Monthly Archives: June 2009

Here’s a good example of the trustworthyness of “public journalism.”

It simply can’t be trusted. This just yesterday from Photo District News:

6a00d8341ce76f53ef0115718958cd970b-800wi

“Photo of Protester Giving Ahmadinejad the Finger Almost Certainly Fake”

“…It’s maddeningly difficult to check the validity of pictures people link to on Twitter. But in this case, we’re reasonably sure this one has been faked. We found a similar copy of the same photo floating around that shows a woman gesturing, but not flipping the bird….”

First commentL “Ah, the perils of citizen journalism. If you thought there was no truth in traditional media, this is what the future holds as web 3.0 becomes fertile ground for flaks, fundamentalists and propagandists. ”

Barstools and the morning paper

Sometimes I see something and I just gotta stop & shoot.

barstools

On an assignment to photograph yet another new bar in Old Town and saw this guy reading the morning paper outside as I was leaving. Just had to stop & make a snap.

Another unpublished feature shot

051909stables_mh1-copy1

Marina Bradburn of Eckoi Construction paints the trim on windows at The Stables, an office building owned by Mark Janzen Property management. The building at 322 South Mosley served as a horse stables for a local ice house when it was built after the turn of the century.

People painting things and/or people on ladders make good feature fodder.

Kansas’s own Appalachia

Twenty five years ago I spent a few days in the southeast corner of Kansas working on a story about the former lead and zinc mining towns of Galena, Treece and Picher Oklahoma.

I returned last week to Treece and saw little had changed except that now the town of Picher is vacant, a stone’s throw across the gravel state-line road.

The town is beset with pollution, poverty and nowhere to go.

A century of mining that built Treece has left a legacy of heavy-metal tainted water and soil, surrounded by mountains of toxic mine tailings. Treece residents hope the federal government will buy them out and settle them elsewhere, as it did with neighboring Picher, Okla. Here's the story and a gallery.

From the balcony

I photographed the new construction on the remodel of the Old Town Warren Theatre this afternoon, I must say that I am always impressed when I step foot into one of Mr. Warren’s movie houses. Even his remodeling jobs have that old theatre look to them. 

Old Town Warren Theatre

I grew up in Augusta and the old Augusta Theatre was and still is my favorite places to see a movie. Near the top of my favorite places also was the old Crest Theatre on east Douglas. This photograph was taken on the last night it was open.  crest-2

I miss the old places like the Crest, but I am glad Mr. Warren has helped keep those memories living. I am not a movie freak, but I do enjoy going and the Warren still gives me that feel of the old movie houses…The popcorn prices are for another blog!

Color

© William Eggleston

© William Eggleston

My first years in serious photography were rooted firmly in black and white. As far as I was concerned, b/w pictures were more pure than color “snapshots.” Years later the Wichita Eagle invested in some high-dollar offset presses and color became the standard, like it or not.

Although my tastes still have a monochromatic baseline, I have to admit there were those who shined a light down a different path.

William Eggleston, courtesy Eggleston Artistic Trust

William Eggleston, courtesy Eggleston Artistic Trust

“Remember that scene where Dorothy and Toto realize they’re not in Kansas anymore? That same combined sensation of awe, homesickness and hallucination probably described the crowd at the Museum of Modern Art in 1976, as they stood before William Eggleston’s color photography exhibit for the first time….”

I’d like to introduce you to one who still continues to develop my vision, William Eggleston.

More digital shenanigans, this time from Time magazine.

Certainly, magazine cover photographs bear the burden of “selling” the magazine, an old-school concept to boost newsstand sales. And it appears that news publication editors more frequently believe they can digitally manipulate images on their covers and absolve themselves by adding a disclaimer.

© Time, Inc, 2009

© Time, Inc, 2009

The disclaimer, “PHOTOGRAPH FROM SIPA PRESS. DIGITALLY ALTERED. INSETS, FROM LEFT: PHOTOGRAPH BY RAOUL BENAVIDES FOR TIME; PHOTO-ILLUSTRATION BY C.J. BURTON FOR TIME,” is on Time’s website, and I suspect it’s also in the magazine.

Even here at the venerable Wichita Eagle we’ll tag “Photo Illustration by ….” onto images when it may not be obvious the picture was set up, staged or somehow altered after the fact if we don’t have an actual “news” image to illustrate the story.

That’s okay, I suppose, but I fear there is a cumulative effect of our lowering the trustworthy factor of photography produced by and for news organizations.

Over time and repeated exposure to made-up and manipulated images, I am concerned that news consumers are quickly approaching the point where they just won’t trust news organizations to deliver the truth.

