karl Rove was responsible for leaking classified information, it should cost him his job.</p>
<p>Skepticism about the administration&#8217;s cooperation has jumped. As the initial investigation began in September 2003, nearly half the public, 47 percent, believed the White House was fully cooperating. That fell to 39 percent a few weeks later, and it&#8217;s lower still, 25 percent, in this new ABC News poll.&#8221;</p>
<p>I know. When the polls don&#8217;t favor you, they don&#8217;t count. But it looks to me like a lot of Americans are starting to realize what a bunch of creeps we have in the whitehouse.</p>
<p>President Chimpy&#8217;s boy Rove may be in trouble.</p>
<p>By the way Hank, do you check out anything besides Faux News? &#8220;DC press Corpse&#8221; is a term that&#8217;s been in use for a few weeks now. Wake up, sonny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2688</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2688</guid>
		<description>Dear CF,

Actually it has been getting less and less ugly as time goes by and more and more facts come out.

At first it was Rowe outed a CIA covert agent, he committed a crime!  Then it was well;  Rowe didn&#039;t commit a crime, but what he did was unethical.  Now its well but he signed a SF-312 and look what that form says!  Of course there&#039;s no evidence that he disclosed or confirmed any classified information.

By next week Bush will have nominated his selection for the Supreme Court and the democrats and MSM will be busy pouring over video rental records to see if the selection is qualified.  They will forget about Karl Rowe quicker that they forgot about Tom Delay after they found out more democrats were guilty of finance errors than Tom.

&quot;DC press corpse&quot; is that not a perfect example of a &quot;Freudian slip or what?&quot;

I remain,

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear CF,</p>
<p>Actually it has been getting less and less ugly as time goes by and more and more facts come out.</p>
<p>At first it was Rowe outed a CIA covert agent, he committed a crime!  Then it was well;  Rowe didn&#8217;t commit a crime, but what he did was unethical.  Now its well but he signed a SF-312 and look what that form says!  Of course there&#8217;s no evidence that he disclosed or confirmed any classified information.</p>
<p>By next week Bush will have nominated his selection for the Supreme Court and the democrats and MSM will be busy pouring over video rental records to see if the selection is qualified.  They will forget about Karl Rowe quicker that they forgot about Tom Delay after they found out more democrats were guilty of finance errors than Tom.</p>
<p>&#8220;DC press corpse&#8221; is that not a perfect example of a &#8220;Freudian slip or what?&#8221;</p>
<p>I remain,</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bisoni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2687</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bisoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:23:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2687</guid>
		<description>Hey Libs:  Q-In two years how many times did Bill Clinton meet one on one with his CIA Director?A- 0Stop crying your crocodile tears about the CIA.  This is all about &quot;getting&quot; Rove.  Just try to be honest.  For once.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Libs:  Q-In two years how many times did Bill Clinton meet one on one with his CIA Director?A- 0Stop crying your crocodile tears about the CIA.  This is all about &#8220;getting&#8221; Rove.  Just try to be honest.  For once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2686</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2686</guid>
		<description>Dear Dagett,

Yes, my friend, I realize that yes means affirmative.  When, did an official spokesman for the CIA say that Plame was undercover?  The facts indicate the last time she was a covert agent was in 1997.  The facts indicate that it was common knowledge that she worked for the CIA as a paper pusher since then.

You asked?

&quot;Why do you think the CIA went to the Justice Department?&quot;

I&#039;ve seen no evidence that this was initiated by the CIA.  The MSM demanded a special proscuter first in the hope they could get Novak.  The CIA probably went to justice to get the MSM off their back.

I too hope that this goes on and on, every day the media and the democrats look sillier and sillier!

Fondly,

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dagett,</p>
<p>Yes, my friend, I realize that yes means affirmative.  When, did an official spokesman for the CIA say that Plame was undercover?  The facts indicate the last time she was a covert agent was in 1997.  The facts indicate that it was common knowledge that she worked for the CIA as a paper pusher since then.</p>
<p>You asked?</p>
<p>&#8220;Why do you think the CIA went to the Justice Department?&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen no evidence that this was initiated by the CIA.  The MSM demanded a special proscuter first in the hope they could get Novak.  The CIA probably went to justice to get the MSM off their back.</p>
<p>I too hope that this goes on and on, every day the media and the democrats look sillier and sillier!</p>
<p>Fondly,</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:10:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>Traditionally, isn&#039;t the Democratic party the anti-Lincoln party, the slavery party, the party known for all the hatemongering and black lynchings, the party that had to be shamed by Republicans into passing civil rights legislation because Republicans supported them by a higher margin than Democrats? Well, yes, that&#039;s them all right.

