<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Business Casual &#187; Andi Atwater</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/business/author/aatwater/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business</link>
	<description>Insights into Wichita business from the staff of Business Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:02:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Health insurance and small business: more money, less coverage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/25/health-insurance-and-small-business-more-money-less-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/25/health-insurance-and-small-business-more-money-less-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaiser family foundation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premiums]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Employer-based health insurance premiums are up 5 percent this year and have more than doubled since 1999 &#8212; a growth rate that far outpaces inflation as well as any increase in workers&#8217; wages over the same period, according to an annual employer survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Employer-based health insurance premiums are up 5 percent this year and have more than doubled since 1999 &#8212; <a title="Wall Street Journal" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122221225991369069.html" target="_blank">a growth rate that far outpaces inflation</a> as well as any increase in workers&#8217; wages over the same period, according to <a title="Kaiser Family Foundation" href="http://ehbs.kff.org/" target="_self">an annual employer survey</a> by the Kaiser Family Foundation and the Health Research and Educational Trust, which polled nearly 2,000 employers.</p>
<p><a title="The Miami Herald" href="http://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics/AP/story/699964.html" target="_blank">The Miami Herald</a> points out that the news is even more stressful for small employers.</p>
<blockquote><p>Meanwhile, a growing number of workers at smaller firms are getting less coverage for their money as health plans with high deductibles and fewer benefits become more prevalent.</p>
<p>The portion of workers with single coverage who pay a deductible of at least $1,000 has jumped from 10 percent to 18 percent in the past two years. Among smaller firms with three to 199 employees, the rate has more than doubled from 16 percent to 35 percent.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/25/health-insurance-and-small-business-more-money-less-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hospitals warned not to make errors with anticoagulant medications</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/24/hospitals-warned-not-to-make-errors-with-anticoagulant-medications/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/24/hospitals-warned-not-to-make-errors-with-anticoagulant-medications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 14:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anticoagulents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joint Commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medication errors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patient safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=609</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anticoagulant medication errors are too prevalent and such a serious safety issue that the Joint Commission today is warning hospitals to pay better attention to how they administer this drug to patients.
Anticoagulants have been identified as one of the top five drug types associated with patient safety incidents in the United States, the commission says.
Among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anticoagulant medication errors are too prevalent and such a serious safety issue that the Joint Commission today <a title="Joint Commission Sentinel Event Alert" href="http://www.jointcommission.org/SentinelEvents/SentinelEventAlert/sea_41.htm" target="_blank">is warning hospitals</a> to pay better attention to how they administer this drug to patients.</p>
<p>Anticoagulants have been identified as one of the top five drug types associated with patient safety incidents in the United States, the commission says.</p>
<p>Among the causes for adverse events is incorrect dosages, food and drug interactions, and poor labeling that lends to confusion and error.</p>
<p>Says the commission:</p>
<blockquote><p>Anticoagulant medication errors are such a serious patient safety issue that The Joint Commission addresses these types of errors in the 2008 National Patient Safety Goals, with full implementation of the requirements expected by January 1, 2009, for hospitals, outpatient clinics, home care and long term care organizations across the United States.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/24/hospitals-warned-not-to-make-errors-with-anticoagulant-medications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cancer treatment never better, but oncologist shortage is looming</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/23/cancer-treatment-never-better-but-oncologist-shortage-is-looming/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/23/cancer-treatment-never-better-but-oncologist-shortage-is-looming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 14:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cancer treatment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doctor shortage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oncologists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oncology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicians]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cancer treatments are advancing steadily, but the supply of cancer doctors isn&#8217;t, USA Today reports.
The United States could face a shortage of as many as 4,080 oncologists by 2020, according to a report from the American Society for Clinical Oncology.