”You know, if we photoshop a few extra people jumping from the Hindenburg, it would be a much better picture.”

”You know, if we photoshop a few extra people jumping from the Hindenburg, it would be a much better picture.”

So here’s the deal on news photography, at least from my 28-year perspective: The image should not give the pretense that something was happening when it wasn’t.

For example, a portrait is a portrait. Few people would assume a business owner just “happened” to be sitting on the corner of his desk when I walked by and snapped his picture, or a perky young lady just “happened” to be posturing in a Montgomery Ward-like fashion pose when I shot her sweater.

A news/feature photograph is a visual quote; we don’t make up quotes, we don’t make up photographs. If a quote is cumbersome, a writer will paraphrase. If an illustration is better suited to make the point, so be it, I suppose, or just go with a map or graph or drawing. But the image shouldn’t pretend to be something it is not.

Trust me.

Photoshop & Politics

While it’s been said the camera doesn’t lie — and there are many, including me, who would take issue with that axiom — it’s an unfortunate belief that photographers (or more likely those who handle their pictures) can at least fudge the content of an image. Particularly pictures intended to sell products or ideas.

A recent example of manipulation is one from Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and his Photoshop cronies trying to convince everyone he had more supporters in a rally then were actually there.

ehtics1

That’s not stop-the-presses news, however, because last year he was outed doing the same thing with missiles.

missiles

Before we join the other protesters decrying his attempts at wholesale deception, however, consider that Ahmadinejad may have taken his lead from National Geographic’s infamous 1983 cover wherein a pyramid was nudged a few hundred yards to make a vertical picture from a horizontal one.

geo

“National Geographic magazine, long known for its reputation of photojournalism excellence, used the Scitex computer digitizer on two…occasions. On a cover story of Egypt, pyramids were squeezed together to fit the cover’s vertical format. A picture story on Poland contained a cover photograph that combined an expression on a man’s face in one frame with a complete view of his hat in another picture. Both cover images were altered without a hint of possible detection and without a note to readers that such manipulation was performed.”

“…Rich Clarkson, director of photography at National Geographic [and former photo editor of the Topeka Capital Journal] when the pyramid and Poland covers were faked, said he had no ethical problem with combining two photographs into a single cover picture, although ‘some publications could start abusing’.”
(“Faking images in photojournalism,” Photojournalism: An Ethical Approach, Paul Martin Lester, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, 1991.)

Thanks for the idea, Rich.

Attack cat!

Well, he was more like a playful cat than an attack cat. Check out the last few seconds of this video and you’ll see what I’m talking about. I love the audio of the woman standing next to me who said (referring to the cat, of course), “I have a little attitude, a little cat-itude.”

Remembering LuVerne

The Eagle lost another alum this week. LuVerne Paine, the first woman to be hired on the Eagle’s photo staff died this week at age 91. I visited LuVerne last year on her 90th birthday and despite failing health at that time she still had fond memories of her many years spent at the Eagle.

I talked with Charlie Rollins this morning and he gave me some details on LuVerne’s career, a lot I didn’t know. Charlie was a longtime Eagle photographer later to become chief photographer who hired me back in 1979. He remembers LuVerne starting at the Eagle in the early 1950s.

LuVerne in the 1950's.

LuVerne in the 1950s.

Charlie said her main job back then was to receive and send AP and UPI wire photos. She later moved into the darkroom to help print photo reprints and maintain the darkroom chemistry. As her knowledge of photography increased, she was asked to take on many photo assignments in our studio. There she shot probably thousands of portraits and whatever else needed to be shot in the studio.

She was the lone woman on an all-male photo staff but LuVerne had the temperament to hold her own amongst the crustiest of photojournalists, and back in the 50s they were pretty crusty.

When photographers were first hired LuVerne took it upon herself to let them know the right and wrong way to maintain the studio or darkroom. And as I remember, if you got under her skin she’d let you know about it with no uncertain terms. I think Jerry Clark got under her skin every once in a while. Jerry was a longtime Wichita Beacon photographer who came over to the competition (The Eagle) when the paper merged in the ’60s. I can recall at least a few arguments between the two back in the darkroom, perhaps remnants of our newspaper rivalries. But none of those arguments ever lasted too long and were never remembered the next day.

LuVerne was well liked by everyone who worked with her and everyone I’ve talked to this morning had nothing but good things to say about her. I guess she was pretty much a pioneer in the local newspaper business. The first woman Eagle photographer…no one else can say that LuVerne. It was good to know you.

Leave your memories of LuVerne in our digital condolence book.