They haven&#039;t had a good political lynching since Nixon or Bork, by damn. Looks like they&#039;re awfully hungry.

Also looks like nothing has changed with the Democrat Party&#039;s hate mongering.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Traditionally, isn&#8217;t the Democratic party the anti-Lincoln party, the slavery party, the party known for all the hatemongering and black lynchings, the party that had to be shamed by Republicans into passing civil rights legislation because Republicans supported them by a higher margin than Democrats? Well, yes, that&#8217;s them all right.</p>
<p>They haven&#8217;t had a good political lynching since Nixon or Bork, by damn. Looks like they&#8217;re awfully hungry.</p>
<p>Also looks like nothing has changed with the Democrat Party&#8217;s hate mongering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 18:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>Hank,

Ah, purebreds: the joy that only inbreeding can bring.  If I were you, I&#039;d also be turning to my non-political sources of comfort and satisfaction, given the fact that the DC press corpse seems to have finally woken up to the scandals waiting to be reported concerning the Bush administration.

Jimmy,

Freudian slip or what? When you ask whether Rove has been indicted &#039;yet&#039;, this suggests that you think he will.  You might want to make use of that &#039;Preview&#039; button down below before you dig yourself in any deeper.

This whole thing is only beginning to get as ugly as it eventually will.  Much, much more is coming down the pike.  And we&#039;re HOW far into Bush&#039;s second term?

Fellow Moonbats, and all you Wingnuts, stay tuned!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank,</p>
<p>Ah, purebreds: the joy that only inbreeding can bring.  If I were you, I&#8217;d also be turning to my non-political sources of comfort and satisfaction, given the fact that the DC press corpse seems to have finally woken up to the scandals waiting to be reported concerning the Bush administration.</p>
<p>Jimmy,</p>
<p>Freudian slip or what? When you ask whether Rove has been indicted &#8216;yet&#8217;, this suggests that you think he will.  You might want to make use of that &#8216;Preview&#8217; button down below before you dig yourself in any deeper.</p>
<p>This whole thing is only beginning to get as ugly as it eventually will.  Much, much more is coming down the pike.  And we&#8217;re HOW far into Bush&#8217;s second term?</p>
<p>Fellow Moonbats, and all you Wingnuts, stay tuned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bisoni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bisoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 17:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>Has Karl Rove been indicted yet?  Didn&#039;t think so :-)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has Karl Rove been indicted yet?  Didn&#8217;t think so :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re dreaming, Hank. So I&#039;ll quote it one more time:

Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson&#039;s wife worked at the CIA and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes.

Hank, the word &quot;YES&quot; means &quot;AFFIRMATIVE&quot;. Cooper said he learned that Wilson&#039;s wife worked for the CIA from Rove.

&quot;Did Rove say that she worked at the &quot;agency&quot; on &quot;WMD&quot;? Yes.&quot;

Again Hank, in the affirmative. Whether you think so or not, the CIA says Plame was undercover. I think the CIA probably is more knowledgable than you are. Good God man, I apparently have houseplants that are more knowledgable that you are.Why do you think the CIA went to the Justice Department?

Hank, I suggest you look up SF-312, also known as Classified Non Disclosure Agreement. It&#039;s pretty specific about what information can and can&#039;t be disclosed. Rove signed the agreement and he violated it (not that a lying, unethical republican is anything new). Here&#039;s a link that might help; read the part about &quot;Confirming Classified Information:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050715140232-17725.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050715140232-17725.pdf&lt;/a&gt;

