It can’t be fun to hear rampant speculation about whether you’re going to retire or expire soon, but the notice served by Chief Justice William Rehnquist that he’s staying on the bench as long as his health allows won’t stop the guessing game. Justice Sandra Day O’Connor’s retirement and the advanced age (85) of Justice John Paul Stevens make the future of the court much bigger than Rehnquist’s plans. And with the advise-and-consent process new to 56 senators, including Kansas Sens. Sam Brownback and Pat Roberts, the succession question is only going to generate more buzz.
Posted by Rhonda Holman
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- ANTI on Open thread 11/24
- DavidB on Open thread 11/24
- okobserver on Open thread 11/24
- ANTI on Open thread 11/24
- ANTI on Open thread 11/24
- DavidB on Open thread 11/24
- ANTI on Open thread 11/24
- ANTI on Open thread 11/24
- DavidB on Open thread 11/24
- Chas on Open thread 11/24

2 Comments
the next appointment to SCOTUS will be be the fight of this administration I fear. Both sides are amped on this one and I’m not sure there will be a way to find middle ground without upsetting the respective bases (and the money that comes from them).
There should be a mandatory retirement age for Supreme’s of 70. Anything older and you chance failing health, or worse, “oldtimers”. Diminished memory and brain function. Being 85 and still having a job for life is ridiculous.