Category Archives: Lawsuits

Two former Scotch & Sirloin managers file lawsuit claiming they were fired after refusing to lie for the company

WICHITA — Two more former Scotch & Sirloin employees have filed a lawsuit against Scotch Investment Corp.

Former managers Saprina Almosrati and Lindsey Moate filed a federal lawsuit last week over their dismissal from the restaurant for what they say are issues related to past lawsuits waitresses have filed against the company.

Almosrati and Moate claim they were fired for their unwillingness to lie or falsify documents related to those lawsuits.

In recent years, two former waitresses sued the company claiming they were fired or reassigned jobs after becoming pregnant.

A third employee filed a lawsuit after claiming she was fired for reporting the issue over the pregnancies to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.

Part of that lawsuit included a claim that the Scotch has wage payment practices that are in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.

The claim that money had been illegally deducted from waitresses’ pay for cooks and advertising became certified as a collective action.

Each of the discrimination cases was settled and the company has paid the wage claims.

Randy Rathbun, the attorney who filed the lawsuits on behalf of those clients, also is representing Almosrati and Moate in their suit against Scotch Investment.

“We’ve got a situation where they tried to cover up wrongdoing with lies,” Rathbun says. “If they would have been honest from the start and not tried to get people to lie about it . . . it would have been much less of a problem to them than it is now.”

General manager Sonny Glennon says what Almosrati and Moate are claiming is wrong.

“I really don’t think I’ve done anything,” he said. “I didn’t do anything except do what I had to do to run a business, and unfortunately, I’m going to have to listen to what other people have to say.”

Read More »

Developer Casey Bachrodt faces lawsuit on Waterfront property

WICHITA — Simmons First National Bank has filed a lawsuit against developer Casey Bachrodt to foreclose on property he owns at the Waterfront.

“Well, it will not get to that stage, I will promise you that,” Bachrodt says.

The suit, filed this week in Sedgwick County District Court, also names Waterfront Office Park Development LLC, Bric Waterfront LLC and Andover State Bank.

Bachrodt has eight buildings in his Executive at the Waterfront within the Waterfront development at 13th and Webb Road.

He says the lawsuit is related to a few acres next to those buildings.

“We’re just taking care of a different type of financing on the property,” Bachrodt says.

He doesn’t want to go into details.

“It’s just not worth discussing at this time,” he says. “We’re getting it resolved.”

Bachrodt says he still plans to build on the property in the future.

“Yes, definitely.”

Real Development Corp. faces $28,000 judgment and lets corporate charter lapse

WICHITA — There’s a judgment in Sedgwick County District Court against Real Development Corp. for more than $28,000 the company owes Tax Adjustment Specialists.

As Have You Heard? reported earlier this year, Tax Adjustment Specialists helped Real Development save about $61,000 by appealing to the county to lower appraisals on a few of its downtown buildings.

“I have spoken to them, and we have a payment plan,” says Real Development’s Michael Elzufon.

“I wish to God that were true,” says Jim McIntyre, the lawyer for Tax Adjustment Specialists.

“We had a deal,” McIntyre says. “They didn’t keep their word — again.”

In the process of preparing the lawsuit, McIntyre discovered Elzufon and partner Dave Lundberg let their corporate charters for several entities — including Real Development — expire.

The Real Development charter in Minnesota, where Elzufon and Lundberg are based, has not lapsed.

McIntyre says Kansas charters cost between $25 and $2,000 to maintain depending on the amount of real estate someone has.

Elzufon says the filing lapses are news to him.

Read More »

Kansas Court of Tax Appeals substantially raises fees for commercial property owners wanting to appeal property tax valuations

UPDATED — Commercial property owners who want to appeal their property tax valuations now have something else to complain about.

The Kansas Court of Tax Appeals in Topeka today voted to change the filing fees for those appeals after the Legislature slashed its funding earlier this summer.

“We now have the highest filing fees in the nation for commercial tax appeals,” said lawyer Jim McIntyre.

Fees have doubled, tripled or gone even higher. McIntyre said a lot depends on the number of parcels within a property and what county it is in.

What used to cost, say, $125 to appeal now might cost $1,600 due to the number of parcels, he said.

“It’s going to be a mess.”

He plans to file a lawsuit against the state this week to stop the fees from taking effect.

“A lot of people have a lot of money at stake here,” McIntyre said.