I don&#039;t think for a minute Rove will be indicted for anything, and I don&#039;t want him to be. I want him in the Whitehouse as a glaring example of the perfidity and lack of ethics in this administration.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re dreaming, Hank. So I&#8217;ll quote it one more time:</p>
<p>Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson&#8217;s wife worked at the CIA and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes.</p>
<p>Hank, the word &#8220;YES&#8221; means &#8220;AFFIRMATIVE&#8221;. Cooper said he learned that Wilson&#8217;s wife worked for the CIA from Rove.</p>
<p>&#8220;Did Rove say that she worked at the &#8220;agency&#8221; on &#8220;WMD&#8221;? Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Again Hank, in the affirmative. Whether you think so or not, the CIA says Plame was undercover. I think the CIA probably is more knowledgable than you are. Good God man, I apparently have houseplants that are more knowledgable that you are.Why do you think the CIA went to the Justice Department?</p>
<p>Hank, I suggest you look up SF-312, also known as Classified Non Disclosure Agreement. It&#8217;s pretty specific about what information can and can&#8217;t be disclosed. Rove signed the agreement and he violated it (not that a lying, unethical republican is anything new). Here&#8217;s a link that might help; read the part about &#8220;Confirming Classified Information:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050715140232-17725.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.democrats.reform.house.gov/Documents/20050715140232-17725.pdf</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think for a minute Rove will be indicted for anything, and I don&#8217;t want him to be. I want him in the Whitehouse as a glaring example of the perfidity and lack of ethics in this administration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>Dear CF,

You finally got something right!  I am smug!  I am self-satisfied!  (I don&#039;t think I&#039;m delusional, but how would I know?)  Being delusional is kinda like being humble, if you think you are, you&#039;re not.

Why am I smug?  Because I have the #1 bearded collie in his herding class.  Why am I self-satisfied?  Because that is one of the traits of a conservative.  We do not depend on others for our happiness.

Sincerely,

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear CF,</p>
<p>You finally got something right!  I am smug!  I am self-satisfied!  (I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;m delusional, but how would I know?)  Being delusional is kinda like being humble, if you think you are, you&#8217;re not.</p>
<p>Why am I smug?  Because I have the #1 bearded collie in his herding class.  Why am I self-satisfied?  Because that is one of the traits of a conservative.  We do not depend on others for our happiness.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>Dear Dagett,

I actually feel a little sorry for Matt Cooper.  I saw him interviewed a couple of times yesterday.  He seems confused and uncomfortable with the leading questions that he was being asked.

Instead of asking him questions that could shed a little light on the situation, he was asked questions that seem to reinforce the preconcieved notion that Rove is guilty of something.

Here is a little fact from all of Matt Cooper&#039;s interviews.  Nothing he said indicates that Rove is guilty of anything.  Nothing he said indicates that Rove did anything unethical.

In fact, if you take the intire content of what Matt Cooper has to say, it seems to exonerate Karl Rove.

Sorry,

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Dagett,</p>
<p>I actually feel a little sorry for Matt Cooper.  I saw him interviewed a couple of times yesterday.  He seems confused and uncomfortable with the leading questions that he was being asked.</p>
<p>Instead of asking him questions that could shed a little light on the situation, he was asked questions that seem to reinforce the preconcieved notion that Rove is guilty of something.</p>
<p>Here is a little fact from all of Matt Cooper&#8217;s interviews.  Nothing he said indicates that Rove is guilty of anything.  Nothing he said indicates that Rove did anything unethical.</p>
<p>In fact, if you take the intire content of what Matt Cooper has to say, it seems to exonerate Karl Rove.</p>
<p>Sorry,</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CF</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>CF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 16:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>Antares,

Man, are you sh****n&#039; me?!? Damn.  I usually buy the Sunday edition, but I didn&#039;t yesterday.  Guess I&#039;ll have to poke around Wichita and see if there&#039;s a copy somewheres.

Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy...

Here&#039;s some commentary for Jimmy, for whom no three day-old GOP spin is so putrid that he can&#039;t attempt to recycle it.  My comments are in all caps.  Jimmy wrote:

Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper&#039;s now famous e-mail exchange with Karl Rove, President Bush&#039;s top political strategist, shows that Cooper initiated the contact with Rove, not the other way around [HOW IS THIS RELEVANT, JIMMY?], and that Rove did not reveal Plame&#039;s name [IF SOMEBODY SAYS &#039;MRS. JIMMY BISONI,&#039; THAT&#039;S A PRETTY GOOD WAY OF INDICATING A PERSON&#039;S IDENTITY, WOULDN&#039;T YOU SAY, JIMMY?].  The New York Times reported on Friday that, contrary to Wilson&#039;s spin, Rove did not contact columnist Bob Novak to divulge Plame&#039;s name. Novak called Rove, and it was Novak who told Rove that Plame recommended her husband for the Niger trip. Rove simply responded that he&#039;d heard the same thing.

