<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bungling my bundling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/</link>
	<description>Insights into Wichita business from the staff of Business Today</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:29:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-159</link>
		<dc:creator>bth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-159</guid>
		<description>This sounds ALMOST as bad as my experiences with Verizon Business Solutions since their takeover of MCI.  Unilateral changes in service conditions, false billings, overcharges, etc.

I wonder if Alltel cellphone customers will have similar problems with Verizon cellphone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds ALMOST as bad as my experiences with Verizon Business Solutions since their takeover of MCI.  Unilateral changes in service conditions, false billings, overcharges, etc.</p>
<p>I wonder if Alltel cellphone customers will have similar problems with Verizon cellphone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrcontroversy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>mrcontroversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 20:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-157</guid>
		<description>Linda, Ben:
Just had another great conversation with AT&amp;T :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Linda, Ben:<br />
Just had another great conversation with AT&amp;T <img src='http://blogs.kansas.com/business/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lindainks55</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator>lindainks55</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 19:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-156</guid>
		<description>The day I was liberated from Cox and went on to much better by the simple installation of a dish started out a good day.  It wasn&#039;t until I encountered the lack of customer service provided by Cox Communications that it went downhill.

The monthly bill came in the mail and I noticed a &quot;converter box&quot; rental had increased to $5 per month.  I needed to be downtown for another reason so unhooked the box, tucked the bill into my purse and added that stop to my list of errands.

I was greeted pleasantly and asked how I might be helped when I approached the counter.  I explained we didn&#039;t use the television the box had been hooked to any longer so I wanted to return it and not be charged that monthly rental in the future.

After typing in some info I was told I wasn&#039;t on the account and couldn&#039;t make changes -- only my husband could do that.

We need to back up a tiny bit so you will understand that I had personally set up our account with Multi-Media and my future husband moved into my house and my existing cable services after that point.  Through the buy outs and changing of hands somehow now with this Cox Communications company he was the only person on the account.  I don&#039;t know when or who made that change, I just know it wasn&#039;t either of us.  Just as I won&#039;t ever work on a small engine, my husband won&#039;t ever interact with a cable company.  That&#039;s just not how it&#039;s done at our house!

Back to the present and me standing at the counter trying to return the rented box.

I offered the bill that arrived in that day&#039;s mail, several forms of ID showing I lived at that address.  Nope!  I couldn&#039;t make changes to the account that was in my husband&#039;s name.  I asked for the Supervisor.

Long story short.  I had to ask for the Supervisor&#039;s Supervisor.  Now, I&#039;m seated at a desk of the third person I have explained my need to.  Pleasantly, she repeated the &quot;not on the account&quot; meme.  I asked if my husband could make changes over the phone and she said, &quot;Yes.&quot;  She turned to her back bar, dialed the number I gave her and handed the receiver across the desk to me.

I said, Wayne, I&#039;m at Cox and they need your permission for me to return a rented box.  Now, hubby knows me and he knows this was code.  Remember, he knew this was my area and needing his permission meant some &quot;stuff&quot; was going down.  Some &quot;stuff&quot; he wanted to avoid!  I handed the receiver back across the desk and after she and he exchange a few words she hangs up, turns back to me with the announcement that &quot;Your husband, the account holder, said you had his permission to make changes.&quot;

I asked if I could make any and all changes.  She said, &quot;Yes.&quot;  And she never even saw it coming!

A man on the other end of a phone number I provided gave me permission to make changes to his account.  I don&#039;t do business with people that stupid!  I didn&#039;t wonder for long whether they ever figured any of it out as I headed out the door after canceling the account in its entirety!

