Comments on: Wedding dresses and diapers would be tax exempt under bill http://blogs.kansas.com/gov/2009/03/04/wedding-dresses-and-diapers-would-be-tax-exempt-under-bill/ Insider dispatches from our writers on politics in Wichita, Topeka and Washington Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:49:17 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2 hourly 1 By: brian_nuevo http://blogs.kansas.com/gov/2009/03/04/wedding-dresses-and-diapers-would-be-tax-exempt-under-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-944 brian_nuevo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 23:18:46 +0000 http://blogs.kansas.com/gov/?p=842#comment-944 <p>"shortcutlc Posted March 4, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink Wedding dresses are luxury items and should not be exempt."</p> <p>A wedding dress that costs $300 or less is <i>not</I> a luxury item. </p> <p>That being said, is it even possible to get a wedding dress less than $300 now?</p> “shortcutlc Posted March 4, 2009 at 3:27 pm | Permalink Wedding dresses are luxury items and should not be exempt.”

A wedding dress that costs $300 or less is not a luxury item.

That being said, is it even possible to get a wedding dress less than $300 now?

]]> By: shortcutlc http://blogs.kansas.com/gov/2009/03/04/wedding-dresses-and-diapers-would-be-tax-exempt-under-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-943 shortcutlc Wed, 04 Mar 2009 21:27:03 +0000 http://blogs.kansas.com/gov/?p=842#comment-943 <p>Wedding dresses are luxury items and should not be exempt. Baby diapers are our biggest landfill problem and they should have an additonal tax put on them instead of a tax break.</p> Wedding dresses are luxury items and should not be exempt. Baby diapers are our biggest landfill problem and they should have an additonal tax put on them instead of a tax break.

]]>