Saturday musings before the big one

* Louisville’s first season as a Missouri Valley Conference was in 1964-65, the same season in which the Shockers reached the Final Four. That Cardinals team was 15-10 and coached by Bernard “Peck” Hickman, who had been at Louisville since 1944. Hickman lasted only two more seasons at Louisville, retiring after the 1966-67 season, when the Cardinals were 23-5.

* Louisville was a Valley member from 1964-65 through 1974-75 and during its brief time won or tied for seven MVC championships.

* Wichita State never beat the Cardinals in Louisville. The Shockers came close a few times. In 1969-70, Louisville beat WSU, 59-58, at Freedom Hall. The next season, the Cardinals won, 98-97, in overtime. And in 1971-72, Louisville eked out a 65-64 win. Three of the 11 WSU-Louisville games played in Wichita went to overtime and one went two overtimes. Louisville won two of them.

* My memories from Louisville-Wichita State center around the Cardinals’ Wes Unseld and Wichita State’s Warren Armstrong. They matched up many times and had an epic battle in 1967-68 at WSU’s Roundhouse, one of those overtime games won by Louisville, 93-91. Even though Armstrong was only 6-foot-2, he had the strength and athleticism to match-up against the powerful 6-8 Unseld, one of college basketball’s all-time greats.

* There were many outstanding players from WSU and Louisville during that era. Some of the best from the Shockers’ side included: Armstrong, Jamie Thompson, Kelly Pete, Ron Washington, Melvin Reed, Greg Carney, Ron Mendell, Ron Harris, Terry Benton, Preston Carrington, Vince Smith, Rich Morsden, Bob Wilson, Calvin Bruton, Robert Elmore and Cheese Johnson, whose career started the season after Louisville left the Valley but included one game against the Cardinals.

* Some of the best Louisville players of that era included: Unseld, John Reuther, Butch Beard, Mike Grosso, Jim Price, Al Vilcheck, Ron Thomas, Allen Murphy and Junior Bridgeman.

* This is the biggest game in Wichita State history. I know the Shockers were in another Final Four, back in 1965. But college basketball wasn’t the three-headed beast it is today. Those national semifinal games in Portland, Ore., were played at 9 and 11 p.m., CST. On a Friday night. They were not nationally televised. If I remember correctly – and I was 10 at the time, so don’t take this to the bank – the game was shown at the Roundhouse on closed circuit television. Was I there? I was afraid you were going to ask. I’m not sure. Isn’t that terrible? You would think I would remember something like that, which I don’t. So that must mean I wasn’t there. But I was a rabid WSU fan as a kid so I’m sure I must have begged my father to take me. If the game was televised at the Roundhouse, which I’m not sure it was. Wow. This is embarrassing.

* The Shockers didn’t leave for Portland until the Thursday morning before the Friday night game. There were no news conferences when they arrived in Oregon. It was just another game. Yes, it was a Final Four and a relatively big deal compared to the rest of the college basketball season. But it wasn’t like it is today.

* Of course, Wichita State lost to UCLA in the national semifinals in 1965, 118-82. The Shockers played a third-place game against Princeton, and again lost in a blowout. The national championship game between UCLA and Michigan, won by the Bruins, was televised nationally and in Wichita on then-KTVH, Channel 12.

* I often played basketball by myself in my backyard as a kid. No, it wasn’t because I didn’t have any friends. It’s just what kids did then. Not so much now. Anyway, being the Wichita State fan I was, I would broadcast the imaginary games I was playing. Something like this: “Pete’s got it at the top of the key, he passes to Stallworth, who dribbles to the corner. Bowman is open inside, he’s got it for a 10-footer. Good. Bowman puts Wichita State in front of Cincinnati, 45-44.” Rick Weaver, who later went on to become the radio voice of the Miami Dolphins, is the first broadcaster I remember. Gus Grebe, who I believe followed Weaver, is the most popular. I wanted to be those guys when I was a kid and I practiced my play-by-play for hours and hours while also practicing basketball. It was a two-for-the-price-of-one thing. I remember those imaginary games like they were yesterday. Unlike whether or not I went to watch a broadcast of WSU in the Final Four. Funny how the brain does – and doesn’t – work.

* I have completely lost touch with my television viewing during the NCAA Tournament. But I was able to see the season finales of “The Walking Dead” and “Justified” during my pit stop in Wichita, before heading for Atlanta and the Final Four. Those are two incredible shows. I’m looking forward to the debut of “Mad Men,” tomorrow night.

* My son, who has been covering this incredible Wichita State basketball journey with me, is a little star struck. He tweets about exchanging pleasantries with CBS studio host Greg Gumble and about walking past talk-show radio host Jim Rome. It’s cute. He’s 30, but it’s still cute.

* Jeff and I have to figure out a way to watch “Wrestlemania” tomorrow night. Somewhere, somehow.

* Not happy about the way the St. Louis Cardinals have limped out of the gates at 1-3. I’m worried about everything at the moment: Pitching, defense, hitting, bullpen. Thank goodness I’ve had a big distraction that has kept me from stewing about all of this.

 

 

Two sides of the story

Copy and paste this link for some video insight from The Eagle’s very own Wichita State beat writer, Paul Suellentrop.

 

http://www.ovguide.com/video/wichita-state-has-5-chance-of-winning-ffc0b3009bde11e2ab9e12313d04ba4a

 

http://www.ovguide.com/video/wichita-state-has-5-chance-of-winning-ffc0b3009bde11e2ab9e12313d04ba4a

Memories of a sports writer

I guess there are still memories to be had, even for somebody who has been writing about sports for as long as I have.

