Monthly Archives: February 2008

January’s winning headlines

January’s winning headlines

The voting for the first monthly headline contest of 2008 is done. Here are the winners.

First place was written by copy editor Julie Mah.

Texas has carbon
footprint the size of . . .

That headline appeared with a story about the Lone Star state producing more greenhouse gases than California and Pennsylvania — the second- and third-ranking states — combined.

Second place went to senior editor Michael Roehrman:

Chalk and awe

That one was above a story about a fourth-grade class at Gammon Elementary being excited to meet their pen pal, a soldier who recently returned from his second tour in Iraq.

Third place also went to Roehrman.

Heaping whelping

This was with a story about the Kansas Humane Society having so many puppies that they were offering them for half price.

See an Eagle headline you like or think is noteworthy? Drop me a line.

Missing comics page

Some readers found that a page of their comics — and puzzles — were missing in Tuesday’s WichiTalk section.

These readers depend on solving their puzzles each day and on finding content in the paper where they expect it: in the right place.

We know the value of that, and we work hard to get things right every day.

So what went wrong?

WichiTalk editor Lori Buselt explains:

“Worried readers can rest assured that we’re not getting rid of the popular crossword, Cryptoquip, Jumble and Sukoku puzzles.

“Because of a production error, some editions of Tuesday’s WichiTalk did not include those features, as well as some comics. We apologize for the error and will provide those features on Page 7 in Wednesday’s WichiTalk. (You can find Wednesday’s installment of those features in their usual place, on Page 11, on Wednesday, as well.)”

We realize how important each section of The Eagle is to our readers. Our commitment is to have the features you want available to you each day.

And when errors occur such as this one, it only renews our determination to get it right.

– Arlice

A few thoughts on Kansas.com registration

It’s been nearly two months since we launched registration for Kansas.com users and for the most part, it’s gone very smoothly. When I last checked in with our senior editor/interactive, Nick Jungman, a few days ago, we had about 9,700 registered users, growing by about 150 per day. We don’t ask users to register unless they hit a threshold of visiting about 40 pages over a few days.

One of the best user benefits of registration is access to some very useful e-mail alerts we send daily, including morning and afternoon headlines. The information you give us helps us learn more about who uses our Web site so we can improve it, and it helps our advertisers understand the audiences they’re trying to reach. We don’t ask for extensive personal information — as Nick pointed out to one Web user, the registration form we use does not gather enough information from you to allow us to mail you a postcard.

Most online users register when asked and move on. Some, though, have been downright angry. I got one email from a reader who was irate at the idea that we’d ask him to register to access our site, and he also found the advertising on the site irritating.

With Kansas.com, we offer readers, for free, a service that is very expensive to provide — round-the-clock news. In addition, the Web gives us the opportunity to offer far more news content than the printed paper (especially multimedia such as photos and video), discussion boards and interactive conversation on ever-increasing levels, and rapidly growing opportunities for advertisers to reach the exact people they want to reach with their messages, and in unique ways.

It’s a phenomenal public square for news users, communities, journalists and advertisers.

The reason we can make this available at no cost to users is because advertisers support the Web site and printed paper.

I’m often asked whether I believe that one day people will have to pay to access news Web sites. I just don’t see it happening. The business model is still evolving, but I believe the advertising will have to pay for free access to news. Users expect it.

In the morning, I still want to hold the paper in my hands, drink coffee, and read the news. Millions of readers feel the same way. Many others don’t, and a computer screen is preferable to them.

I don’t think it’s unreasonable to ask users to give us a half-dozen or so pieces of demographic information to access that free news. Our aim is to improve our Web site constantly, both in content and experience, and your feedback — including the information you give us by registering — helps us do that.
I doubt Westar is going to give me my electricity for free, or Cox is going to decide to quit billing me for my Internet service. You, either. But we can provide news for free on the Web. Taking two or three minutes to register seems like a sweet deal to me.

Why we published the photos

Putting together the paper each day is a series of questions. Some of them, such as which stories we place on the front page and which will go inside the Local&State section, have obvious answers. When the questions revolve around matters of taste or values, things aren’t quite as simple. The past two nights, the appropriateness of two photographs fell into that realm.

The first photo ran on Page 1B on Wednesday. It accompanied a story about a mural created by Nick Salazar, a senior at Metro-Boulevard Alternative High School. To answer a question in his social studies class – If Jesus Christ, Mohammed and Buddha were to reappear on Earth tomorrow, would they be capitalist, socialist or communist? – Salazar created an illustration on an old chalkboard in his classroom. The mural, which included drawings of Jesus, Mohammed and Buddha, was a prominent part of the photo we ran.

Here was the issue: Many Muslims find artistic depictions of Mohammed blasphemous. With that in mind, do we run the photo, not run it or, since the drawing of Mohammed was on the far right side of the photo, crop that portion off?

After talking to several people I decided we should run it as is. There were a couple of reasons for that decision. First, the photo was germane. The story was beautifully written and didn’t go the easy “look at the cool thing this student did” route. The story was deeper than that and the photo enhanced it by showing readers exactly what was created. Second, I’m sure there are many things we report on that some people don’t think we should cover or don’t like to see or read about. My opinion, however, is that decisions based on fear or second-guessing usually will result in a wrong choice.

The second photo that led to discussions ran on Page 8A on Thursday with the tornadoes story. It showed a man and his daughter looking at ruins of his other daughter’s home in Shirley, Ark. The second daughter was among those killed when a tornado went through the town. Her body was found lying next to that of her 14-year-old Labrador retriever. In the foreground of the photo was the body of the dog.

The photo made me pause. Was this something readers really needed to see? To be honest, I have tremendous affection for dogs and the photo disturbed me deeply. That reaction, though, is appropriate. Dozens of people died in the storms and we should be bothered by the death and destruction. Ultimately, I decided that running the photo, including the dog’s body, created a stronger emotional impact than just a shot of the family looking at the ruins.

So, would you have made the same decision or gone another way? Click on the comments link on the left and tell me what you would have done.