<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Casual &#187; Rick Plumlee</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/business/author/rplumlee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business</link>
	<description>Insights into Wichita business from the staff of Business Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:40:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moran corrects broadcasters on flu name</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/10/29/moran-corrects-broadcasters-on-flu-name/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/10/29/moran-corrects-broadcasters-on-flu-name/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rep. Jerry Moran has sent a letter to major news broadcasting companies requesting that they stop referring to the H1N1 virus as &#8220;swine flu.&#8221; He noted that the labeling has &#8220;magnified&#8221; the pork industry&#8217;s ongoing economic woes, which is expected to grow to $1.89 billion in losses by the end of the year. In 2008, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rep. Jerry Moran has <a href="http://www.jerrymoran.house.gov/index.php?option=content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1559&amp;Itemid=103">sent a letter</a> to major news broadcasting companies requesting that they stop referring to the H1N1 virus as &#8220;swine flu.&#8221; He noted that the labeling has &#8220;magnified&#8221; the pork industry&#8217;s ongoing economic woes, which is expected to grow to $1.89 billion in losses by the end of the year. In 2008, Kansas&#8217; gross swine market was $406 million, 10th in the U.S.</p>
<p>On the brighter side for pork, the National Pork Producers Council announced today that China has lifted its ban on U.S. pork imports. China implemented the ban in late April in wake of the outbreak of H1N1 flu. China was the No. 3 destination for U.S. pork in 2008, when nearly 400,000 metric tons worth nearly $690 million was exported to the Asian country, according to the NPPC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/10/29/moran-corrects-broadcasters-on-flu-name/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Field day to address animal rights concerns</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/25/field-day-to-address-animal-rights-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/25/field-day-to-address-animal-rights-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 15:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent years, livestock organizations have tried to address what they  consider to be unfair criticism from animal rights activists. They have taken a more active role in explaining the care ranchers and farmers take in handling their livestock.
Today, at a field day near Hutchinson, Animal Agriculture Alliance executive vice president Kay Smith will [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In recent years, livestock organizations have tried to address what they  consider to be unfair criticism from animal rights activists. They have taken a more active role in explaining the care ranchers and farmers take in handling their livestock.</p>
<p>Today, at a field day near Hutchinson, Animal Agriculture Alliance executive vice president Kay Smith will explain how her organization is helping the industry respond to concerns about animal care.  Other topics will also be discussed. All livestock producers and others involved in the business are invited. The event starts at 3:30 p.m. at the Jon Mollhagen family&#8217;s Reno Ranch. <a href="http://www.kla.org/field.htm">Go here for directions.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/25/field-day-to-address-animal-rights-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>23</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farmers keeping up with social media</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/19/farmers-keeping-up-with-social-media/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/19/farmers-keeping-up-with-social-media/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farmers aren&#8217;t ignoring social networking. According to a  recent survey, Agriculture New Media Usage Study,  found 62 percent of large crop growers have sent or received text messages during the past year and 63 percent of the respondents have taken pictures with mobile phones.  Facebook and Twitter are also attracting farmers.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmers aren&#8217;t ignoring social networking. According to a  recent survey, <a href="http://www.nicholsonkovac.com/#/other/get-whats-new">Agriculture New Media Usage Study</a>,  found 62 percent of large crop growers have sent or received text messages during the past year and 63 percent of the respondents have taken pictures with mobile phones.  Facebook and Twitter are also attracting farmers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/08/19/farmers-keeping-up-with-social-media/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ag site helps explain ACRE</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/07/28/ag-site-helps-explain-acre/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/07/28/ag-site-helps-explain-acre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The National Corn Growers Association has developed a bulletin for landowners on the farm bill&#8217;s ACRE (Average Crop Revenue Election) program. But Art Barnaby, a Kansas State University agricultural economist, says the paper is also a helpful resource for wheat growers.
Barnaby stressed it&#8217;s important for producers to stay on top of ACRE information, particularly with [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The National Corn Growers Association has <a href="http://ncga.com/files/pdf/ACREforLandowners.pdf">developed a </a><a href="http://ncga.com/files/pdf/ACREforLandowners.pdf">bulletin </a>for landowners on the farm bill&#8217;s ACRE (Average Crop Revenue Election) program. But Art Barnaby, a Kansas State University agricultural economist, says the paper is also a helpful resource for wheat growers.</p>
<p>Barnaby stressed it&#8217;s important for producers to stay on top of ACRE information, particularly with the USDA&#8217;s statistic service releasing its first yield estimate Aug. 12.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Aug. 12. . .report could be a game changer in some states,&#8221; Barnaby said. &#8220;I think the (corn) association&#8217;s bulletin explains most of the landlord issues.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/07/28/ag-site-helps-explain-acre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>If the phone line is busy . . .</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/24/if-the-phone-line-is-busy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/24/if-the-phone-line-is-busy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 18:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1573</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wednesday was the eighth day on the job for Kirk Schulz as Kansas State University&#8217;s new president.