And this week is one of those times as Wichita State approaches its first Final Four in 48 years. It’s a privilege for me to be writing about the Shockers on this big stage and to represent the Wichita Eagle in Atlanta and during WSU’s previous stops in Salt Lake City and Los Angeles.

This is history and that’s not lost on me. In fact, I would go so far as to say getting to cover this Final Four run is the highlight of my professional career. I might as well just go ahead and retire after this is over. But don’t get your hopes up because I have bills to pay.

I was a 10-year-old rabid Shocker fan in 1965, when WSU was beaten in the national semifinals by UCLA, then dropped a third-place game (thank goodness they don’t have those anymore) to Princeton and Bill Bradley.

My father and I, I’m sure, went to every home game that season. As I’ve written about before, I was a huge Wichita State basketball fan as a kid and getting to talk this week to former Shockers Kelly Pete (now Mohamed Sharif), Dave Leach and Vernon Smith has been a surreal experience. It always is. I’ve interviewed WSU players from that era numerous times in my journalism career and it’s always such a strange experience because these were my sports heroes growing up.

My favorite athlete of all-time is former St. Louis Cardinals pitcher Bob Gibson. He’s followed closely, though, by former Shocker All-America basketball player Dave Stallworth, who unfortunately missed out on being a member of the ’65 Final Four team because of eligibility issues. His ran out in late January of that season in one of the strangest twists in college basketball history. I don’t know who was in charge of eligibility in those days, but whoever it was really dropped the ball.

As we’ve covered this team more and more, deeper and deeper into the tournament, it’s been impressive to see how the players and coaching staff has handled the deluge of media publicity. This is a good group that, as far as I can tell, hasn’t let any of this go to their heads. They have remained down to earth, humble and proud of what they have accomplished but not changed by those accomplishments.

If there’s a commonality between the teams of previous coach Mark Turgeon and those of current coach Greg Marshall, it’s that they recruit good players and good people. The 2006 team of Turgeon’s that made a run to the Sweet 16 was filled with exemplary guys and this team is, too.

What happens in Atlanta?

To no one’s surprise, the Shockers are an underdog to Louisville, the No. 1 overall seed when the 68 tournament teams were announced a few weeks ago. They’re a big underdog, 10 1/2 points last I checked.

But Wichita State has been an underdog to Pittsburgh, Gonzaga and Ohio State in this tournament. And the Shockers survived and advanced. They built double-digit leads against all three and had the Buckeyes down 20 points in the second half before a late comeback.

Louisville deserves all of its accolades. The Cardinals have everything, including a stifling defense – full- and half-court – that is sure to cause Wichita State problems.

But the Shockers have counter punchers. Their guards match up reasonably well, I believe. Maybe I’m delusional, who knows?

As you know, I’m jaded, curmudgeonly, sarcastic and rude. Well, I try not to be rude. I do try. But I’m glad I’m getting to experience this incredible moment in Wichita State basketball history. It stems mostly back to my youth and memories of my father. Much of my sports world circles around my dad, Ray, who I have been fortunate enough to get to write about over the years.

He took me to so many games when I was a kid. And it was through that experience that everything I’ve gotten to do in my life as it relates to sports has come about.

My dad was a huge Shocker fan, too. When we weren’t at a home game, we were listening to road games on the radio. The Shockers and Cardinals were our bond. I’m glad I was able to work for eight years at the newspaper before my father passed away in 1982. Moments like this always make me think about him and how proud he was of me and the Shockers.

We’re both doing something pretty cool this week.

 

Friday musings, LA edition

* Sounds like the Wichita State Shockers are growing weary of the media exposure they’ve been getting lately. Who can blame them? It’s one interview after another for these guys in the NCAA Tournament, to the point where they’re just saying the same things over and over gain.

* The Shocker players have been great, though. What a polite group of guys. I’ve made it my personal challenge in Salt Lake City and here in Los Angeles to try to get sophomore guard Tekele Cotton to open up some. Results are mixed. He’s a quiet guy. But I’m usually pretty good and cracking people. Just give me a little more time and the words will come flowing out of Cotton the way lava flows from Old Faithful.

* Can Wichita State beat Ohio State? Of course. But things will have to fall into place. Ohio State is big, athletic and quick. Deshaun Thomas might be the most gifted offensive player in the country and it doesn’t look like the Shockers, at least on paper, have a match for him defensively.

* Perhaps junior forward Cleanthony Early draws the defensive assignment on Thomas. But that would be a tough one for Early, who has at times struggled defensively. And it might also wear him down to the point that his offensive effectiveness would be compromised. WSU coach Gregg Marshall could give defender-deluxe Tekele Cotton the chore of covering Thomas, although he would be giving away five inches. That’s a real detriment; remember how Cotton, despite his great ability as a defender, struggled with Creighton’s 6-8 Doug McDermott this season. It’ll be interesting to see how Marshall goes about defending the Buckeyes. That’s first and foremost the most telling aspect of any Wichita State game, given how much the Shockers stress defense.

* Sophomore forward Jake White played just a few mop-up minutes in the Shockers’ 72-58 Sweet 16 win over La Salle on Thursday. It was strictly a match-up thing and I look for the 6-8 White to be on the floor often against the powerful Buckeyes. He could be an X factor, especially if he can knock down a couple of shots.

* One of the keys for the Shockers will be trying to keep Ohio State junior guard Aaron Craft from controlling the tempo. I think Cotton will probably guard Craft and attempt to pressure him on the perimeter so that he can’t get into the lane and dish out assists. Craft is a heady guard who understands the game. But Cotton loves these challenges and has made a name for himself in the Shockers’ three NCAA Tournament games.

