Morale, though low, appears to be improving among soldiers in Iraq. Fifty-four percent of soldiers questioned as part of an Army survey last year said that morale in their individual units was either low or very low — an improvement from 72 percent who said the same thing a year earlier. But with the Army struggling to meet its recruitment goals, it will have to look at ways to address the soldiers’ main concerns — one being the length of deployments. Otherwise, it could be looking at even larger recruitment shortfalls.
Posted by Melissa Cooley
Registered?
Commenting on WE Blog now requires you to be a Kansas.com member. Use the links above to register, if you haven't already, or to log in.Contact us
Follow us
Daily Archives
-
Recent Comments
- minutelady on Open thread 11/23
- Phantom on Open thread 11/23
- minutelady on Open thread 11/23
- XXX on Open thread 11/23
- ANTI on Let immigrants run
- Phantom on Let immigrants run
- XXX on Open thread 11/23
- Phantom on Too many exemptions
- Phantom on Too many exemptions
- situveux1 on Too many exemptions
20 Comments
According to sources close to the president (we think it’s probably Carl Rove) the republican party has now mandated that all republicans must serve six months in Iraq either in the armed services or as Halliburton support personnel. Failure to register for service by August 1, 2005 will result in disqualification of past tax cuts.
Stop loss is a bitch. These kids think they’re only chained for a year, and a year turns into 2. No wonder their morale is low.
Tara, you think Stop Loss is a bitch now, check the latest numbers on recruitment short-falls.
Count on at least 3.5 more years in Iraq. I wonder how they plan to staff for that? I can’t imagine having to go to Iraq 3-4 times, but what else are they going to do if they can’t find enough warm bodies?
Draft, anyone?
Why did USAToday report just last week that re-enlistment was UP? Hey, the sky, it’s not falling!
Bisoni, maybe because either USA Today or you don’t know what they, or you, are talking about.
” Defense Department figures at the end of April showed that 35,926 recruits had signed up this fiscal year, which began last Oct. 1. This gives recruiters four months to sign up another 44,000 to meet their goal. Even worse is the number of reserves. Statistics show that 7,283 reserves have signed up. The goal is for 22,175 by the end of the year.”http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,FL_recruiting_060305,00.html?ESRC=eb.nl
“The Army announced yesterday that it missed its recruiting goal for the fourth consecutive month, a deepening manpower crisis that officials said would require a dramatic summer push for recruits if the service is to avoid missing its annual enlistment target for the first time since 1999.”http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/10/AR2005061001897.html
“WASHINGTON — The U.S. Army probably will come up well short of the 80,000 new recruits it needs during fiscal 2005, despite adding 3,000 recruiters, boosting enlistment cash bonuses to a record $20,000, spending $200 million on upbeat television ads and beginning to lower its standards.”http://www.twincities.com/mld/twincities/news/nation/11923733.htm
“As announced yesterday, the Army National Guard is currently behind in its recruiting goal. In this period of international turmoil and national disasters, we must do everything in our power to see this trend reversed.”http://www.senate.gov/~landrieu/releases/05/2005712A36.htmlMaybe recruitment numbers have gone from “dismal” to merely “crappy”. I guess you could call that an “improvement”.
Aren’t we suppose to be a lean and mean force? Having fallin numbers isn’t so bad. We are closing bases and operations anyways.
The military will be ok.
Good point, Joe. Why don’t we reduce it to one guy and a button? That’s all it would take.
Hehehe, don’t confuse Jimmy with the facts. He’ll just watch more Faux News to compensate . . .
We wouldn’t have a recruiting problem if the Republicans would just send their kids.
Yeah, like that will happen . . . Jenna and Barb are far away from where the bullets fly, just like Daddy was.
Since it’s Republicans who support this war, let’s just let republicans fight the whole thing. I read a piece recently where they interviewed College Republicans about why they weren’t fighting the war. Their answers were interesting. They feel they’re doing a more important job here at home by rallying support for the war (that’s not working so well). Republicans love war, as long as it’s someone else who’s doing the dying. Note that the most strident war supporters in our government are people who have never been shot at (see “Chickenhawks”).
Hammer hammer hammer,You usually post so well! But I gotta help you out here. Ya gotta NAME the chicken hawks! You know like Nathan and Hank….and bush, and rush, and hannity, and cheney, and …….nevermind.My bad. The chickenhawks define themselves. It is up to us to get them to commit to the fight they want. A draft maybe? No that didn’t work with bush, or rush, or cheney or nathan.
That is a brilliant idea Hammer!
Since it is the liberals who want to raise taxes, lets let them pay more taxes!