How time flies when you&#8217;re busy dealing with the controversy over the contract of ex-KSU football coach Ron Prince and an audit released last week by the Kansas Board of Regents that revealed financial irregularities  at K-State.
Schulz spent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wednesday was the eighth day on the job for Kirk Schulz as Kansas State University&#8217;s new president.</p>
<p>How time flies when you&#8217;re busy dealing with the controversy over the contract of ex-KSU football coach Ron Prince and an audit released last week by the Kansas Board of Regents that revealed financial irregularities  at K-State.</p>
<p>Schulz spent part of Wednesday speaking at the luncheon meeting of the  Agri-Business Council of Wichita at the Hilton Wichita Airport.</p>
<p>&#8220;I hope my second week is nothing like my first week,&#8221; he said. &#8220;I&#8217;ve talked more to the media in the last 10 days than I have total in my first four years.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/24/if-the-phone-line-is-busy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Oil to reach $80-$90 by early 2010</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/02/report-oil-to-reach-80-90-by-early-2010/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/02/report-oil-to-reach-80-90-by-early-2010/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 17:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OPEC&#8217;s secretary general told Reuters today that oil prices could hit $80 to $90 a barrel by early next year. At the same time, Abdullah al-Badri also said OPEC was not ready to formally increase its output ceiling.
Tuesday, West Texas crude was going for $68.25 per barrel.
 In a separate story, Baldri told Reuters that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OPEC&#8217;s secretary general<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalEnergy09/idUSTRE5513BW20090602"> told Reuters today</a> that oil prices could hit $80 to $90 a barrel by early next year. At the same time, Abdullah al-Badri also said OPEC was not ready to formally increase its output ceiling.</p>
<p>Tuesday, West Texas crude was going for $68.25 per barrel.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/GlobalEnergy09/idUSTRE5514DR20090602"> In a separate story, </a>Baldri told Reuters that more balance was needed between the amount of oil traded in the physical markets and the &#8220;paper&#8221; markets. OPEC has blamed that imbalance for driving oil prices to a record-high $147 a barrel last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/06/02/report-oil-to-reach-80-90-by-early-2010/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ag community divided over cap-and-trade</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/20/ag-community-divided-over-cap-and-trade/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/20/ag-community-divided-over-cap-and-trade/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WICHITA &#8212; The agricultural community doesn&#8217;t speak with one voice when it comes to federal cap-and-trade legislation now being considered by House committees.
Roger Johnson, the new president of the National Farmers Union,  made it clear in an interview with The Wichita Eagle this week that he would only support cap-and-trade if ag would be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WICHITA &#8212; The agricultural community doesn&#8217;t speak with one voice when it comes to federal cap-and-trade legislation now being considered by House committees.</p>
<p>Roger Johnson, the new president of the National Farmers Union,  made it clear in <a href="http://www.kansas.com/business/agriculture/story/819344.html">an interview with The Wichita Eagle this week</a> that he would only support cap-and-trade if ag would be allowed to sell carbon offsets.</p>
<p>But the American Farm Bureau Federation appears to be <a href="http://www.fb.org/index.php?fuseaction=newsroom.newsfocus&amp;year=2009&amp;file=nr0518b.html">against the climate change bill,</a> which includes the proposed cap-and-trade system, under any conditions.  AFBF president Bob Stallman  notes that the legislation would put U.S. farmers at a competitive disadvantage in the international marketplace.</p>
<p>U.S. Rep. Jerry Moran, R-Hays,  <a href="http://www.jerrymoran.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=1235&amp;Itemid=37">said this week</a> it&#8217;s  not likely that revenue from offsets will &#8220;even come close&#8221; to mitigating the increased costs of inputs that would result from the legislation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/20/ag-community-divided-over-cap-and-trade/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fed report: farmland values steady, ag credit tightens</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/15/fed-report-farmland-values-steady-ag-credit-tightens/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/15/fed-report-farmland-values-steady-ag-credit-tightens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1479</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Farmland values appeared to stabilize in the first quarter of 2009 for the 10th district, according to a survey of agricultural credit conditions conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
District farmland values held relatively steady after modest declines at the end of 2008. Non-irrigated farmland values rose 1.4 percent during the quarter, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Farmland values appeared to stabilize in the first quarter of 2009 for the 10th district, according to <a href="http://www.kansascityfed.org/Agcrsurv/AGCR1Q09.pdf">a survey of agricultural credit conditions</a> conducted by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.</p>
<p>District farmland values held relatively steady after modest declines at the end of 2008. Non-irrigated farmland values rose 1.4 percent during the quarter, and there was no change in the value of irrigated acreage.</p>
<p>The survey of 255 bankers also found that softer farm incomes slowed capital spending, and turbulent agricultural and macroeconomic conditions contributed to tighter agricultural credit conditions.</p>
<p>Collateral requirements edged up and the rate of loan repayment fell for the second straight quarter.  The bankers also felt that agricultural credit conditions could weaken further.</p>
<p>The 10th district includes Kansas, Colorado, Nebraska, Oklahoma, Wyoming, the northern half of New Mexico and the western third of Missouri.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/15/fed-report-farmland-values-steady-ag-credit-tightens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poll: Kansans willing to pay to generate more renewable energy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/13/1465/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/13/1465/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 20:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A poll released this week by the Climate and Energy Project showed three out of four Kansans would be willing to pay between $2 to $5 more every month on their energy bill if it means generating more renewable energy.