* Ron Baker is feeling more and more comfortable with every game. He’s a warrior. I watched him specifically on quite a few possessions in Thursday night’s game against La Salle and he does it all. He’s a tough defender and loves to go the boards, especially if he smells an offensive rebound. He’s also a fantastic passer. In fact, I thought the Shockers had the best passing game I’ve seen from them this season against La Salle. I think Baker is a big part of that.

* To my friends who ask me what I’m doing for fun in LA. Well, not much. My son and I did go to dinner at Dan Tana’s the other night, the place where Glenn Frey got the idea for the Eagles’ song ‘Lyin’ Eyes.’ Then we went over to the Troubadour, which is just a few steps from Dan Tana’s, but we didn’t stay to hear the band. It was a punk band called Off With Their Heads. I love most styles of music, but not punk. What can I say?

* Otherwise, covering these tournaments is a lot of work. Yes, I use the term “work” loosely, because I’ve never really considered what I do to qualify. Maybe a better way to put it is to say covering the tournament is time consuming, even on the days when there are no games. It’s a process to come up with ideas, especially when most have been covered. Then there are the interviews and the time it takes to write the stuff. So I haven’t done much in Southern California. We were thinking of getting out to the Dodgers-Angels exhibition game tonight at Dodger Stadium, but we’re just too tired. Weak, I know.

* Thanks for reading. I’ll have some Saturday musings tomorrow before the big WSU-Ohio State game. It’s exciting. Thanks for reading.

 

How the Shockers stack up nationally

Just where is Wichita Statebasketball in a national scope?

The Shockers are in their second Sweet 16 in the past eight years. Only 29 other schools have been in multiple Sweet 16s during that time frame; another 30 have appeared in one Sweet 16 and a whole bunch

Duke coach Mike Krzyzewski has Duke on a high perch among the country’s Division I basketball programs.

have reached that status once.

Going into tonight’s Sweet 16 game against La Salle at Staples Center in Los Angeles, the Shockers are 109-32 the past four years. They reached the NIT in 2009-10, won the NIT in 2010-11, made a first-round NCAA Tournament exit in 2011-12 and this season have made it to where only three other WSU teams in history have gone.

Heady stuff. Gregg Marshall has taken the Shockers to new heights and there is no sign of a slow-down. WSU likely will start the 2013-14 season as a heavy favorite to win the Creighton-less Missouri Valley Conference and probably as a Top 25 club.

This all got me to thinking about where WSU – today – stacks up nationally. Where would I put them among the nation’s 345 Division I basketball schools?

So I went to work on some quick research. I found a group of programs that are obviously ahead of Wichita State. Then I defined a group that probably are ahead of the Shockers or at a similar level.

And I’m going to tell you, there’s no calling WSU a mid-major in today’s college basketball climate. The Shockers are a player with a bright future, an exciting present and a recent past that makes them viable in this discussion.

I’ve broken down the discussion into two categories: Clearly better and arguably better. Here we go:

Clearly better (19) – Florida, Duke, Georgetown, Gonzaga (15 consecutive tournaments), UCLA, Butler, Kansas, North Carolina, Ohio State, Indiana, Memphis, Louisville, Wisconsin, Michigan State, Xavier, Arizona, Syracuse, Kentucky, Marquette.

Arguably better (17) – Villanova, Connecticut, Oregon, UNLV, Baylor, New Mexico, Saint Mary’s, San Diego State, Michigan, Kansas State, VCU, Illinois, Creighton, Miami (Fla.), BYU, Oklahoma State, Cincinnati.

The case can be made, with some conviction, that Wichita State is a top 20 program. Right now. As we live and breathe. Lose to La Salle in a few hours and perhaps that case becomes more difficult.

The Shockers are no fluke. This run in the Sweet 16 did not come out of nowhere, despite what those in the national media might want to tell you. Marshall has been building this program since the day he set foot in Wichita in 2007. And he’s not methodical. The Shockers have made steady, tangible progress in each of Marshall’s six seasons.

At some point, the mountain becomes more difficult to climb. That could easily be the case after this season, since Sweet 16s don’t grow on trees. Then again, there will be no shortage of talent on the WSU roster next season. Marshall has a history of success that dates back to his nine seasons at Winthrop. He and his staff know how to recruit and they know hold to mold players.

It’s an exciting time to be a Wichita State basketball fan with the Shockers on a historic run of success.

There are programs in better shape than WSU’s. But thanks to four strong seasons in a row, there aren’t many.

 

Memories of a sports writer

My recollection is hazy, at best, but I remember the one sporting event I’ve covered in Los Angeles like it was yesterday.

Kansas State came here to play Southern California in football in 2001. It was Sept. 8. It was three days before 9/11.

The game was memorable because Kansas State won against a USC team with Carson Palmer at quarterback. He passed for 196 yards, but neither team could score. The Wildcats won, 10-6, even though K-State quarterback Ell Roberson passed for only 26 yards. Then again, he didn’t need to throw.

The star of the day for K-State was anyone who carried the football. Running back Josh Scobey gained 165 yards on 27 carries. Roberson added another 119 yards rushing on 21 carries and fullback Rock Cartwright rushed for another 56. Kansas State had 340 yards on the ground and scored 10 points.

It was a weird game played at the Coliseum, a stadium dripping with tradition. I was so caught up in being inside the place that the game, I’m sure, became secondary.

After the game, which was played in the afternoon, I went out to get something to eat near my hotel. Then I got up early the next morning, Sept. 10, to catch my flight back to Wichita. It was just another day in the life of a sports writer, even though it was spent in LA.

The next day, all hell broke loose. I was doing the radio show, Sports Daily, with Jarrod Bartlett. Bruce Haertl, who also had been covering the KSU-USC game for KWCH, had stayed in Los Angeles to visit his family. He ended up not making it back to Wichita for several days after the 9/11 attacks, finally renting a car and driving home because airports were shut down.

