As Gov. Kathleen Sebelius ponders how to fill three seats on the Kansas Board of Regents, the state’s governing board for higher education, the Lawrence Journal-World notes that 17 of 19 regents over the past decade contributed to the campaigns of the governors who appointed them; the donations involved range from $50 to $6,000. These positions seemingly entail too much hassle, travel and work to be considered political perks. And one regent, Sebelius appointee Frank Gaines of Hamilton, rightly suggested that governors naturally want to appoint people they know and trust. But it is a prestigious item for a resume, and any appearance of quid pro quo is nothing to applaud.
Posted by Rhonda Holman
-
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in. -
Contact us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- JMWalker on Is McCain overusing the ‘POW card’?
- JWink on Open thread 8/28
- Ray Thornton on Gorbachev blames West for Georgia crisis
- Nathaniel on Open thread 8/27
- Nathaniel on Tiahrt pumps gas, Jordan’s campaign
- ictBest on Find common ground on arena neighborhood needs
- Chas on Open thread 8/27
- Agnatha on Clinton did her part Tuesday
- MaxGrobnik on Open thread 8/27
- Chas on Open thread 8/27
4 Comments
Let me guess. None of the Board members are from Wichita and they are not going to pick one from here to replace the open seat either.
Another close examination of a POTENTIAL speck in the Democratic govenor’s eye while ignoring the logs falling on the heads of the constitutents of our so-called Republican Senators and Congressmen.
Real nice . . .
Let’s not forget that political appointments are political. Contributing to a political candidate does not cause one to lose their abilities.
Giving political money is not in itself bad, but shouldn’t there be public dislosure of any contributions at the time of the appointment so they public can decide for themselves? For example, why didn’t someone (perhaps the press?) tell the public that soon-to-be Kansas Supreme Court Justice Rosen’s wife gave NINE contributions to Sebelius at the time Judge Rosen was deciding if Sebelius’ closed meetings were legal ( see http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2003/11-01.htm )? How did the press miss that story as Rosen became the fifth Democrat, against two Republicans, on the Kansas Suprme Court when Kansas only has 27% Democrats ( http://www.kansasmeadowlark.com/2005/07-22.htm )?