So what do you think? Is that an accurate reflection of the state&#8217;s thinking?
The polling was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A <a href="http://climateandenergy.org/LearnMore/InTheNews/RESpoll.htm">poll </a><a href="http://climateandenergy.org/LearnMore/InTheNews/RESpoll.htm">released this week</a> by the <a href="http://climateandenergy.org/">Climate and Energy Project</a> showed three out of four Kansans would be willing to pay between $2 to $5 more every month on their energy bill if it means generating more renewable energy.</p>
<p>So what do you think? Is that an accurate reflection of the state&#8217;s thinking?</p>
<p>The polling was conducted April 26-29 by <a href="http://www.ayresmchenry.com/">Ayres, McHenry and Associates</a>. The poll surveyed 600 registered voters selected randomly throughout the state and had a 4 percent margin of error.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/13/1465/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farmers respond to their critics</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/11/farmers-respond-to-their-critics/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/11/farmers-respond-to-their-critics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 16:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rick Plumlee</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Agriculture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=1449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A new agriculture organization, The Hand That Feeds U.S., has been formed to  explain the farmer&#8217;s side of the story to the media. The effort is in response those critical of farmers on various issues, including areas of  food costs and the environment, the group said.
&#8220;It makes no sense that we&#8217;re being demonized [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A new agriculture organization, <a href="http://www.thehandthatfeedsus.org/News_Farmers_Hope_to_Grow_Media_Support.cfm">The Hand That Feeds U.S.</a>, has been formed to  explain the farmer&#8217;s side of the story to the media. The effort is in response those critical of farmers on various issues, including areas of  food costs and the environment, the group said.</p>
<p>&#8220;It makes no sense that we&#8217;re being demonized by many of the nation&#8217;s top newspapers,&#8221; said Linda Raun, a rice grower in Texas. &#8220;We haven&#8217;t done a good enough job telling them our story.&#8221;</p>
<p>Monday, two U.S. senators, Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., wrote an open <a href="http://www.thehandthatfeedsus.org">letter </a>to U.S. media outlets noting that opposition to debate leading up to the 2008 farm bill was &#8220;largely marked by misinformation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Andy Quinn, a Minnesota corn and ethanol producer, said, &#8220;We&#8217;re the best farmers in the world, but we&#8217;re far from being master communicators. For too long, we&#8217;ve let a handful of environmental extremists and coalitions bankrolled by big business define our industry in the news.&#8221;</p>
<p>Among tidbits of information cited by <a href="http://www.farmpolicyfacts.org">Farm Policy Facts</a>:</p>
<p>- Americans spend 9.8 percent of their income on food _ less than consumers in any other country.</p>
<p>- For every dollar Americans spend on food, farmers get 20 cents.</p>
<p>-  Of the $2.99 retail price for a one-pound loaf of bread, farmers receive 12 cents.</p>
<p>- Only 10 percent of funding in the farm bill goes to farm programs. More than 70 percent of the farm bill-related spending goes to food and nutrition programs such as food stamps.</p>
<p>- 95 percent of U.S. farms are run by families, farmer partnerships or co-ops. Less than 5 percent are corporate farms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2009/05/11/farmers-respond-to-their-critics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