I’m sure we started off the Sept. 11, 2001, radio show talking about Kansas State’s big win. I know we had a guest on the show that day, my friend Kevin Haskin from the Topeka Capital-Journal. It was during our interview with Kevin that we noticed just how serious the situation was getting in New York City.

It was such a strange, sad day. We eventually stopped talking about sports and stopped our show, instead going to network coverage of the terrorist attacks. None of us, like none of you, could believe what was happening. I heard either that day or in the days shortly thereafter that the airport in Los Angeles had been a target of the terrorists. For a fleeting moment, I wondered what might have been.

But it was only fleeting.

All of my thoughts were with the victims of the attacks. And, like every other American, I could barely contain my rage.

I’m back in Los Angeles to cover another sports event – Wichita State’s appearance in the Sweet 16. The Shockers face La Salle Thursday night – really late Thursday – in the Staples Center.

It’s my second time in this venue. I was here for the Eagles’ Millennium concert – Dec. 31, 1999. Everybody was kind of worried then about what the crazies might do. Turned out they did nothing. The concert went off without a glitch and the Eagles played two songs – “Those Shoes” and “Funky New Year” – that I hadn’t heard them do before and haven’t heard since.

I like Los Angeles. I know it’s overcrowded and polluted, but it’s vibrant. You can feel it. As I type this, I’m a couple of hundred yards, at most, from the Nokia Theatre. Where the “American Idol” finale will air in a couple of months and where the Grammys were held a couple of months ago. We’re staying right in the hub of LA, near the Staples Center. There’s so much going on.

And tomorrow night, there’s the biggest basketball game in years for the Wichita State Shockers.

This is fun, people. My son, Jeff, and I are heading to The Troubadour shortly. That’s the historical nightclub where Eagles founders Don Henley and Glenn Frey met in 1970. We’re having dinner at Dan Tana’s. We’re feeling pretty good about our time in LA.

But Los Angeles does conjure those memories of 2001. Everybody was inside the Coliseum on a beautiful Saturday, taking in some college football. Two days later, all of those lives – and millions of others – were changed forever.

Have fun watching the Shockers. I know a bunch of WSU fans are making this journey. This is a great experience for them and I’m sure they’ll soak in everything LA has to offer.

Thanks for allowing me to ramble some in this blog post.

 

Cardinals preview

It’s important for me today to write about baseball in the midst of college basketball’s NCAA Tournament. I hope you’ll indulge me, even with Wichita State and Kansas in the Sweet 16. I’m writing columns about the Shockers and Jayhawks all week long. I’ll be in Los Angeles with the Shockers and I have plenty more to say and write about college hoops.

But with snow on the ground and basketballs still in the air, I need a little baseball. And the season starts in less than a week. I cannot wait.

The St. Louis Cardinals are my team and even in the wildness and craziness of the past week, I do

Cardinals right-hander Adam Wainwright is the team’s ace.

whatever it takes to follow my team. I’ve watched several of the Cardinals’ spring training games, read as much as I can read and come to a few conclusions.

It’s going to be an interesting season. The Cardinals are in a bit of a state of flux, what with the absence now of injured starting pitcher Chris Carpenter and shortstop Rafael Furcal.

But I like this team. I like the possibilities. But, as with the other 29 teams in MLB, what the Cardinals do or don’t do centers around starting pitching.

So let’s start there.

Starting pitching – Adam Wainwright is the No. 1. Now nearly two years removed from Tommy John surgery, and by all accounts nearing a big contract extension with the Cardinals, he’s the ace. And a good one. He’ll be followed in the rotation by left-hander Jaime Garcia and righties Jake Westbrook, Lance Lynn and Shelby Miller, a rookie. This could be a really strong rotation, but it depends on the health of Garcia and the readiness of Miller. Garcia is only 26 and has the talent to be a legitimate No. 2 starter. Miller can be a future ace. The Cardinals need them both to approach their ceilings this season if they are to challenge the Cincinnati Reds in the National League Central.

Bullpen – It doesn’t help that closer Jason Motte, one of the best in the National League, will start the season on the disabled list with some elbow irritation. Mitchell Boggs steps into the closer’s role, at least temporarily, while rookie Trevor Rosenthal assumes Boggs’ eighth-inning role. Edward Mujica is still slated to be the seventh-inning guy while the lefties are Marc Rzepczynski and Randy Choate. Fernando Salas and Joe Kelly are likely the other bullpen guys until Motte returns. There are some nice power arms in the Cardinals’ pen, but it’s not what it could be with Motte sidelined.

First base – Allen Craig is the guy here and if he can play 140 games, he’s capable of hitting 30 homers and driving in 110 runs. The key is being healthy. If Craig misses time, rookie Matt Adams will be the guy. Adams is a powerful left-handed hitter who has had a big spring. He looks like a born hitter and he’ll be on the roster to start the season.

Second base – The Cardinals wisely asked left-handed hitting Matt Carpenter to work out at second base curing the offseason after Carpenter batted over .300 in a utility role in 2012. He’s a hitter and now he’s put himself in the mix to get some starts at second, sharing the position with Daniel Descalso. I like both of these guys a lot. I think Descalso will have his best offensive season by far. And prospect Kolten Wong is in the wings if these two can’t get it done.

Third base – Like Craig, the only question about Freese is his health. He had a relatively injury-free season in 2012 and put up nice numbers. He’s a dangerous hitter, part of a middle-of-the-order for the Cardinals that is capable of putting up big numbers. Too often last season, though, it was feast or famine. St. Louis rarely had everyone in its lineup clicking at once.