The day they could have ruined turned out to be a great day!  I have a superior product, superior customer service and a lower price.  All because they decided I wasn&#039;t on the account!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The day I was liberated from Cox and went on to much better by the simple installation of a dish started out a good day.  It wasn&#8217;t until I encountered the lack of customer service provided by Cox Communications that it went downhill.</p>
<p>The monthly bill came in the mail and I noticed a &#8220;converter box&#8221; rental had increased to $5 per month.  I needed to be downtown for another reason so unhooked the box, tucked the bill into my purse and added that stop to my list of errands.</p>
<p>I was greeted pleasantly and asked how I might be helped when I approached the counter.  I explained we didn&#8217;t use the television the box had been hooked to any longer so I wanted to return it and not be charged that monthly rental in the future.</p>
<p>After typing in some info I was told I wasn&#8217;t on the account and couldn&#8217;t make changes &#8212; only my husband could do that.</p>
<p>We need to back up a tiny bit so you will understand that I had personally set up our account with Multi-Media and my future husband moved into my house and my existing cable services after that point.  Through the buy outs and changing of hands somehow now with this Cox Communications company he was the only person on the account.  I don&#8217;t know when or who made that change, I just know it wasn&#8217;t either of us.  Just as I won&#8217;t ever work on a small engine, my husband won&#8217;t ever interact with a cable company.  That&#8217;s just not how it&#8217;s done at our house!</p>
<p>Back to the present and me standing at the counter trying to return the rented box.</p>
<p>I offered the bill that arrived in that day&#8217;s mail, several forms of ID showing I lived at that address.  Nope!  I couldn&#8217;t make changes to the account that was in my husband&#8217;s name.  I asked for the Supervisor.</p>
<p>Long story short.  I had to ask for the Supervisor&#8217;s Supervisor.  Now, I&#8217;m seated at a desk of the third person I have explained my need to.  Pleasantly, she repeated the &#8220;not on the account&#8221; meme.  I asked if my husband could make changes over the phone and she said, &#8220;Yes.&#8221;  She turned to her back bar, dialed the number I gave her and handed the receiver across the desk to me.</p>
<p>I said, Wayne, I&#8217;m at Cox and they need your permission for me to return a rented box.  Now, hubby knows me and he knows this was code.  Remember, he knew this was my area and needing his permission meant some &#8220;stuff&#8221; was going down.  Some &#8220;stuff&#8221; he wanted to avoid!  I handed the receiver back across the desk and after she and he exchange a few words she hangs up, turns back to me with the announcement that &#8220;Your husband, the account holder, said you had his permission to make changes.&#8221;</p>
<p>I asked if I could make any and all changes.  She said, &#8220;Yes.&#8221;  And she never even saw it coming!</p>
<p>A man on the other end of a phone number I provided gave me permission to make changes to his account.  I don&#8217;t do business with people that stupid!  I didn&#8217;t wonder for long whether they ever figured any of it out as I headed out the door after canceling the account in its entirety!</p>
<p>The day they could have ruined turned out to be a great day!  I have a superior product, superior customer service and a lower price.  All because they decided I wasn&#8217;t on the account!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-155</link>
		<dc:creator>bth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-155</guid>
		<description>“news content provided by Cox”.

Sounds almost as bad as FAUX running GOP campaign ads as “news content provided by the GOP”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“news content provided by Cox”.</p>
<p>Sounds almost as bad as FAUX running GOP campaign ads as “news content provided by the GOP”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrcontroversy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>mrcontroversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Give me a break!
Take that hit piece the Eagle wrote in January of 2007 that was slanted wayyyy too much toward Cox.
Take the fact that trying to get anything past Lori Linenberger regarding any of the four local stations Cox refuses to carry is tantamount to a act of espionage.
Take the fact that the Eagle--at the urging of the local cable company--took KCTU out of the TV listings in 1995. Now they say the TV listings are &quot;a paid supplement&quot;... never mind that the Monday through Saturday listings show no such annotation. Would the higher-ups at McClatchy like to know that the Eagle is giving Cox $20,200 a week in apparently free advertising?
And then there&#039;s the whole TV guide thing... you ask the newsroom, they tell you it&#039;s an advertising product; ask the advertising department and they tell you it&#039;s &quot;news content provided by Cox&quot;.
Care for any MORE enlightenment?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break!<br />
Take that hit piece the Eagle wrote in January of 2007 that was slanted wayyyy too much toward Cox.<br />
Take the fact that trying to get anything past Lori Linenberger regarding any of the four local stations Cox refuses to carry is tantamount to a act of espionage.<br />
Take the fact that the Eagle&#8211;at the urging of the local cable company&#8211;took KCTU out of the TV listings in 1995. Now they say the TV listings are &#8220;a paid supplement&#8221;&#8230; never mind that the Monday through Saturday listings show no such annotation. Would the higher-ups at McClatchy like to know that the Eagle is giving Cox $20,200 a week in apparently free advertising?<br />
And then there&#8217;s the whole TV guide thing&#8230; you ask the newsroom, they tell you it&#8217;s an advertising product; ask the advertising department and they tell you it&#8217;s &#8220;news content provided by Cox&#8221;.<br />
Care for any MORE enlightenment?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Loving</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Loving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 16:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-152</guid>
		<description>Mrcontroversy ... I&#039;m not sure what you mean by &quot;whether the Eagle likes it or not.&quot; Can you enlighten me? As far as I&#039;m concerned, I can&#039;t wait for U-verse. The competition will be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mrcontroversy &#8230; I&#8217;m not sure what you mean by &#8220;whether the Eagle likes it or not.&#8221; Can you enlighten me? As far as I&#8217;m concerned, I can&#8217;t wait for U-verse. The competition will be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bth</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>bth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 14:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>Interesting that the author didn&#039;t seem to want to identify the company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting that the author didn&#8217;t seem to want to identify the company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mrcontroversy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/comment-page-1/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator>mrcontroversy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 04:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.kansas.com/business/2008/06/17/bungling-my-bundling/#comment-146</guid>
		<description>AT&amp;T U-verse will be here before the end of the year... whether the Eagle likes it or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AT&amp;T U-verse will be here before the end of the year&#8230; whether the Eagle likes it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
