Category Archives: Kansas.com

PDFs of printed section fronts

Robert emailed over the weekend to say thanks for adding PDFs to Kansas.com of section fronts from the printed paper. You’re welcome, Robert, we’re happy to be able to add this service for Web site users. He wonders if we could add in the Business page from the daily paper.

We’re looking at options for doing that. The process of uploading the PDFs is automated and is based on a program that knows that those pages have the same page number every day. That might be a hitch with the Business page, since it runs inside the Local & State section, which can vary in size. We’ll try to make it work. Stay tuned.

Reader feedback: Direct email vs. posted comments

Alan, I’ve never done a formal count of phone calls/emails I get compared to comments posted on the board. A rough guess is that at least 90% to 95% come to me directly. Increasingly, those people explain that they didn’t want to post publicly. Also, I often address questions here that I get in person at community events.

I understand their point and yours about subjecting yourself to abuse by rude posters. On the other hand, when you post publicly, everyone gets the benefit of reading all of your comments. I suppose it’s a plus that more people use their real name when they email or call, and they probably wouldn’t in a posted comment. So in that regard, it’s a more personal connection for me to get direct contact vs. a post.

But posted comments allow for a multi-directional conversation. If you do post, and you feel like someone attacks you personally, flag that post and we’ll review it.

Where are the Editor’s Desk bloggers?

Ellie asks a pointed question, and she’s right. Our posting is spotty on this blog, and we need to do better. She says she clicked on the About link, and has “never seen a peep from those peeps.” Her chastising is on point and we’re without a good defense. We need to do better.

When I make time to post here, I get (mostly) great feedback from readers and I love the two-way conversation. The other newsroom editors also need to get in the habit of making time to post - we all do, and Sports Editor Kirk Seminoff brought this up recently. So you’re right, and I’ll take your challenge to crack the proverbial whip. And yes, I’ll also gig Jean to post a “real bio.”

What happens when reader comments get flagged?

A couple readers have asked me if an actual human being sees user comments that are flagged for questionable content, or whether those posted comments are weeded out through automated filters.

Those comments do get reviewed by a real person, who decides whether they get deleted (if already posted) or they are allowed to post (if they’re on hold before posting).

Reader comment boards on Kansas.com are not routinely reviewed by our online staff. A couple of situations can cause a comment to be flagged for review. First, if a site user finds a posted comment offensive, he or she can report it as a violation under our terms of service. One of our staff members will review comments flagged as violations and determine whether they indeed are.

Another possibility is that a comment contains a questionable word and gets caught in a filter before it posts. Those comments are held for review before they post, and again, they’re reviewed by a real person.

Sometimes the review process happens immediately. If a comment is held up in the filter while the online staff is out of the office, say, at lunch, or in a meeting, it may be withheld for an hour or so awaiting review. In the overnight hours or on weekends, the delay might be longer.

We occasionally hear from site users angry at the “censorship” of their comments. We want robust and lively discussion on our comment boards, but when users flag offensive or abusive comments, we remove them. We’re first in line among advocates of free speech. But we also expect site users to respect the responsibility that comes with it.

The newsroom’s goals for 2008

I realized today that I haven’t shared the newsroom’s goals for the year with readers. In The Eagle’s newsroom, we have four overriding priorities for the year, and every department (metro news, business, sports, etc.) writes measurable goals that support these priorities:

1. Developing a harder-news edge to the front page, with dominant stories that are based on breaking news or investigative reports versus “softer” feature stories. And making sure all elements of a page - the articles, design, photography and headlines - work together so story packages are clear, compelling, accurate and balanced.

2. Reporting more “enterprise” and investigative news. Enterprise stories are those that aren’t readily available in a press release or on a meeting agenda. Our aim is to seek out the less-obvious stories - those now going unreported - and to improve our editing and reporting so all important questions are always answered in a story. A key part of this goal is reviewing and analyzing more public databases, and ensuring that government operates in the open.

3. Building huge audience growth for our Web site, Kansas.com. We’re aiming for at least a 20% increase in monthly unique visitors, through increased news, information, tools and features for Web users - and also through better innovation, and more individual responsibility throughout the newsroom.

4. Focus on individual growth and learning. Every staffer will log 30 hours of training time through in-house seminars and other training opportunities.

Sign-in is back on

We’ve resolved the bugs with user sign-in for our blogs. It’s back on here. It will begin rolling out to our other blogs this afternoon and tomorrow.