Shortstop – Warning, warning, warning. The Cardinals do not have a proven shortstop, what with Furcal scheduled to miss the season after elbow surgery. Pete Kozma, who was so good in September last season and even better in the Cardinals’ playoff run, gets the first shot. As he should. It’s possible that Kozma has simply found himself as a big leaguer, even after a lackluster few years in the minor leagues. If not, though, the Cardinals are left to scramble. Descalso has played some shortstop and is adequate. But he’s better at second and even third base. This might be an area the Cardinals have to address quickly. Then again, maybe Kozma is ready. We’ll see.

Left field – Matt Holliday is the left fielder. And he’ll be the left fielder, the Cardinals hope, for about 150 games. He’ll bat third in the lineup. There is no mystery here.

Center field – Ever after proving himself as a .300 hitter over the past three seasons, some question Jay’s staying power. Not me. I like his defense and he’s a good hitter. Not a great hitter and not one with much power. But he’s a good hitter, good enough to be in the leadoff position for 130-140 games. When Jay isn’t in the lineup, look for Shane Robinson. He’s had a terrific spring.

Right field – Veteran Carlos Beltran is the guy here, but look for manager Mike Matheny to be careful about how much Beltran is used. He’s 35 and prone to injury. Beltran can still be a huge threat, but the Cardinals are going to give him more time off in 2013. When he’s out, St. Louis can play Craig in right and Adams at first. Or Carpenter in right. Or . . . are you ready? . . . 20-year-old Oscar Taveras. It’s likely Taveras opens the season at Triple-A Memphis, but he’s ready to be a big leaguer. His time is approaching quickly.

Catcher – Yadier Molina is the best in the business. Or second best in the business to San Francisco’s Buster Posey. Tony Cruz has the loneliest job in the big leagues, backing up Molina.

Bench – Descalso, Robinson, Adams, Cruz and newcomer Ty Wigginton should form the bench when the season begins. As always, it’ll be constantly evolving.

Prediction – The Cincinnati Reds still look like the best team in the NL Central. But the Cardinals could challenge if that starting rotation pans out. There are some question marks there. I look for 87 to 90 wins. But I see a ceiling of 95 if Garcia and Miller have good, healthy seasons. The Washington Nationals, Atlanta Braves, Los Angeles Dodgers and San Francisco Giants are the other dynamite teams in the National League. The Cardinals fit in there somewhere.

 

Saturday musings

*Been away from the blog for a couple of days and it made me antsy. This blog is one of my favorite things. It might not be one of your favorite things, and I completely understand that.

* This is my third time spending some time in Salt Lake City and the place seems to get more beautiful every time I’m here. Why doesn’t everyone in the world live here? Outside of Mitt Romney, it’s a pretty special place. That’s a joke, folks. No letters please. Mitt’s fine.

* I’m here, obviously, covering Wichita State in the NCAA Tournament. So is my son, Jeff, who is doing sidebars and notes on the Shockers and their opponents. It’s special to cover the tournament with my kid, who (proud father alert) is good at this stuff. These are moments we’ll talk about, I’m sure, as he’s transporting me to a home in a few years.

* Jeff and I also are rooming together, which has given me an idea for a sitcom. It’s involves a 58-year-old veteran sportswriter living with his 30-year-old sportswriter son. I’m going to pitch it to the CW Network.

* Shockers vs. Zags. This is probably the most intriguing game I’ve covered in a while, what with Gonzaga being No. 1 and all. I haven’t seen the Shockers play a No. 1 team in 50 years. I know you’re going to want me to pick a winner in this game, and I will. But I’m going to save it for much later in the blog. Most of you, no doubt, will want me to pick Gonzaga since I picked Pittsburgh to upend Wichita State in the second round of the NCAA Tournament. We know how that went.

* There are a lot of keys to this game, obviously. But for me, the biggest centers around how Wichita State handles Gonzaga’s best player, 7-foot  junior center Kelly Olynyk. WSU coach Gregg Marshall called him a bigger, quicker version of Creighton’s Doug McDermott. That’s quite a compliment, isn’t it? He also said Olynyk lacks McDermott’s perimeter shooting skill.

* Olynyk does shoot almost 65 percent overall, even with his 9 of 27 three-point shooting. He and frontcourt mate Elias Harris have shot 342 free throws between them. The Gonzaga guards are good at getting the big guys the ball in advantageous situations.

* Olynyk will be a tough guard for the Shockers, as well as they guard. I don’t think Ehimen Orukpe has the feet to control him. Which means Carl Hall, who gives up four inches, might be the main guy. The Shockers have been torched this season by really good players. I bring you McDermott and Evansville’s Colt Ryan as examples. It will be interesting to see how they cope with Olynyk, who has a better supporting cast than Ryan, for sure, and McDermott.

* Kansas looked uninspired Friday night against Western Kentucky, which had a good game plan of slowing down the game, lengthening possessions and attack KU’s interior defense. Good plan, not always good execution. The Hilltoppers shot poorly inside and especially outside but still kept the game in doubt until the final minutes.

* Does Kansas beat North Carolina on Sunday at the Sprint Center? I think so. I think the Jayhawks have plenty of motivation in Self Vs. Williams III. Kansas will be inspired to remain unbeaten against its former coach. A win over the Tar Heels sets up a Sweet 16 match-up against Michigan at Jerry’s World in Arlington on Friday night. The Wolverines were lights out in drubbing a good VCU team Saturday morning to reach the Sweet 16. That Michigan team beats the Kansas team that showed up to play Western Kentucky by 20 points.