Since it’s the evangelicals that think we’re all going to hell, let them be the first to go.
Nathan, please lead the way.
JR, I appoligize for my oversight. I’ll try to do better next time, LOL.
As my old pappy used to say “bomb them all and let God sort it out”, but that would contaminate the oil wouldn’t it?
Yes, Nathan, I can afford to pay more taxes and I will pay more taxes if that means
1. Bush will use the money to pay down the national debt instead of increasing it
2. shore up social security
3. develop national health care.
As for conservatives, since they don’t want to pay taxes, they should stop driving on the roads, stop protecting themselves with the “liberal’s” military, and stop borrowing money to pay for unfunded programs.
You could wade in the hypocrisy of the right.Military recruitment down? Increase the benefits for joining! A good and worthy idea and I agree with it. Our soldiers deserve the best. But who are we mining here? The poor. And we all get to pay for it. Hmmm…. shared burden for the common good.
What if we went to a draft? I mean a fair draft with no exemptions. After all we are “at war”. Shouldn’t the risk and cost be shared? After all, we are all at equal peril aren’t we? Hmmm……..more shared burden for the common good.But…..wait a minute. Shared burden for the common good is…it’s…well it’s SOCIALISM. We can’t have SOCIALISM!I submit that unless and until we have society where “the strong are just, and the weak are secure, and the peace is preserved” that the strong and those against peace do the fighting and the paying for the fighting.
You could wade in the hypocrisy of the right.Military recruitment down? Increase the benefits for joining! A good and worthy idea and I agree with it. Our soldiers deserve the best. But who are we mining here? The poor. And we all get to pay for it. Hmmm…. shared burden for the common good.
What if we went to a draft? I mean a fair draft with no exemptions. After all we are “at war”. Shouldn’t the risk and cost be shared? After all, we are all at equal peril aren’t we? Hmmm……..more shared burden for the common good.But…..wait a minute. Shared burden for the common good is…it’s…well it’s SOCIALISM. We can’t have SOCIALISM!I submit that unless and until we have society where “the strong are just, and the weak are secure, and the peace is preserved” that the strong and those against peace do the fighting and the paying for the fighting.
Oh, and I’d also be willing to pay higher taxes if that means that our boys fighting in Iraq got the best armor we could give them.
But Bush would rather cut taxes for the rich. Strange priorities . . .
I agree JR, if every parent in this country had to risk their child, we’d probably be a lot more reluctant about invading other countries. It was the same in Vietnam, all the working class kids went, most of the rich ones stayed in college.
The Zionists will kill us all.
Despite optimistic reports in the Israeli press about Tel Aviv’s bid to end a crisis with the US over arms exports in general and arms sales to China in particular, Israel’s “compliance” with Washington’s demands is not convincing.
Haaretz reported that even Israel’s friends in the US Congress and the American Israel Public Affairs Committee have criticised its management of the crisis and urged it to avoid exacerbating the conflict.Sources in Washington familiar with Israeli tactics of deception are sceptical of any new memorandum of understanding that may be concluded to curtail Israeli clandestine activities to sell advanced arms in violation of American laws.
They point to the Chinese-Israeli history of military cooperation as stark evidence.
China projecting power
The successful test of a Chinese submarine-launched ballistic missile a couple of weeks ago has once again brought attention to the growing strategic power projection of this Asian country.
The new missile is capable of delivering a nuclear weapon up to 9000 km, which allows its submarines to remain near the Chinese coast, under a military umbrella, while engaging in potential military operations anywhere in the world.
US Secretary of Defence Donald Rumsfeld noted that “China is improving its ability to project power, and developing advanced systems of military technology”.”Israel could not have sold any technology to China without tacit approval from the master!”
Greenton, UK
More comments…
What Rumsfeld didn’t elaborate on was where China has acquired much of its military technology from and how “America’s strategic partner” had violated several American laws on the export and third party transfer of critical military technologies.
Although Russian technology plays a part in its programmes, much of China’s advanced technology has come from the Israelis, who have often sold their own technology or American technology that was given to them.
An Israeli Foreign Ministry spokesman put the 2004 trade volume with China at $2.4 billion, saying this did not include defence deals. Defence Ministry figures are not official, but Israel’s Channel Two television said Israel sells China some $2.5 billion of satellite technology and arms per annum.
As a result, the US has recently embargoed new defence sales to Israel until it satisfactorily settles the dispute over unauthorised sales of technology to China. It has even threatened Israeli participation in the new Joint Strike Fighter being built by Lockheed Martin.Although the US has occasionally stopped Israeli sales to China, like the Phalcon Airborne warning system, many sales have either been ignored or done secretly.