This is important because Wilson claimed to have been sent to Niger by Vice President Dick Cheney, and that his wife had nothing to do with his selection. Both claims were later proven untrue. [UM, NO, AS OF TODAY THAT&#039;S STILL A MATTER OF DISPUTE, AND I&#039;VE SEEN AUTHORITATIVE REPORTS CLAIMING THAT CHENEY&#039;S OFFICE WAS PART OF THE INITIATIVE THAT SENT WILSON TO NIGER]

The icing on the cake was Wilson&#039;s own admission, made Thursday, that &quot;My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.&quot; [HERE YOU&#039;RE BEING DELIBERATELY OBTUSE, JIMMY.  I&#039;LL REORGANIZE THE SENTENCE TO HELP YOUR LIMITED INTELLECT GRASP THE SEMANTIC IMPLICATIONS OF WILSON&#039;S STATEMENT: &#039;THE DAY THAT BOB NOVAK BLEW HER IDENTITY, MY WIFE WAS NOT A CLANDESTINE OFFICER.&#039;  THE IMPLICATION IS THAT THE MOMENT HER COVER WAS BLOWN BY NOVAK, SHE HAD CEASED TO BE CLANDESTINE.]

So not only was Karl Rove not calling reporters to disclose the identity of Plame, whose name he did not then know, she was not even a covert agent at the time, as has been incessantly claimed. [SHE ABSOLUTELY WAS.  IF SHE WASN&#039;T CLANDESTINE, JIMMY, THEN WHY WOULD THE CIA ASK THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR? ON THIS POINT, YOU GOT LESS THAN NOTHIN&#039;]

That the sources for these revelations were Time magazine, The New York Times and Joe Wilson himself will, of course, have no effect on the wingnuts [HEY JIMMY, I&#039;M ON THE LEFT.  I&#039;M A MOONBAT. I WEAR A TINFOIL HAT SO I CAN HEAR THE SECRET CIA BROADCASTS, REMEMBER?  &#039;WINGNUT&#039; IS THE SHORTENED VERSION OF &#039;RIGHT WING NUTJOBS,&#039; THAT IS, FOLKS LIKE YOURSELF. IF YOU&#039;RE GOING TO CALL ME NAMES, CALL ME THE RIGHT ONES.  SHEESH!] who peddle Karl Rove conspiracy theories.

On the famous person body count, Jimmy is correct thatTeddy Kennedy has killed one person more than has Karl Rove.  That ranks Teddy with First Lady Laura Bush, who also has an automotive body count of 1.  George better nominate a woman for the SCOTUS.  I wouldn&#039;t make her mad.

And with Hank, well, gosh, I can&#039;t help it if you see what you want to see.  I mean, when Matt Cooper says in an interview that Rove and Scooter Libby both revealed Valerie Plame&#039;s identity and Hank says &#039;move along, nothin&#039; to see here,&#039; the smell of Kool-Aid wipes out everything else in the room.  Hank is smug, self-satisfied, and delusional.

Dagett, I&#039;m not sure where this thing is going.  I&#039;m cynical enough to agree with your intuition that Bush will go back on his word to protect Rove, but when commentators like Frank Rich and Dan Schorr say that it&#039;s only a matter of time before the knight falls on his sword to protect the king, I wonder.