* Kansas State coach Bruce Weber caught a lot of flak for his handling of the final seconds of the Wildcats’ close second-round loss to La Salle on Friday. And rightly so, in my opinion. Weber should simply have called a time out with nine seconds left to set up some kind of play with the Wildcats down by two points. He didn’t and when he finally did try neither his team nor the officials saw him. It was too late and guard Angel Rodriguez was forced to take an impossible shot at the buzzer.

* I’m not sure how many fans Weber was able to win over during his first season in Manhattan, despite a co-Big 12 championship with Kansas and a 4-seed in the NCAA Tournament. Losing to a 13-seed is never a good thing, but La Salle, from the tough Atlantic-10, is better than a 4. Still, it was a bad loss, especially considering how poorly the Wildcats played in the first half.

* But K-State fans who are attacking Weber are being short-sighted. Give the man a chance. The book on Weber, of course, is that he can only win with the previous coach’s players. That’s based on his early success at Illinois after replacing Bill Self. Weber, though, was instrumental in Southern Illinois’ powerful Missouri Valley Conference run before he went to Illinois.

* I’m not saying Weber is the answer at Kansas State. I have my doubts, too. But it’s far too early to draw any conclusions. He needs time. We’ll start to see next season, when some of his recruits show up, where Weber has K-State basketball pointed.

* Wichita State guard Malcolm Armstead is playing so well. He’s the third junior college transfer to become the Shockers’ best player down the stretch after fellow point guards Clevin Hannah and Joe Ragland. OK, Armstead isn’t technically a junior college transfer. He came to WSU after a season at Oregon. Before that, though, he played for current Shocker assistant Greg Heier at Chipola (Fla.) Community College.

* Want a non-sports take? I knew you did. The Eagles, my guys, take to the road July 6 in Louisville to start their “History of the Eagles” tour. Can’t wait, can’t wait, can’t wait. This promises to be different than any Eagles tour ever and I’m guessing they invite original member Bernie Leadon to join in. They’ll perform songs they haven’t done in years. There’s so much about this upcoming tour that excites me. I just hope they come closer than Louisville. Intrust Bank Arena would be nice. And with Leadon and his country roots (the guy’s a mean banjo player) maybe there’s a chance.

* OK, I’ve put it off long enough. I’ve thought about this Gonzaga-Wichita State game, rolled it around in my brain up one side and down another. I do, after all, have a large brain. I expect Gonzaga to play more like a No. 1 team than the Zags did in barely surviving Southern on Thursday. I also expect Wichita State to do better than 2 of 20 from the three-point line, which was their performance from the arc against Pittsburgh. I wasn’t impressed with Pitt. That’s taking nothing away from Wichita State, which I expect to be in this game against Gonzaga. I just can’t pick the Shockers to win. Which means I’m left to pick Gonzaga, 70-66. I am sure you’ll let me know, again, if I get this one wrong. Have a great time watching.

 

The Valley, the Mountain West and WSU

Here’s what we know.Creighton is gone from the Missouri Valley Conference. Probably forever. My best to the Bluejays as they join the new Big East, a powerhouse basketball conference that will generate millions of dollars in television revenue.

Creighton had to take the leap, even if the Bluejays ultimately go splat on the pavement. Which could happen, unsavory as the depiction is.

Villanova University President Rev. Peter Donohue, far left, Seton Hall University President A. Gabriel Esteban, second from left, Georgetown University President John DeGioia, third from left, St. Johns University President Donald Harrington, fourth from left, Creighton University President Rev. Timothy Lannon, fifth from left, Depaul University President Dennis Holtschneider, fifth from right, Providence University President Rev. Brian Shanley, fourth from right, Xavier University President Michael Graham, third from right, Butler University President Jim Danko, second from right, and Marquette University President Rev. Scott Pilarz, far right, assemble for a photo following a press conference on Wednesday, March 20, 2013 in New York. Big East athletic conference member schools gathered in New York to announce developments helping to shape the new basketball-focused conference. (AP Photo/Bebeto Matthews) Close

So now what? Now what for Wichita State, which is left without its biggest rivalry and its basketball brother, really. Two teams in the Missouri Valley Conference rise among the rest – Wichita State and that other school that used to be in the Valley. Sorry, Creighton, you’re dead to me.

Bradley wants to get back to prominence, but Bradley has rarely been prominent over the past 15-20 years.

Southern Illinois might recapture some of its magic. Missouri State has been viable and could be again. Indiana State? Northern Iowa?

Creighton’s departure is a PR nightmare for the Valley, no matter how commissioner Doug Elgin tries to spin it. I’m as loyal to the Valley as anyone, but have felt for too many years the conference has been too passive about its future. And none of the potential choices to replace Creighton will come even close to replicating what Creighton has meant to the Valley over the years.

So, if I’m Wichita State president John Bardo or athletic director Eric Sexton, I’m checking my options. Even without football.

And I keep coming back to the Mountain West Conference, even after feeling earlier as if the notion of the Shockers in the MWC was a real stretch. Slowly, but surely, I’m coming around.

The Mountain West has been difficult to keep track of in the past couple of years. Boise State and San Diego State left for the Big East, then came crawling back after the Big East went wacko. But while Boise and San Diego were gone, the Mountain West plucked Utah State and San Jose State from the Western Athletic Conference.

So, as it stands now, the Mountain West is an 12-team football conference, with Hawaii. But for 2013-14, there are only 11 basketball members, without Hawaii.

Ask any conference commissioner what they hate and they’ll tell you it’s a nine- or 11-team league. It wreaks havoc with scheduling, which leads me to believe that MWC commissioner Craig Thompson, despite earlier assertions that further expansion isn’t on his table, would look at a basketball-only member to round out his conference.

Or maybe I’m completely crazy. That’s a possibility.

I am playing matchmaker here. But I’m not convinced either party is even looking at one another, let alone setting up a date.