Factors contributing to the impending shortfall include the aging of the U.S. population (cancer is more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cancer treatments are advancing steadily, but the supply of cancer doctors isn&#8217;t, <a title="USA Today" href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-09-20-cancer-doctors_N.htm" target="_blank">USA Today reports</a>.</p>
<p>The United States could face a shortage of as many as 4,080 oncologists by 2020, according to a report from the American Society for Clinical Oncology.</p>
<p>Factors contributing to the impending shortfall include the aging of the U.S. population (cancer is more prevalent among older adults), retiring oncologists, and &#8212; shockingly &#8212; a growing number of female oncologists. Apparently, studies show female cancer doctors see fewer patients than their male counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/23/cancer-treatment-never-better-but-oncologist-shortage-is-looming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lifestyle, balance a factor in doctors (not) specializing in primary care medicine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/19/lifestyle-balance-a-factor-in-doctors-not-specializing-in-primary-care-medicine/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/19/lifestyle-balance-a-factor-in-doctors-not-specializing-in-primary-care-medicine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal of the american medical association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some of the reasons fewer medical students are choosing to specialize in primary care &#8212; a subset of internal medicine &#8212; has to do with lifestyle, says a report in the Sept. 10 issue of JAMA, the Journal of the American Medical Association.
They want better hours and recompense for the amount of time and work [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of the reasons fewer medical students are choosing to specialize in primary care &#8212; a subset of internal medicine &#8212; has to do with lifestyle, says a report in the Sept. 10 issue of <a title="JAMA" href="http://jama.ama-assn.org/" target="_blank">JAMA</a>, the Journal of the American Medical Association.</p>
<p>They want better hours and recompense for the amount of time and work it requires to treat the large portion of elderly and medically complex patients this specialty sees.</p>
<p>A study to find out students&#8217; impressions and concerns found they were concerned about patient complexity, the practice environment and lifestyle, compared with other specialties, officials said.</p>
<blockquote><p>“Current students recognize the increasing demands on internists, particularly primary care physicians, to accomplish large numbers of preventive and therapeutic interventions during short visits with chronically ill patients while also managing increasing administrative expectations,” the authors wrote. “Career interest in general (internal medicine) is particularly low, reflecting the challenges in the primary care practice environment&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/19/lifestyle-balance-a-factor-in-doctors-not-specializing-in-primary-care-medicine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nurses want better working conditions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/15/nurses-want-better-working-conditions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/15/nurses-want-better-working-conditions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nurse shortage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nursing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recruitment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Turns out, nurses value better working conditions and a greater say in patient care over financial incentives, according to a Washington Post story.
The awe-inspiring bonuses and other impressive incentives from the recruitment craze of recent years, spurred by a national nursing shortage, are starting to settle in favor of the quieter, but more favorable conditions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Turns out, nurses value better working conditions and a greater say in patient care over financial incentives, according to a <a title="Washington Post" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/12/AR2008091203367.html" target="_blank">Washington Post</a> story.</p>
<p>The awe-inspiring bonuses and other impressive incentives from the recruitment craze of recent years, spurred by a national nursing shortage, are starting to settle in favor of the quieter, but more favorable conditions that actually keep nurses happy.</p>
<p>The hard truth:</p>
<blockquote><p>Five years ago, hospitals waged intense bidding wars to fill nursing vacancies, luring nurses with huge signing bonuses and even sport-utility vehicles and vacations to the Bahamas. Those efforts often only served to exacerbate turnover, spurring nurses to remain in jobs just long enough to claim the prizes before moving to other hospitals with better incentives.</p>
<p>As it turns out, many nurses want better working conditions more than they do extra money. Hospitals now are responding by introducing technology to dramatically reduce paperwork, offering more flexible hours, reducing caseloads, paying for advanced training and giving them more authority.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/15/nurses-want-better-working-conditions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick hits: comparing our hospitals&#8217; death rates by ZIP Code</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/12/quick-hits-comparing-our-hospitals-death-rates-by-zip-code/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/12/quick-hits-comparing-our-hospitals-death-rates-by-zip-code/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galichia heart hospital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital compare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mortality graphs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Via Christi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wesley Medical Center]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Medicare&#8217;s oft-cited Hospital Compare Web resource now features a new mini-tool that allows you to quickly compare up to three mortality graphs on hospitals within a zip code range.