The real wild card here is Fitzgerald.  Watch for the Bushes to begin sliming him if he gets too close.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Antares,</p>
<p>Man, are you sh****n&#8217; me?!? Damn.  I usually buy the Sunday edition, but I didn&#8217;t yesterday.  Guess I&#8217;ll have to poke around Wichita and see if there&#8217;s a copy somewheres.</p>
<p>Jimmy, Jimmy, Jimmy&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s some commentary for Jimmy, for whom no three day-old GOP spin is so putrid that he can&#8217;t attempt to recycle it.  My comments are in all caps.  Jimmy wrote:</p>
<p>Time magazine reporter Matt Cooper&#8217;s now famous e-mail exchange with Karl Rove, President Bush&#8217;s top political strategist, shows that Cooper initiated the contact with Rove, not the other way around [HOW IS THIS RELEVANT, JIMMY?], and that Rove did not reveal Plame&#8217;s name [IF SOMEBODY SAYS 'MRS. JIMMY BISONI,' THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD WAY OF INDICATING A PERSON'S IDENTITY, WOULDN'T YOU SAY, JIMMY?].  The New York Times reported on Friday that, contrary to Wilson&#8217;s spin, Rove did not contact columnist Bob Novak to divulge Plame&#8217;s name. Novak called Rove, and it was Novak who told Rove that Plame recommended her husband for the Niger trip. Rove simply responded that he&#8217;d heard the same thing.</p>
<p>This is important because Wilson claimed to have been sent to Niger by Vice President Dick Cheney, and that his wife had nothing to do with his selection. Both claims were later proven untrue. [UM, NO, AS OF TODAY THAT'S STILL A MATTER OF DISPUTE, AND I'VE SEEN AUTHORITATIVE REPORTS CLAIMING THAT CHENEY'S OFFICE WAS PART OF THE INITIATIVE THAT SENT WILSON TO NIGER]</p>
<p>The icing on the cake was Wilson&#8217;s own admission, made Thursday, that &#8220;My wife was not a clandestine officer the day that Bob Novak blew her identity.&#8221; [HERE YOU'RE BEING DELIBERATELY OBTUSE, JIMMY.  I'LL REORGANIZE THE SENTENCE TO HELP YOUR LIMITED INTELLECT GRASP THE SEMANTIC IMPLICATIONS OF WILSON'S STATEMENT: 'THE DAY THAT BOB NOVAK BLEW HER IDENTITY, MY WIFE WAS NOT A CLANDESTINE OFFICER.'  THE IMPLICATION IS THAT THE MOMENT HER COVER WAS BLOWN BY NOVAK, SHE HAD CEASED TO BE CLANDESTINE.]</p>
<p>So not only was Karl Rove not calling reporters to disclose the identity of Plame, whose name he did not then know, she was not even a covert agent at the time, as has been incessantly claimed. [SHE ABSOLUTELY WAS.  IF SHE WASN'T CLANDESTINE, JIMMY, THEN WHY WOULD THE CIA ASK THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT TO APPOINT A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR? ON THIS POINT, YOU GOT LESS THAN NOTHIN']</p>
<p>That the sources for these revelations were Time magazine, The New York Times and Joe Wilson himself will, of course, have no effect on the wingnuts [HEY JIMMY, I'M ON THE LEFT.  I'M A MOONBAT. I WEAR A TINFOIL HAT SO I CAN HEAR THE SECRET CIA BROADCASTS, REMEMBER?  'WINGNUT' IS THE SHORTENED VERSION OF 'RIGHT WING NUTJOBS,' THAT IS, FOLKS LIKE YOURSELF. IF YOU'RE GOING TO CALL ME NAMES, CALL ME THE RIGHT ONES.  SHEESH!] who peddle Karl Rove conspiracy theories.</p>
<p>On the famous person body count, Jimmy is correct thatTeddy Kennedy has killed one person more than has Karl Rove.  That ranks Teddy with First Lady Laura Bush, who also has an automotive body count of 1.  George better nominate a woman for the SCOTUS.  I wouldn&#8217;t make her mad.</p>
<p>And with Hank, well, gosh, I can&#8217;t help it if you see what you want to see.  I mean, when Matt Cooper says in an interview that Rove and Scooter Libby both revealed Valerie Plame&#8217;s identity and Hank says &#8216;move along, nothin&#8217; to see here,&#8217; the smell of Kool-Aid wipes out everything else in the room.  Hank is smug, self-satisfied, and delusional.</p>
<p>Dagett, I&#8217;m not sure where this thing is going.  I&#8217;m cynical enough to agree with your intuition that Bush will go back on his word to protect Rove, but when commentators like Frank Rich and Dan Schorr say that it&#8217;s only a matter of time before the knight falls on his sword to protect the king, I wonder.</p>
<p>The real wild card here is Fitzgerald.  Watch for the Bushes to begin sliming him if he gets too close.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dagett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2678</link>
		<dc:creator>Dagett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 15:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2678</guid>
		<description>Hank, I almost hate to waste facts here, because you seem to ignore them.

Cooper said:

&quot;So did Rove leak Plame&#039;s name to me, or tell me she was covert? No. Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson&#039;s wife worked at the CIA and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes. Did Rove say that she worked at the &quot;agency&quot; on &quot;WMD&quot;? Yes.&quot;