No sign-in just yet

UPDATE: You’ll see the sign-in links at bottom come and go as we use this blog to test our changes to the sign-in system. Thanks for your patience.

We’ve discovered a bug in the sign-in system we’re planning to deploy on all our blogs. We had been testing it on this blog, but we’ve now taken it down. We’ll keep you posted.

Soon, blog commenters will need to log in

About two months ago, we began requiring Kansas.com users to log in to post comments on our stories on the main site. While that decreased our comment traffic substantially, it also slowed to a trickle the complaints we receive about the comments, and the tone of our comment boards has improved markedly. We’re glad we did it.

Because blogs like this one are hosted on a separate platform, it has taken us a little longer to bring that same log-in requirement to the comments here. But we’ve finally figured it out. We’re testing the log-in functionality on this blog’s comments first. As the week progresses, we’ll turn on the sign-in system for our other blogs, including our most popular one, WE Blog.

The sign-in system is the same one on our main site. Most users won’t be asked to sign in, and you’ll be able to read the blogs and the comments as always. Like the main site, if you view a substantial number of pages — about 44 over four days right now — you’ll be asked to sign in as a Kansas.com member, or to register if you haven’t already. If you wish to make a comment on one of the blogs, you will have to be a Kansas.com member, and you’ll have to be signed in.

If you have any trouble, please let us know as soon as possible.

A few thoughts on Kansas.com registration

It’s been nearly two months since we launched registration for Kansas.com users and for the most part, it’s gone very smoothly. When I last checked in with our senior editor/interactive, Nick Jungman, a few days ago, we had about 9,700 registered users, growing by about 150 per day. We don’t ask users to register unless they hit a threshold of visiting about 40 pages over a few days.

One of the best user benefits of registration is access to some very useful e-mail alerts we send daily, including morning and afternoon headlines. The information you give us helps us learn more about who uses our Web site so we can improve it, and it helps our advertisers understand the audiences they’re trying to reach. We don’t ask for extensive personal information — as Nick pointed out to one Web user, the registration form we use does not gather enough information from you to allow us to mail you a postcard.

Most online users register when asked and move on. Some, though, have been downright angry. I got one email from a reader who was irate at the idea that we’d ask him to register to access our site, and he also found the advertising on the site irritating.

With Kansas.com, we offer readers, for free, a service that is very expensive to provide — round-the-clock news. In addition, the Web gives us the opportunity to offer far more news content than the printed paper (especially multimedia such as photos and video), discussion boards and interactive conversation on ever-increasing levels, and rapidly growing opportunities for advertisers to reach the exact people they want to reach with their messages, and in unique ways.

It’s a phenomenal public square for news users, communities, journalists and advertisers.

The reason we can make this available at no cost to users is because advertisers support the Web site and printed paper.

I’m often asked whether I believe that one day people will have to pay to access news Web sites. I just don’t see it happening. The business model is still evolving, but I believe the advertising will have to pay for free access to news. Users expect it.

In the morning, I still want to hold the paper in my hands, drink coffee, and read the news. Millions of readers feel the same way. Many others don’t, and a computer screen is preferable to them.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask users to give us a half-dozen or so pieces of demographic information to access that free news. Our aim is to improve our Web site constantly, both in content and experience, and your feedback — including the information you give us by registering — helps us do that.
I doubt Westar is going to give me my electricity for free, or Cox is going to decide to quit billing me for my Internet service. You, either. But we can provide news for free on the Web. Taking two or three minutes to register seems like a sweet deal to me.

You’ll have to log in to comment

Speech bubbleBeginning Friday, Feb. 1, we’ll require users of Kansas.com to log in to the site to make a comment on a story.

This has long been suggested by our users as a way to limit the number of profane, violent and generally irresponsible comments made on our comment boards. And for almost just as long, it has been our goal to institute such a system. Now that site registration has debuted on Kansas.com and several thousand of you have registered, it is possible for us to do this.

If you are not logged in, you’ll be able to read the story comments; you just won’t be able to make one. Once you are logged in, your Kansas.com username will be automatically signed to any comment you make. For now, this only applies to comments on stories on our main www.kansas.com site. We plan to have a similar system in place for our blogs, on blogs.kansas.com, within a couple of weeks. Our discussion forums, which have always required a separate log-in, are not changing.

If you’re not already registered as a Kansas.com user, now is a great time to do that. Start at http://www.kansas.com/register/.