Category Archives: Law and lawmakers

Common Law, No. 19: If she’d been more violent, state would help her

Legislators pass laws. Judges uphold them. But when people bring their problems to court, judges catch the idiosyncrasies lawmakers miss. Judge David Kaufman found such flaws in Senate Bill 123, which provides state funds to help pay for drug treatment while people are on probation. Kaufman recently faced a young woman convicted of possessing methamphetamine and making minimal wages. The judge found she’d only be eligible for aid to help her drug problem if she was a more violent criminal.

Kansas judge says “cram down” mortgage bill will help troubled homeowners

The chief bankruptcy judge in Kansas says he and his colleagues are in the best position to help troubled homeowners, if they’re given the authority they need by a new bill going through Congress.

The bill, which Tuesday passed the U.S. House Judiciary Committee, would allow judges to reduce, or “cram down,” mortgages to meet market values for homeowners who owe more on their mortgages than their houses are worth.

“For 30 years bankruptcy judges have been denied the power to modify secured loans on primary residences,” said Judge Robert Nugent of Wichita. “But I think it makes sense. We have the power to do it with commercial debtors and we adjust the value of other assets all the time.”

Previous attempts to get judges the power to alter mortgages, which proponents said could help curb foreclosures, has faced fierce fights from the banking industry. But this time, lending giant Citigroup is supporting the measure.

Watch Kansas.com for more details on this story.

Kline opinion, lawsuit, cost Kansas taxpayers $475,000

A 2003 Kansas Attorney General opinion by Phill Kline and the ensuing lawsuit to defend how health care providers reported sexual activity among teenagers cost Kansas taxpayers $475,000 in court costs and attorneys fees, lawyers for the plaintiffs said.

Kline

Kline

The final legal tab was settled last week between the Center for Reproductive Rights, which sued Kline, and the office of current Attorney General Stephen Six. The organization in 2006 won a restraining order in federal court against Kline and Sedgwick County District Attorney Nola Foulston over the way health care providers report sexual activity of teenagers.

“When someone like Phill Kline does something like this just to grandstand, the taxpayers have to fund that,” said Bonnie Scott Jones, one of the lawyers that brought the suit on behalf of health care workers in Kansas. “And they’re funding grandstanding on something that was clearly unconstitutional.”

Kline targeted abortion clinics in his opinion, issued just months after he took office.

The opinion broadly interpreted a Kansas law that required health care providers, teachers, counselors and others who work with young people to report any case where there’s “reason to suspect that a child has been injured” as a result of sexual abuse. Kline said abortion clinics must report any girl under 16 who showed up for services. A young girl’s pregnancy, he said, was evidence of a sex crime. He went on to say that requirement would extend to other illegal sexual contact. In Kansas, that includes almost any intimate activity involving teens under the age of 16.

Health care providers from the Wichita and Kansas City areas sued, claiming that such a broad interpretation of the law – and the strict reporting requirements – would drive teens away from their offices, preventing them from seeking birth control and treatment for diseases.

The case garnered national attention and was nicknamed “the kiss and tell case” by the media.

U.S. District Judge J. Thomas Marten agreed that health care providers should be granted discretion in what they report, protecting the privacy of the teens. Legislators last year amended the law to reflect Marten’s ruling.

Kline lost his re-election bid for AG in 2006. On Tuesday, he lost the Republican primary in his attempt to be re-elected as Johnson County District Attorney.

Two new judges seats approved by Legislature

Lawmakers approved funding for two new judges positions in Sedgwick County District Court, which may make the ballot in time for the fall primary.

Timing is the key. The funding has passed the House and the Senate but has to go through an omnibus committee, which doesn’t meet until next month. The budget then needs to be approved by the Governor. To get on the ballot, the Kansas Supreme Court would have to certify the positions by April 15. Judges are hoping the Supreme Court could go ahead and certify the positions with a provision that the funding must pass.

Still, it’s a tight race to make the June 10 filing deadline to run for one of the new offices.