I agree Rove won&#039;t be convicted or fired. The President won&#039;t &quot;fire anybody involved&quot;. Just more proof what a liar Bush is.I think keeping Rove in power is a good thing. He&#039;s the poster child of sleaze, and I like the idea that everybody gets their nose rubbed in it. It&#039;ll keep people &quot;focused&quot;, at least till the next election.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hank, I almost hate to waste facts here, because you seem to ignore them.</p>
<p>Cooper said:</p>
<p>&#8220;So did Rove leak Plame&#8217;s name to me, or tell me she was covert? No. Was it through my conversation with Rove that I learned for the first time that Wilson&#8217;s wife worked at the CIA and may have been responsible for sending him? Yes. Did Rove say that she worked at the &#8220;agency&#8221; on &#8220;WMD&#8221;? Yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree Rove won&#8217;t be convicted or fired. The President won&#8217;t &#8220;fire anybody involved&#8221;. Just more proof what a liar Bush is.I think keeping Rove in power is a good thing. He&#8217;s the poster child of sleaze, and I like the idea that everybody gets their nose rubbed in it. It&#8217;ll keep people &#8220;focused&#8221;, at least till the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hank Price</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2677</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 14:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2677</guid>
		<description>Gentle people,

As we learn more and more about Karl Rove and his supposed crime, the less and less it appears that he did anything wrong.

The recent stories in the news from the various reporters involved seem to vindicate him.  Futhermore, they tend to make the deomcrats and their allies in the MSM look more and more foolish.

The reasons that they are after Karl Rove is simple;  he is very good at what he does and devoid of any positve policies they are left with character assassination as their only political strategy.

Karl Rove will not be fired.  He will not be indicted.  This whole thing will go away.

Fondly,

Hank
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gentle people,</p>
<p>As we learn more and more about Karl Rove and his supposed crime, the less and less it appears that he did anything wrong.</p>
<p>The recent stories in the news from the various reporters involved seem to vindicate him.  Futhermore, they tend to make the deomcrats and their allies in the MSM look more and more foolish.</p>
<p>The reasons that they are after Karl Rove is simple;  he is very good at what he does and devoid of any positve policies they are left with character assassination as their only political strategy.</p>
<p>Karl Rove will not be fired.  He will not be indicted.  This whole thing will go away.</p>
<p>Fondly,</p>
<p>Hank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister Twister</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Twister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 13:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>Jimmy&#039;s post is what I love about the right wing-nuts, no matter what Bush and his people do, it&#039;s good and right.

The man never made a mistake.  He grew gov&#039;t 27 percent in his first three years, he cuts taxes on the rich while fighting two wars, national debt is going up radically after 8 years of Clinton&#039;s paying it down, he was on vacation while the intelligence agencies were running around with &quot;their hair on fire&quot; before 9-11, Dick Cheney chaired a committee on terrorism that NEVER MET, we&#039;re fighting in Iraq against an enemy that never attacked us and posed no threat to us, the Dow Jones stood at 11,000 when Bush took office and almost five years later it stands at 10,500 (so much for privatizing your retirement in the stock market), and the Bush brownshirts still drive around with &quot;W&#039;s&quot; on their cars.

Oh, did I mention oil which our country uses like an addict uses herion thanks to Bush&#039;s &quot;use oil, use oil, use more oil&quot; policy, is at an all-time high?

Worst. President. Ever.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jimmy&#8217;s post is what I love about the right wing-nuts, no matter what Bush and his people do, it&#8217;s good and right.</p>
<p>The man never made a mistake.  He grew gov&#8217;t 27 percent in his first three years, he cuts taxes on the rich while fighting two wars, national debt is going up radically after 8 years of Clinton&#8217;s paying it down, he was on vacation while the intelligence agencies were running around with &#8220;their hair on fire&#8221; before 9-11, Dick Cheney chaired a committee on terrorism that NEVER MET, we&#8217;re fighting in Iraq against an enemy that never attacked us and posed no threat to us, the Dow Jones stood at 11,000 when Bush took office and almost five years later it stands at 10,500 (so much for privatizing your retirement in the stock market), and the Bush brownshirts still drive around with &#8220;W&#8217;s&#8221; on their cars.</p>
<p>Oh, did I mention oil which our country uses like an addict uses herion thanks to Bush&#8217;s &#8220;use oil, use oil, use more oil&#8221; policy, is at an all-time high?</p>
<p>Worst. President. Ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jimmy Bisoni</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1/#comment-2675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy Bisoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 11:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.varsitykansas.com/weblog/2005/07/the_heats_still_1html/#comment-2675</guid>
		<description>Teddy Kennedy has killed more people than Karl Rove and we still have to deal with Teddy.Get over it, Libs.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Teddy Kennedy has killed more people than Karl Rove and we still have to deal with Teddy.Get over it, Libs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