The results will show you 30-day death (mortality) rates for heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia. Yes, the data is risk-adjusted for balance.
Out of seven hospital choices, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Medicare&#8217;s oft-cited Hospital Compare Web resource <a title="Medicare's Hospital Mortality Graphs search site" href="http://www.hospitalcompare.hhs.gov/hospital/mortalitytool/index.asp" target="_blank">now features a new mini-tool</a> that allows you to quickly compare up to three mortality graphs on hospitals within a zip code range.</p>
<p>The results will show you 30-day death (mortality) rates for heart attack, heart failure and pneumonia. Yes, the data is risk-adjusted for balance.</p>
<p>Out of seven hospital choices, I chose to compare Galichia Heart Hospital, Via Christi Regional Medical Center and Wesley Medical Center, three acute-care hospitals/systems in Wichita with emergency departments. I am happy to report that all three hospital systems were very close to the national average and considered, statistically, &#8220;no different than the national rate.&#8221; However, it&#8217;s worth noting that both Galichia and Via Christi rates were consistently a few points better than the national average.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/12/quick-hits-comparing-our-hospitals-death-rates-by-zip-code/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fewer graduating doctors choosing primary care</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/fewer-graduating-doctors-choosing-primary-care/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/fewer-graduating-doctors-choosing-primary-care/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 18:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[journal of the american medical association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physician shortage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary care]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This won&#8217;t come as a surprise to those who&#8217;ve followed my coverage regarding a looming primary care physician shortage, but a new report published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association says only 2 percent of graduating medical students say they plan to work in primary care internal medicine.
This is a 7 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This won&#8217;t come as a surprise to those who&#8217;ve followed my coverage regarding a looming primary care physician shortage, but a new report published this week in the Journal of the American Medical Association says <a title="AP story" href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5j9vQmR7AZDkCnUDJH6TMpybABTIAD933GH8O0" target="_blank">only 2 percent of graduating medical students</a> say they plan to work in primary care internal medicine.</p>
<p>This is a 7 percent decline from 1990, when 9 percent of graduating students said they planned to go into primary care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/fewer-graduating-doctors-choosing-primary-care/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study finds retail health clinics save patients money</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/study-finds-retail-health-clinics-save-patients-money/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/study-finds-retail-health-clinics-save-patients-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 15:53:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA["health affairs"]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[emergency department]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minuteclinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[physicians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[primary care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retail health clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk-in health clinics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walk-in retail health clinics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Walk-in, retail health clinics are savings consumers a lot of money over doctor&#8217;s office visits, a new study found.
The study looked at MinuteClinics &#8212; associated with CVS drugstores &#8212; vs. family doctors and the emergency department for the treatment of common ailments, such as sore throats and ear infections.
Reports the Pioneer Press on the study [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Walk-in, retail health clinics are savings consumers a lot of money over doctor&#8217;s office visits, a new study found.</p>
<p>The study looked at MinuteClinics &#8212; associated with CVS drugstores &#8212; vs. family doctors and the emergency department for the treatment of common ailments, such as sore throats and ear infections.</p>
<p>Reports the <a title="Pioneer Press" href="http://www.twincities.com/ci_10422863?nclick_check=1" target="_blank">Pioneer Press</a> on the study published in the latest issue of the journal Health Affairs:</p>
<blockquote><p><span id="default">The total cost of a patient treated at a MinuteClinic for one of five basic illnesses was $51 cheaper on average than a patient treated at urgent care and $55 cheaper than a patient treated by a primary-care doctor. Pharmacy costs were also slightly lower for the patients using MinuteClinics.</span></p></blockquote>
<p>The <a title="Health Affairs article" href="http://content.healthaffairs.org/cgi/content/abstract/27/5/1272" target="_blank">study authors</a> note that 10 clinical problems such as sinusitis<sup> </sup>and immunizations make up more than 90 percent of retail clinic<sup> </sup>visits. These same 10 clinical problems make up 13 percent<sup> </sup>of adult primary care visits, 30 percent of pediatric primary care visits, and<sup> </sup>12 percent of emergency department visits.</p>
<p>But then the authors talk about the main issue that really concerns the medical establishment:</p>
<blockquote><p>Whether there will be a future shift<sup> </sup>of care from emergency departments or primary care doctors to retail clinics is unknown.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/11/study-finds-retail-health-clinics-save-patients-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wellness program netted 17 percent ROI for employers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/10/wellness-program-netted-17-percent-roi-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/10/wellness-program-netted-17-percent-roi-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obese employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[return on investment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ROI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wellness program]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Those wellness programs you&#8217;ve been on the fence about? Turns out they just may save you money.