And I do this with nothing against the Missouri Valley, which has served Wichita State well for nearly six decades. There’s tremendous history there.

I’m just not convinced other schools in the Valley are equipped to take the next step in basketball. Budget restrictions are a factor. I’m not sure how many MVC schools are serious about men’s basketball. And when I say “serious,” I’m talking about doing whatever is necessary to win, attract crowds and make it to the NCAA Tournament.

Creighton was one of those schools and it’s a big reason why the Bluejays are gone. Wichita State is definitely serious about hoops. After that it gets murky. Just check coaching salaries around the league. Check basketball budgets. Check non-conference schedules. Check all of the ways that tell you whether or not a school is doing everything it can to succeed.

The Mountain West has become one of the four best basketball conferences in the country. The Big East, Big 10 and ACC are probably better. With five teams in the NCAA Tournament, including two or three that could make a run, the MWC is feeling it. It’s a place to be and Wichita State should at least investigate trying to be there.

There are concerns. Travel is one; the MWC isn’t as easy to navigate. Would WSU fans be OK with later games in the Mountain and Pacific time zones? Wichita State would be the eastern outpost of this conference, by about 500 miles. So it’s a stretch.

But look around. Does geography really matter anymore? WSU’s athletic budget would have to increase, but added TV revenues would help.

I’ve gone so far as to draw up two six-team divisions for the new Mountain West. I’m a dreamer, but am I the only one?

West – San Jose State, Nevada, San Diego State, UNLV, Boise State, Fresno State.

East – Wyoming, Utah State, Colorado State, Air Force, New Mexico, Wichita State.

WSU would have to play three West road games a season. Traveling in the East would be a lot like traveling in the Missouri Valley, without Creighton.

So what am I missing other than any indication at all either side is taking a look at this?

I think it’s viable. I think it’s doable. With Creighton gone, WSU has to take a step back and look at possibilities.

I just spoke these words to my colleague, Paul Suellentrop: “I think this can work, but maybe I’m delusional.”

Maybe I am, but the more I think about this, the more I like it.

Memories of a sports writer

In 2002, I received one of the most exciting and daunting assignments of my newspaper life, to cover the 2002 Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City, where I am currently to cover the Wichita State basketball team in the NCAA Tournament.

As we were flying into Salt Lake last night, from Phoenix, I saw again the beauty of this city and area. And I remembered those nearly two weeks that I spent here 12 years ago.

I was never a big Winter Olympics guy. I went skiing once and mostly fell. I wouldn’t get in a bobsled if you gave me a million dollars and the notion of me on a pair of skates is at once hilarious and horrifying.

Two sports I enjoyed covering the most were hockey, because of the number of NHL players who were involved; and curling, because it’s a sport I could see myself attempting.

Covering the Olympics is unlike anything I’ve ever done in my career. I stayed in a Courtyard Marriott on the outskirts of Salt Lake City, but was rarely there. The shuttle picked us up at 6:30 or 7 and took us downtown to the media center, where we figured out what bus we needed to be on that particular day to cover the event we were interested in covering.

Often, the drives took an hour or more as the bus battled traffic and climbed mountains, literally, to get us to our venue.

After every event, there were interviews. Then the trip back to the media center. The time to write. It was usually 10 or after by the time I made it back to the hotel. And this went on for 12 days.

I had to dress in layers because of the frigid climate. I wore snow boots and a giant parka. I was completely out of my element, left to figure out things on my own. But it was such a new experience and such a great challenge that I adapted. And after a few days, I started to know my way around.

There was some figure-skating controversy (when isn’t there?) There was a great hockey tournament. There were people from so many places. The bus rides I took from the hotel to the media center, which lasted 20 minutes or so, were like a foreign language class in school.

I’ve provided a couple of columns I wrote about the Olympics below. One is a column about the prospect of attending, written before I left Wichita. The other is my accounting of curling, a sport I fell in love with. I’ll check back a bit later with another blog on the new Big East, which now officially includes Creighton. But I wanted to share my experience of 12 years ago.

 