According to Sedgwick County, there were 3,618 appeals of commercial property taxes in 2010.

Since January, there have been 522, all of which required fees.

Until a few years ago, the entire budget for the Court of Tax Appeals came from the state’s general revenue fund and property owners didn’t have to pay to contest their valuations.

In recent years, the majority of the budget still came from the state, and commercial property owners made up most of the rest with filing fees.

Now, commercial property owners will fund about two-thirds of the court’s budget.

“What it does, it restricts access to the courts,” said Jim Hudson, co-owner of Tax Adjustment Specialists, which is one of several Wichita-area companies that help commercial and some residential property owners appeal their taxes.

For small tax issues, he said, the increased fees will mean “it’s just no longer feasible to take those cases.”

Hudson said $25 is about the most commercial property owners have to pay in other states in this area.

“In fact, most of the surrounding states don’t charge anything to file,” he said.

All Kansas property owners — residential and commercial — can make an informal appeal to their county appraiser’s office through a hearing for no fee.

The next level is a small claims division of the Court of Tax Appeals that’s generally used for residential property appeals.

The highest level for appeals is to the judges with the Court of Tax Appeals.

Residential property owners generally don’t have to pay anything to appeal their property taxes unless they take it to the highest level of the court, which isn’t as common as taking it to the small claims division.

That’s part of why McIntyre is filing the suit.

“They’re treating commercial taxpayers worse than residential taxpayers — far worse,” McIntyre said.

He said the suit will allege denial of federal constitutional rights of due process and equal protection.

He said the new fees also violate the state Constitution’s classification scheme in which commercial properties are taxed at 25 percent of their fair market value and residential properties are taxed at 11.5 percent.

“In my opinion, that classification requires that residential . . . homeowners pay based on a proportion of use,” McIntyre says. “That prohibits the Legislature from setting the filing fee at zero.”

McIntyre says that companies asking for industrial revenue bonds or that groups, such as churches, asking for tax exemptions also will have to pay significantly more.

McIntyre says he’ll name Gov. Sam Brownback in the suit.

“Brownback says he’s a big supporter of business, yet the people being gouged here are businesses,” McIntyre said. “The bigger the commercial taxpayer, the more they’re getting gouged.”

Read More »

Massage Junkie owners face lawsuit; former customers have outlet for gift certificates and packages

WICHITA — When Massage Junkie co-owner Heather McKendry changed store sites earlier this year, she didn’t return inquiries to discuss it.

Nor is she talking now that her store is closed and she is facing a lawsuit from her former landlord at Douglas and Rock Road.

A number of past Massage Junkie customers are wondering what happened and whether they can be reimbursed for gift certificates and packages they purchased.

“We’re chasing them just like everybody else,” says Jim McIntyre, the lawyer for Jehan Family Investments, which leased space to Massage Junkie at the family’s center on the northeast corner of Douglas and Rock Road.

“They just packed their bags in February and moved out of my clients’ . . . retail space,” McIntyre says.

The group filed a lawsuit for $29,000, which includes $21,000 for what the suit says is unpaid rent and $8,000 for reduced rent through the end of the lease in October 2012.

Smoothie King is now in that space at a reduced rent, which is why the landlord is willing to deduct from the full amount of the Massage Junkie lease, McIntyre says.

Massage Junkie briefly moved to 9390 E. Central earlier this year and opened for only a brief time before closing without notice.

“They’ve abandoned that location owing rent there,” McIntyre says.

He says that business was conducted under the name Massage Junkies.

“They set up two companies with one letter difference between them to confuse their creditors,” McIntyre says.

“I, quite frankly, don’t expect a good resolution on this one.”

There is, though, a resolution for Massage Junkie customers who still have gift certificates and packages that they purchased.

Read More »

IMA Financial Group sues former president of its Kansas City and Topeka offices and Lockton Inc. over breach of contract

WICHITA — IMA Financial Group has filed a lawsuit in Sedgwick County District Court against Douglas Anderson, former president of IMA’s Kansas City and Topeka offices, and his new company, Lockton Inc.

Anderson didn’t return a call for comment, but the lawsuit states he worked for Lockton years ago then went to another company and then to IMA in late 2006.

According to the lawsuit, in late 2009, Anderson signed a confidentiality agreement that included a two-year nonsolicitation clause.