This sort of blindness to espionage is not the norm for American intelligenceIn many cases, like the sale of Patriot missile technology, the transfer had to be kept secret because Israel knew that the US would veto the sale.From the Israeli point of view, a partnership with China is ideal. Israel has a small, advanced industrial base. Its technology rivals anything out of Europe or the US. However, the inefficiencies of staying on a wartime basis have made it small and inefficient.
China, on the other hand, has a large industrial base that is in need of technology. And, China has the hard currency to pay for that technology.Although the current disagreement is over Israel’s upgrading of Chinese drones that are capable of finding radar units, the pattern of Israeli sales goes back much longer.
In fact, they have specialised in selling China “multiplier” technology – advances that multiply the effectiveness of an army, allowing it to fight toe-to-toe with the most advanced armies in the world.There is no better example of this type of sale than the transfer of Electronic Intelligence (ELINT) technology that is seen in the upgrade of the Chinese drone aircraft. ELINT gathering equipment is critical for a modern army.
It allows aircraft to detect the electronic emissions of enemy units, categorise them as to their purpose, and help determine the level of threat.
Israel, which has an advanced electronics industry, has gladly offered the Chinese the equipment that has been designed specifically for detecting and countering systems used by many nations in the Middle East.
From the Israeli point of view, a partnership with China is ideal
A weapons system that is heavily reliant on electronic technology is the Chinese anti-radiation missile (YJ-9) which is designed to home in on radar units and destroy them.
This is a high priority programme for the Chinese and much of its technology came from the Israeli’s Star Arms missile system.
It had been designed to specifically home in on American electronic emissions like the Awacs aircraft, the Patriot missile radar, and the Aegis phased array radar on American warships.
High technology
The ability to counter these American systems came from the Israelis, who had access to the technologies of these systems. And, these technology transfers were in direct contradiction of the Missile Technology Control Regime.The Chinese YJ-9 is not the only missile to benefit from Israeli sales. The Chinese HQ-9 Medium Range Surface to Air Missile also has technology from the American Patriot Missile System.
The technology came to the Chinese via the Israelis who received it supposedly for development of their Arrow Anti-ballistic Missile.
It not only makes Chinese SAMs more effective, but renders Chinese ballistic missiles harder to intercept since they know the strengths and weaknesses of a major anti-ballistic missile system.Israeli missile technology sales are not limited to these. Tel Aviv has purportedly licensed the production of its short range Python air-to-air missile.
As a result of this help, China’s missile industry is commonly known as, “an island of excellence”.
This is a dramatic development considering that just 30 years ago China did not have any indigenous missile technology base to speak of. Now they are a major supplier of missiles around the world.But, sales alone are not the only threat posed by China. The country is rapidly gaining the ability to project power far beyond its borders and much of that technology is coming from Israel.
Israel has managed to escape any major punishment for its actions because of its special relationship with the US
One aspect to power projection is the development of a “blue water” navy. And Israel has done much to help China in that regard.
Within the last month, American intelligence published a report that expressed surprise at several key military developments that would allow Beijing to project its military power.
One of those developments was the deployment of a new Chinese warship equipped with a Chinese version of the American Aegis Battle Management technology.
This technology, again, came via Israeli sources, which also provided the information that allows Chinese anti-radiation missiles to successfully acquire and destroy the Aegis phased array radar.
Escaping punishment
Israel is not just satisfied with selling technology. It is transforming the Chinese industrial base in order to make it more efficient.
Given the Chinese industrial base’s limited technology, Israel has been forced to send advisers and technicians to China’s military factories to help them overcome long standing weaknesses in design, engineering and systems integration.
This help will allow the Chinese to develop better indigenous weapons, integrate foreign technology faster, and reverse engineer stolen weapons systems successfully.
By sending advisers and technicians to China to help upgrade its arms factories, Israel is not only giving them the technology but the ability to better use it and capitalise on it in the future.Israel has managed to escape any major punishment for its actions because of its special relationship with the US.
In a recent highly classified report for the new Director of America’s National Intelligence, American analysts were accused of not recognising the Chinese military technology threat.
Interestingly, the report faulted American intelligence for failing to see technological developments in areas where Israel was actively involved.
This sort of blindness to espionage is not the norm for American intelligence. When France was accused of industrial espionage a few years ago, the US government made an international issue of it.
When European countries sold technology to Iraq, the US imposed sanctions. But, for Israel, it has kept relatively quiet and the transfer of technology from America to Israel continues despite the recent events.