HERE’S TO THE WINTER GAMES _ AND AN UNFROZEN LAPTOP
 

   My first reaction after being assigned to cover the Winter Olympics in Salt Lake City was to look for a blanket.
I’m not a big fan of winter. I was doing just fine with those 60- and 70-degree days in January, thank you.
Last week in the Wasatch Mountains surrounding Salt Lake, the high temperat ure was 20-below.
Hey, I believe in doing whatever it takes to bring the story to readers. But 20-below tests my limits.
The second thing I did upon getting this assignment was to search for how many Kansans will be participating in the Games.
Then I remembered: we don’t have much snow in Kansas and we sure as heck don’t have mountains. These Olympics will be as Kansan-less as an anti-wheat rally.
Recently, though, my excitement about going to the Olympics has started to spike, even though there is a poll that indicates one-third of Americans believe there will some kind of terrorist attack in Salt Lake.
Security for these Games is at an all-time high. People have told me to expect to wait two or three hours while getting my credentials upon arriving in Salt Lake.
Fine. Take as long as you want. Just keep everyone safe.
It has been fun to try and map out a schedule of the events I want to cover, realizing all the while that wrenches are likely to be thrown into my plans.
I can’t wait to see the first American receive a gold medal and witness the emotion that follows.
I’m looking forward to standing at the bottom of the Grizzly course at Snowbasin Ski Area and watching the finishes of the men’s and women’s downhill races.
In some strange way, I’m curious about the sports of skeleton and curling.
Curling sounds a lot like shuffleboard. One of the U.S. curlers, Myles Brundidge, is 41 and weighs 230 pounds. Now that’s my kind of Olympian.
Another, Joni Cotten from Mt. Prospect, Ill., is 48. But she’s only an alternate.
It bothers me that professional athletes are now sent to represent their countries in the Olympics. The novelty of the Dream Team in men’s basketball wore off after one gold medal.
And with professionals now on the ice in hockey, there will never be a repeat of the greatest moment in Olympic history – the U.S. men, a team of amateurs, defeating the heavily favored Soviet Union en route to the gold medal at the 1980 Games in Lake Placid, N.Y.
But I have to admit, watching the fight for a gold medal in men’s hockey, a fight that will include all of the great players in the NHL in the uniforms of their countries, will be fascinating.
Canada is favored to win the gold. But Canada, with a roster that includes Mario Lemieux, Eric Lindros and the NHL’s top scorer, Jarome Iginla, hasn’t won a gold since 1952.
Then again, the Canadians have never had a roster that looks like this.
I am thankful that I only have to write the names of some of the particip ants in the Winter Olympics and not pronounce them.
Even writing them, however, is a challenge.
There is speed skater Jochem Uytdehaage of Netherlands, cross-country skiers Katerina Neumannova from the Czech Republic and Julija Tchepalova from Russia, and biathletes Liv Grete Skjelbreid-Poiree and Gunn Margit Andreassen from Norway.
It would be a kick just watching them check into a hotel.
This will be the third Winter Olympics held on American soil. American patriotism, at an all-time high after Sept. 11, will be one of the major stories of the Games.
The U.S. never does that well in the Winter Olympics. Four years ago at Nagano, Japan, American athletes combined for 13 medals, fewer than Germany, Norway, Russia, Austria and Canada.
The U.S. Olympic Committee is projecting a 20-medal haul for the United States this time around.
That would mean a lot of red, white and blue.

CURLING SLIDES INTO OLYMPIC SPOTLIGHT

   OGDEN, Utah
OK, I want to curl. I want to get out there on the ice, with a broom and slick shoes, and slide stones.
I have been looking for a hobby, and curling has been looking for me.
Just one problem: There isn’t a curling rink within a two-day drive of where I live. For some reason, curlinghasn’t caught on in most parts of the United States – one of the only things that doesn’t make me proud to be an American. But if you’ve been watching the Olympic competition, you know what I’m feeling.
Don’t you?
I gotta curl, you gotta curl, all God’s children gotta curl.
“It’s so much fun,” said Olympian Kari Erickson, the skip of the U.S. women’s team. “Otherwise, I wouldn’t be doing it.”
Erickson, who said her team played poorly during a 9-4 loss to Denmark on Thursday morning, was a track athlete in middle school and a swimmer in high school.
Her parents introduced her to curling, and it was love at first sight. She has been curling 42-pound stones now for 14 years.
There are people who scoff at curling, especially as an Olympic sport. After trial runs in Calgary (1988) and Albertville (1992), curling became a medal sport in Nagano four years ago.
I have heard people say curling belongs in a bar with three or four pitchers of beer. I have heard people wonder how curling can be an Olympic sport when many of its competitors wear short-sleeved shirts. I have heard people utter these words: curling is for sissies.
Oh yeah?
Just Wednesday, American men’s skip Tim Somerville refused to talk to the media after botching a shot during his team’s loss to Germany.
That is the most encouraging sign yet that curling has arrived as a legitimate force in the United States. I mean, there are dozens of athletes in football, basketball and baseball who regularly refuse to talk to the media. Now a curler has joined that elite club.
Unlike Somerville, most curlers are eager to get the word out about their sport. And they are encouraged by the mostly positive reviews they are getting during the Olympics.
“This is wonderful,” Erickson said. “We have gotten so much coverage here and everybody is talking about us. That hasn’t happened much for us in the past.”
It’s not easy to find a curling hotbed in the United States. Erickson said most of the rinks are in Minnesota and Wisconsin, and even then many of them are make-shift, formed on hockey rinks.
“I’m lucky, there is a curling rink where I’m from in Bemidji, Minn.,” Erickson said.
Just to the north in Canada, almost every town – even the smallest – have curling rinks, Erickson said. That helps explain why Canada has been so dominant in the sport. Four years ago, the Canadian men won the silver medal, behind Sweden’s gold, while the Canadian women won the gold.
Curling - think of horseshoe pitching, shuffleboard and sweeping out your closet all thrown together – was introduced in Scotland. There is even an early Scottish poem about curling, an excerpt from which is:”No party politics around our Tee,
For Whig and Tory on the ice agree;
Glory we play for, may it be our lot,
To gain the Bonspiel (curling tournament) by a single shot.”

Makes you choke up, doesn’t it?
But curling is still the poor stepsister of the Olympics. They’re holding the tournament in Ogden, 37 miles north of Salt Lake City. And it’s not easy to keep track of what’s going on – each of the 10 men’s and women’s teams plays a round-robin tournament to determine which four teams reach the medal round.
The International Olympic Committee seems to be doing its best to hide curling under the radar of the Olympics, but the sport is making such a clatter.
People who just a week ago didn’t know curling existed are talking about it in glowing terms. In the Knight Ridder bureau, from which I do most of my work, the television is most often turned to curling.
Not skiing, snowboarding, skating or hockey.
Curling.
“I know there are so many other things for kids to do in this country,” Erickson said. “They have so much to choose from and there just isn’t much free time.”
But wouldn’t it be great, she said, if the Olympics provided a kick-start for her sport? How amazing would it be if there was a groundswell of enthusia sm for curling?
People coming out of the woodwork, demanding the construction of curling rinks? People throwing away their footballs and basketballs and buying brooms and stones?
John Madden analyzing curling? A curling World Series?
Do you feel what I feel?