<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Grammar Monkeys</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar</link>
	<description>A language podcast from our copy desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:04:15 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Is that really necessary? by Carolyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/10/26/is-that-really-necessary/comment-page-1/#comment-252</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 00:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=405#comment-252</guid>
		<description>Re:  THAT

I received a fund-raising request from a SCHOOL here in Texas.  The wording on the flyer:

&quot;These materials have been sent to you by a student THAT is asking for your help.&quot;

Might we assume THAT the funds are not being spent to educate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re:  THAT</p>
<p>I received a fund-raising request from a SCHOOL here in Texas.  The wording on the flyer:</p>
<p>&#8220;These materials have been sent to you by a student THAT is asking for your help.&#8221;</p>
<p>Might we assume THAT the funds are not being spent to educate?
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=252">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Punctuation Day by Celia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/09/24/national-punctuation-day/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Celia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 18:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=346#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Punctuation day blog featuring the interrobang: http://www.bsatworld.com/blogPost/31/National-Punctuation-Day</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Punctuation day blog featuring the interrobang: <a href="http://www.bsatworld.com/blogPost/31/National-Punctuation-Day" rel="nofollow">http://www.bsatworld.com/blogPost/31/National-Punctuation-Day</a>
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=234">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on National Punctuation Day by been_around_the_block</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/09/24/national-punctuation-day/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>been_around_the_block</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=346#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Cheers to the panda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers to the panda.
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=233">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Interrobang: Two-for-one punctuation by Rosewood</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/09/21/interrobang/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosewood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=355#comment-232</guid>
		<description>It is a shame that the Irony Mark never gained popular usage. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a shame that the Irony Mark never gained popular usage. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irony_mark</a>
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=232">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Do you feel badly? by cranky copy editor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/09/07/do-you-feel-badly/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>cranky copy editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=324#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Thanks! I hate the misuse of this word!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks! I hate the misuse of this word!
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=228">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ‘None is’ or ‘none are’? by John McIntyre</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/08/24/none-is-or-none-are/comment-page-1/#comment-212</link>
		<dc:creator>John McIntyre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:39:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=309#comment-212</guid>
		<description>Either, depending on context, is acceptable. The etymology of the word, along with the usage of more than five centuries, supports the senses of &quot;not one&quot; (singular) and &quot;not any&quot; (plural). On this descriptivists and informed prescriptivists agree, and bad teaching and bad advice are the only reasons that the superstition that &quot;none&quot; can be used only with a singular verb has survived.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Either, depending on context, is acceptable. The etymology of the word, along with the usage of more than five centuries, supports the senses of &#8220;not one&#8221; (singular) and &#8220;not any&#8221; (plural). On this descriptivists and informed prescriptivists agree, and bad teaching and bad advice are the only reasons that the superstition that &#8220;none&#8221; can be used only with a singular verb has survived.
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=212">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ‘Which’ or ‘that’? by Adrienne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/07/20/which-or-that/comment-page-1/#comment-182</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrienne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=275#comment-182</guid>
		<description>Wow, this is so helpful and straight to the point. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, this is so helpful and straight to the point. Thanks!
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=182">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Favorite Books: Garner’s by Lisa McLendon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/06/11/our-favorite-books-garner%e2%80%99s/comment-page-1/#comment-174</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa McLendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 00:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=225#comment-174</guid>
		<description>Yes, we&#039;re excited about that too. Really excited. (Two of the Eagle&#039;s copy editors were asked to serve on the panel of critical readers for this edition.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, we&#8217;re excited about that too. Really excited. (Two of the Eagle&#8217;s copy editors were asked to serve on the panel of critical readers for this edition.)
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=174">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Our Favorite Books: Garner’s by rpmason</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/06/11/our-favorite-books-garner%e2%80%99s/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>rpmason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=225#comment-170</guid>
		<description>The Third Edition of GMAU is coming out at the end of August. Mine&#039;s on order.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Third Edition of GMAU is coming out at the end of August. Mine&#8217;s on order.
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=170">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Double negatives are a no-no by Lisa McLendon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/2009/06/29/double-negatives-are-a-no-no/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa McLendon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 01:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/?p=257#comment-168</guid>
		<description>&quot;Ain&#039;t&quot; started as a contraction of &quot;am not&quot; and &quot;are not&quot; (and as such was proper grammar), and so it has always had the apostrophe. The usage has been around for centuries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ain&#8217;t&#8221; started as a contraction of &#8220;am not&#8221; and &#8220;are not&#8221; (and as such was proper grammar), and so it has always had the apostrophe. The usage has been around for centuries.
<p align="right"><a href="http://blogs.kansas.com/grammar/wp-content/plugins/dd-report-comments/report.php?c=168">(Report comment)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