A new study published in the September Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine reports that a program to reduce weight and improve health risk factors in obese employees produced a short-term return on investment of $1.17 per dollar spent.
In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those wellness programs you&#8217;ve been on the fence about? Turns out they just may save you money.</p>
<p>A new study published in the September <a title="Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine" href="http://www.joem.org/" target="_blank">Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine</a> reports that a program to reduce weight and improve health risk factors in obese employees produced a short-term return on investment of $1.17 per dollar spent.</p>
<p>In this case, a group of 890 overweight and obese employees from various companies were studied as they used a program called Healthyroads, which costs an average of $300 a year per employee. The study found for each dollar spent on the obesity management program, costs decreased by $1.17.</p>
<p>So where was the money saved? Mostly reduced health care spending, but also better productivity:</p>
<blockquote><p>To assess the financial impact of the program, the researchers used a recently developed ROI model, which estimated the changes in medical costs and worker productivity resulting from reductions in health risks. The results suggested a total projected savings of nearly $312,000. About 60 percent of the savings resulted from reduced health care spending; the remaining 40 percent resulted from improvements in productivity.</p></blockquote>
<p>If that&#8217;s not an argument for the effectiveness of workplace wellness programs, I don&#8217;t know what is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/10/wellness-program-netted-17-percent-roi-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Providers tackle hospital-acquired infections Medicare will no longer tolerate</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/09/providers-tackle-hospital-acquired-infections-medicare-will-no-longer-tolerate/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/09/providers-tackle-hospital-acquired-infections-medicare-will-no-longer-tolerate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andi Atwater</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chasing Zero Summit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hospital acquired infections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/?p=519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than 400 health care industry leaders are meeting in Washington today to figure out how they can put a stop to the hospital-acquired infections that impact about 2 million patients annually, kill as many as 100,000 patients and add as much as $20 billion in additional costs to the health care industry, organizers report.
In [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 400 health care industry leaders are meeting in Washington today to figure out how they can put a stop to the hospital-acquired infections that impact about 2 million patients annually, kill as many as 100,000 patients and add as much as $20 billion in additional costs to the health care industry, organizers report.</p>
<blockquote><p>In an informal poll of <a title="Chasing Zero Summit" href="http://www.cardinalhealth.com/ChasingZero/HAI/" target="_blank">Chasing Zero Summit</a> attendees, respondents said that of the 11 preventable conditions that will receive lower or no Medicare reimbursements, the top three most difficult conditions to address are HAIs (hospital acquired infections). In addition, 80 percent of poll respondents indicated that increasing hospital staff awareness, education and training related to infection prevention would have the most significant impact on providers’ abilities to reduce HAIs.</p></blockquote>
<p>The first ever summit on hospital-acquired infections features a number of prominent speakers, including Alan Greenspan, chairman of the Federal Reserve System from 1987 to 2006; Thomas Valuck, Center for Medicare Management medical officer and senior advisor; Mark McClellan, director of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution and Uwe Reinhardt, James Madison Professor of Political Economics at Princeton University.</p>
<p>Too bad it took Medicare&#8217;s plan to lower or deny  claims for certain preventable conditions beginning next month to get these folks to the table, but I&#8217;m glad they&#8217;re there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/09/09/providers-tackle-hospital-acquired-infections-medicare-will-no-longer-tolerate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
