<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Retweets from the RICO gang trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/2009/03/10/retweets-from-the-rico-gang-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/2009/03/10/retweets-from-the-rico-gang-trial/</link>
	<description>News from inside Wichita&#039;s courts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:37:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: twistudios</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/2009/03/10/retweets-from-the-rico-gang-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-987</link>
		<dc:creator>twistudios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 16:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/?p=706#comment-987</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Twitter is useful only if one follows the tweets throughout an event, such as a trial. If one tried to pick up a tweet or two and expect to get the whole story, they would be missing out on a lot of information much like catching a radio news story midway. I see twitter (as it has been used in recent trails) as a written version of a radio or television news story. In addition, the news public is accustomed to learning the story after the fact, twitter does it as it is happening. Sorta like a live news conference that we see on televison. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Personally, I use twitter for the awesome, awesome links that users post (primarily photography related. Plus I have learned about some great new places to hang out in Wichita.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter is useful only if one follows the tweets throughout an event, such as a trial. If one tried to pick up a tweet or two and expect to get the whole story, they would be missing out on a lot of information much like catching a radio news story midway. I see twitter (as it has been used in recent trails) as a written version of a radio or television news story. In addition, the news public is accustomed to learning the story after the fact, twitter does it as it is happening. Sorta like a live news conference that we see on televison. </p>

<p>Personally, I use twitter for the awesome, awesome links that users post (primarily photography related. Plus I have learned about some great new places to hang out in Wichita.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronsylvester</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/2009/03/10/retweets-from-the-rico-gang-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-986</link>
		<dc:creator>ronsylvester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 19:18:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/?p=706#comment-986</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The reaction we&#039;ve gotten is very positive.  People feel they&#039;re getting more detail from my Twitter reports throughout the day, making it more comprehensive than what they might find in print.  I am able to report much more through Twitter than I can manage to get in one newspaper article.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;That said, I am glad I have the opportunity to pull all the information together for a &quot;well-reasoned&quot;  story at the end of the day.  But I can tell when I post to Twitter I think about the information I need to provide and what would best serve those following me.  Because it&#039;s a social networking tool, I can also answer questions people may have and interact with them in a way I never could before.  In those cases, I believe the tweets are &quot;well-reasoned.&quot;  I don&#039;t sacrifice my professional standards just because I&#039;m using a different medium.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve also had people tell me that they don&#039;t regularly read the newspaper, or even visit our web site, but they get the information I provide on Twitter. I look at this as just another avenue to deliver news.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I hope this helps.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also hope we&#039;ll hear from those people who find Twitter useful, who will explain what they get out of it.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reaction we&#8217;ve gotten is very positive.  People feel they&#8217;re getting more detail from my Twitter reports throughout the day, making it more comprehensive than what they might find in print.  I am able to report much more through Twitter than I can manage to get in one newspaper article.</p>

<p>That said, I am glad I have the opportunity to pull all the information together for a &#8220;well-reasoned&#8221;  story at the end of the day.  But I can tell when I post to Twitter I think about the information I need to provide and what would best serve those following me.  Because it&#8217;s a social networking tool, I can also answer questions people may have and interact with them in a way I never could before.  In those cases, I believe the tweets are &#8220;well-reasoned.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t sacrifice my professional standards just because I&#8217;m using a different medium.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve also had people tell me that they don&#8217;t regularly read the newspaper, or even visit our web site, but they get the information I provide on Twitter. I look at this as just another avenue to deliver news.</p>

<p>I hope this helps.</p>

<p>I also hope we&#8217;ll hear from those people who find Twitter useful, who will explain what they get out of it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: billbodiggins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/2009/03/10/retweets-from-the-rico-gang-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-985</link>
		<dc:creator>billbodiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/courts/?p=706#comment-985</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m sorry, but I just do not relate to this Twitter stuff.  It appears to be little more than a list of spur of the moment disjointed stream of consciousness.  It can never take the place of a well reasoned and comprehensive news article.  Or maybe that is just the point, it does not have to be reasoned or comprehensive.  But, wait a minute, maybe that is also the point and why it is a waste of time.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry, but I just do not relate to this Twitter stuff.  It appears to be little more than a list of spur of the moment disjointed stream of consciousness.  It can never take the place of a well reasoned and comprehensive news article.  Or maybe that is just the point, it does not have to be reasoned or comprehensive.  But, wait a minute, maybe that is also the point and why it is a waste of time.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