“About one year after entering into the Agreement, Anderson began to orchestrate a scheme to resign from IMA, join Lockton, and solicit IMA’s clients to Lockton,” the suit says.

The suit further says that since Anderson left in January, at least two IMA clients canceled relationships with the company to follow Anderson to Lockton.

Earlier this month, Have You Heard? reported that the International Pizza Hut Franchise Holders Association is ending its 18-year relationship with IMA.

It’s not clear if that is one of the relationships the suit refers to.

Read More »

Scotch & Sirloin settles one lawsuit with former waitresses

WICHITA — Scotch & Sirloin’s parent company has settled part of its lawsuit with former and current waitresses at the restaurant.

In 2009, Former Scotch & Sirloin waitress Christina Nuss filed a discrimination lawsuit in federal court against Scotch Investment Corp.

Part of the suit said the Scotch has wage payment practices that are in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Nuss said money was illegally deducted from waitresses’ pay for cooks, dishwashers and advertising.

That portion of the lawsuit was certified as a collective action. Current or former waitresses (dating back to March 17, 2007) could opt into the wage claim.

That’s the part of the suit that’s been settled.

A gag order prevents either side from talking. According to court documents, though, 20 waitresses are included in the settlement, and they are to receive twice the amount of tips they contended were wrongfully withheld along with attorney fees.

Read More »

Jamie Coulter sues Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon

WICHITA — Former Lone Star Steakhouse & Saloon CEO Jamie Coulter and his wife, Kimberly, have filed a lawsuit against the company and its related corporations along with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas in an effort to keep insurance coverage for their family.

Larry Reynolds, whom the suit refers to as having been “a valued provider of professional services to Lone Star,” and his wife, Susan, also are plaintiffs.

According to the lawsuit, here’s what’s at issue:

In 2001, Lone Star’s board passed a resolution to provide lifetime medical, prescription, health, dental, life and AD&D insurance for Coulter and his spouse and dependent children at levels comparable to what they’d been receiving along with reimbursements for deductibles and out-of-pocket expenses for noninsured medical costs.

The suit says Lone Star also contracted to provide lifetime health insurance coverage for the Reynolds family.

Last year, Coulter was notified his benefits would end Dec. 31, 2010.

Read More »

Landlords file temporary injunction against Johnny Carino’s owner

WICHITA — The owners of the building where Johnny Carino’s closed last week have filed a motion for temporary injunction to prevent the former tenant, Kampco Bevco, from taking anything else from the building near K-96 and Webb.

“They got two rental trucks and spent two days loading them,” says Daryl Crotts, property manager for the group of 11 owners who do business as Sun Toben.

Crotts says representatives of Kampco took stoves, booths, tables, appliances and “anything that they could easily just disconnect.”

“They told me they weren’t going to close till the end of the month,” Crotts says. “I think they were guilty of . . . a little deception.”

He says he thinks they were trying to “give themselves an opportunity to remove a lot of the fixtures and assets of the building prior to our being able to take any action.”

Randy Kamp, operating manager of the now-defunct Kampco, says that’s not true.

“I told him I didn’t know the exact date, but it was imminent,” Kamp says.

“The equipment is collateralized for bank loans,” he says. “We’re paying the bank for the loans.”

A hearing for the injunction is set for Friday.

Crotts says there were several years remaining on Kampco’s lease.

“We’ve been working with them for some time,” he says. “We’ve deferred a number of their obligations.”

He says the “owners purchased a sign for them since they couldn’t afford it and didn’t want to commit” to it.

“Which coincidentally and ironically was installed last Friday,” Crotts says.

He says he had to wait on the new, nearby Menards before the sign was installed. It now advertises Menards and is blank where the Carino’s name was supposed to be.

Read More »

Twin Peaks sues rival Northern Exposure

There’s generally not much fun with a lawsuit, but the online Inside Counsel recently tried to have a little at the expense of Hooters take-off Twin Peaks, a restaurant chain that will be opening on Rock Road this spring.

“Two wrongs may not make a right, but two bad puns can make a lawsuit,” the magazine writes.

“Texas-based Twin Peaks restaurant is suing Arkansas-based Northern Exposure for trademark infringement. Both eateries specialize in ‘scenic views’ and turning TV show names into double-entendre. Twin Peaks accuses Northern Exposure of infringing on its snowcapped mountain logo and slogan.”